Blade Plate With Autogenous Bone Grafting to Salvage Peri Ankle Nonunions.

BACKGROUND: Salvage surgery for a nonunion around the ankle is challenging. Poor bone stock, stiffness, scarring, previous (or persistent) infection, and a compromised soft tissue envelope are common in these patients. We describe 15 cases that underwent blade plate fixation as salvage for a nonunion around the ankle, including patient/nonunion characteristics, Nonunion Scoring System (NUSS), surgical technique, healing rate, complications, and long-term follow-up with 2 patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series from a level 1 trauma referral center. We included all patients that underwent blade plate fixation for a long-standing nonunion of the distal tibia, talus, or failed subtalar fusion. All patients had autogenous bone grafting, including 14 with posterior iliac crest grafts and 2 with femoral reamer irrigator aspirator grafting. Median follow-up was 24.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7.7-40). Main outcome measures were (time to) union, and functional outcomes using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). RESULTS: We included 15 adults with a median age of 58 years (IQR, 54-62). The median NUSS score at the time of index surgery was 46 (IQR, 34-54). Union was achieved after the index procedure in 11 of 15 patients. Additional surgery was performed in 4 of 15 patients. Union was achieved in all patients at a median of 4.2 months (IQR, 2.9-11). The median score for the PCS was 38 (IQR, 34-48, range 17-58, P = .009), for the MCS 52 (IQR, 45-60, range 33-62, P = .701), and for the FAOS 73 (IQR, 48-83). CONCLUSION: In this series, our use of blade plate fixation with autogenous grafting was an effective method for managing a nonunion around the ankle allowing for alignment correction, stable compression and fixation, union, and fair patient-reported outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic.

Accuracy and Reliability of MRI Reports in Diagnosing the Symptomatic Knee in Patients Who Had Bilateral MRI.

Background: Newly symptomatic chronic musculoskeletal illness is often misinterpreted as new pathology, particularly when symptoms are first noticed after an event. In this study, we were interested in the accuracy and reliability of identifying the symptomatic knee based on bilateral MRI reports. Methods: We selected a consecutive sample of 30 occupational injury claimants, presenting with unilateral knee symptoms who had bilateral MRI on the same date. A group of blinded musculoskeletal radiologists dictated diagnostic reports, and all members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) were asked to indicate the symptomatic side based on the blinded reports. We compared diagnostic accuracy in a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model, and calculated interobserver agreement using Fleiss' kappa. Results: Seventy-six surgeons completed the survey. The sensitivity of diagnosing the symptomatic side was 63%, the specificity was 58%, the positive predictive value was 70%, and the negative predictive value was 51%. There was slight agreement among observers (kappa= 0.17). Case descriptions did not improve diagnostic accuracy (Odds Ratio: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.3; P=0.65). Conclusion: Identifying the more symptomatic knee in adults based on MRI is unreliable and has limited accuracy, with or without information about demographics and mechanism of injury. When there is a dispute concerning the extent of the injury to a knee in a litigious, medico-legal setting such as Workers' Compensation, consideration should be given to obtaining a comparison MRI of the uninjured, asymptomatic extremity.

The influence of dominant limb involvement on DASH and QuickDASH.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether involvement of the dominant limb affects Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. METHODS: A convenience sample of 948 patients from 12 prospective studies that recorded hand dominance, affected side, diagnosis, and a DASH or QuickDASH score was used to assess the influence of involvement of the dominant limb on DASH scores. Diagnosis was categorized as traumatic and nontraumatic. Region was categorized as hand and wrist, elbow, and arm and shoulder. RESULTS: In bivariate analysis, involvement of the dominant limb, diagnosis, region, and sex had significant influence on DASH/QuickDASH score. In multivariable analysis, dominant hand condition, traumatic diagnosis, arm and shoulder involvement, and female sex were associated with significantly higher DASH scores (more disability), but accounted for only 10 % of the variability in scores. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity disability as measured by the DASH is slightly, but significantly greater when the dominant limb is involved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II.