Real-time image and time-lapse technology to select the single blastocyst to transfer in assisted reproductive cycles.

The success of an assisted reproduction cycle should be the achievement of a healthy singleton live birth following the replacement of one embryo. Therefore, one of the most critical points for embryologists has been the selection criteria and how to choose the best embryo to transfer with high implantation potential. In this vein, morphological evaluation has been historically the method applied. However, this practice relies on a limited number of single observations and is associated with high operator variability. Recently, a major innovation in embryo culture has been the introduction of a new type of incubator with integrated time-lapse monitoring, which enables the embryologist to analyze the dynamic events of embryo development, from fertilization to blastocyst formation. This novel practice is quickly growing and has been implemented in many IVF clinics worldwide. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to illustrate the benefits of time-lapse technology in a modern embryology laboratory. In particular, we discuss the blastocyst collapse(s) event and morphometric blastocyst assessment and analyse their association with embryo viability and implantation potential.

Considerations on staffing levels for a modern assisted reproductive laboratory.

The duties recently performed in the embryology laboratory have deeply increased compared to those realized a couple of decades ago. Currently, procedures include conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ICSI techniques, or processing of surgically retrieved sperm, embryo culture and time-lapse monitoring, blastocyst culture, as well as trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing and cryopreservation. These techniques require not only time, but also high knowledge level and acutely concentration by the embryologist team. The existing data indicate that an IVF laboratory need to have adequate staffing levels to perform the required daily duties, and to work in optimal conditions that are critical to assure a high quality service, as well as avoiding incidents and to provide the best outcomes. As a result, IVF clinics have invested in human resources, but there is still a large discrepancy between IVF centres on the number of embryologists employed. Currently there is no golden standard on the human resource requirements for assisted reproductive technology procedures; therefore, in this review paper we aim to provide arguments to take into account to determine the embryology staffing requirements in an embryology laboratory to assure optimal safety and efficiency of operations.

Review of the impact of COVID-19 on male reproduction, and its implications on assisted reproductive technology services.

The announcement in 2019 of a new coronavirus disease that quickly became a major pandemic, is an exceptional challenge to healthcare systems never seen before. Such a public health emergency can largely influence various aspects of people's health as well as reproductive outcome. IVF specialists should be vigilant, monitoring the situation whilst contributing by sharing novel evidence to counsel patients, both pregnant women and would-be mothers. Coronavirus infection might adversely affect pregnant women and their offspring. Consequently, this review paper aims to analyse its potential risks for reproductive health, as well as potential effects of the virus on gamete function and embryo development. In addition, reopening fertility clinics poses several concerns that need immediate addressing, such as the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on reproductive cells and also the potential risk of cross-contamination and viral transmission. Therefore, this manuscript summarizes what is currently known about the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on medically assisted reproductive treatments and its effect on reproductive health and pregnancy.

New candidate genes to predict pregnancy outcome in single embryo transfer cycles when using cumulus cell gene expression.

OBJECTIVE: To relate the gene expression in cumulus cells surrounding an oocyte to the potential of the oocyte, as evaluated by the embryo morphology (days 3 and 5) and pregnancy obtained in single-embryo transfer cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individual human cumulus complexes using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for 11 genes. SETTING: University hospital IVF center. PATIENT(S): Thirty-three intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients, of which 16 were pregnant (4 biochemical and 12 live birth). INTERVENTION(S): Gene expression analysis in human cumulus complexes collected individually at pickup, allowing a correlation with the outcome of the corresponding oocyte. Multiparametric models were built for embryo morphology parameters and pregnancy prediction to find the most predictive genes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gene expression profile of 99 cumulus complexes for 11 genes. RESULT(S): For embryo morphology prediction, TRPM7, ITPKA, STC2, CYP11A1, and HSD3B1 were often retained as informative. Models for pregnancy-biochemical or live birth-complemented or not with patient and cycle characteristics, always retained EFNB2 and CAMK1D together with STC1 or STC2. Positive and negative predictive values of the live birth models were >85%. CONCLUSION(S): EFNB2 and CAMK1D are promising genes that could help to choose the embryo to transfer with the highest chance of a pregnancy.

Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the impact of different gonadotrophin preparations on embryo quality. METHODS: This evaluation was part of a randomized, assessor-blind, multinational trial, conducted in 731 women undergoing IVF after stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG; MENOPUR) (n = 363) or recombinant FSH (rFSH; GONAL-F) (n = 368). Ongoing pregnancy was the primary end-point [HP-hMG 27% and rFSH 22%; odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, CI) 1.25 (0.89-1.75)]. All 7535 oocytes retrieved were evaluated daily until day 3 (embryo transfer) in a blinded manner both by local site embryologists and a central panel of three embryologists. RESULTS: The proportion of top-quality embryos per oocyte retrieved was higher with HP-hMG (11.3%) compared with rFSH (9.0%) (P = 0.044) in the local assessment, but comparable in the central assessment (9.5 and 8.0%, respectively). Significant differences in favour of HP-hMG were observed for number of blastomeres and degree of fragmentation, while uniformity of blastomere sizes, localization of fragments, frequency of multinucleation and homogeneous cytoplasm were comparable between HP-hMG and rFSH. The live birth, ongoing pregnancy and ongoing implantation rates for top-quality embryos were higher with HP-hMG than rFSH [48 versus 32% (P = 0.038), 48 versus 32% (P = 0.038), 41 versus 27% (P = 0.032)]. Both the proportion of embryos with at least 50% surviving blastomeres after cryopreservation and embryos resuming mitosis were more frequent with HP-hMG compared with rFSH. CONCLUSIONS: Composition of gonadotrophin preparations used during ovarian stimulation has an impact on some embryo quality parameters. The capacity to implant of the top-quality embryos derived from stimulation with HP-hMG appears to be improved, although the mechanism needs to be elucidated.

Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to determine the inter- and intraobserver agreement when assessing embryo quality. METHODS: This investigation included 4002 cleaved embryos from 7535 oocytes retrieved in 688 patients undergoing IVF cycles in a multicentre trial. Embryos were evaluated locally at the inverted microscope at 28, 44 and 68 h (+/-1 h) post-insemination. Digital images of the embryos were assessed centrally by three blinded embryologists. To assess reproducibility, 215 randomly selected cleaved embryos from 33 patients were re-evaluated by the three central embryologists. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement among the central embryologists (using the same method of evaluation; 2D images) was good for classification of top-quality embryos (kappa 0.71-0.73), excellent for classification of normally developed embryos (kappa 0.83-0.86) and good-excellent for classification of transferable embryos (kappa 0.78-0.82). The interobserver agreement between local and consolidated central assessment (different methods of evaluation, inverted microscopy versus 2D images) was good for all three embryo classifications (kappa 0.64-0.79). The intraobserver reproducibility for all three overall embryo classifications was excellent for the consolidated central assessment (kappa 0.80-0.91). CONCLUSION: Embryo quality can be determined with a good degree of interobserver agreement independently of the method of evaluation. Embryologists classify embryos with excellent intraobserver reproducibility.