Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Herz ; 42(1): 3-10, 2017 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28101622

ABSTRACT

Vasoactive drugs and inotropic agents are important for the hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock. In this article the use of different vasoactive and ionotropic drugs in cardiogenic shock is presented. Hemodynamic management during cardiogenic shock occurs after initial moderate volume delivery by dobutamine to increase inotropism. If adequate perfusion pressures are not achieved norepinephrine is administered. If a sufficient increase in cardiac performance can still not be achieved by the treatment, administration of levosimendan or phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors may be necessary. Levosimendan is superior to PDE inhibitors for patients in cardiogenic shock. The aim of hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock is to allow the transient use of inotropics and vasopressors in the lowest necessary dose and only as long as necessary. The daily question is whether the dose can be reduced or in the case of deterioration whether the use of an extracorporeal circulatory support system should be considered. There are currently no available data on mortality that demonstrate the benefit of hemodynamic monitoring using target criteria. The advantage, however, results from the economic use of inotropics and vasopressors by certain target criteria.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
2.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 111(4): 267-78, 2016 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27165978

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of infective endocarditis is often delayed in clinical practice. Timely diagnosis and rapid antibiotic treatment is important. Higher age of patients, new risk factors, and increasing use of intravascular prosthetic materials resulted in changes in microbial spectrum. Nowadays, nonspecific symptoms, critically ill patients, and immunocompromised patients require a high level of diagnostic expertise.The new guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology provide various diagnostic algorithms and recommendations for antibiotic treatment. The new guidelines also recommend the formation of an endocarditis team with various medical disciplines, including a cardiac surgeon, to improve treatment because in half of all endocarditis patients, antibiotic therapy alone does not result in successful management of the infection. If complications occur, early surgical treatment should be performed.In this overview, diagnostic strategies and therapeutic approaches for the treatment of infectious endocarditis according to the current guidelines and aspects of surgical treatment are provided.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Intensive Care Units , Bacteriological Techniques , Delayed Diagnosis , Echocardiography , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endocarditis/etiology , Endocarditis/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Risk Factors
3.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 111(1): 22-8, 2016 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809564

ABSTRACT

Patients with cardiogenic shock pose a challenge to physicians due to cardiorespiratory instability in addition to the underlying medical condition. If analgosedation and ventilation are indicated, commonly administered drugs themselves often influence hemodynamics and oxygenation. The present article provides an overview of the available substances with consideration of the patients' condition, then monitoring and optimization of analgosedation.


Subject(s)
Conscious Sedation/methods , Critical Care/methods , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Oxygen/blood , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Risk Factors
4.
Internist (Berl) ; 56(6): 702, 704-8, 710-2, 2015 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054838

ABSTRACT

Vasoactive drugs and inotropes are important in the hemodynamic management of patients with cardiogenic shock despite modest volume administration. Currently, the concept of cardiac relief is pursued in the treatment of acute heart failure. In this article we present the use of different drugs in the intensive care unit for acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. In acute heart failure catecholamines are only used during the transition from heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Here, the therapeutic concept of ventricular unloading is more sought after. This can be achieved by the use of diuretics, nitrates, levosimendan (inodilatator), or in the future serelaxin. The hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock occurs after moderate volume administration with dobutamine to increase inotropy. If no adequate perfusion pressures are achieved, norepinephrine can be administered as a vasopressor. If there is still no sufficient increase in cardiac output, the inodilatator levosimendan can be used. Levosimendan instead of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in this case is preferable. The maxim of hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock is the transient use of inotropes and vasopressors in the lowest dose possible and only for as long as necessary. This means that one should continuously check whether the dose can be reduced. There are no mortality data demonstrating the utility of hemodynamic monitoring based on objective criteria­but it makes sense to use inotropes and vasopressors sparingly.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/trends , Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Critical Care/trends , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heart Failure/prevention & control , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eur J Dermatol ; 16(5): 494-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17101468

ABSTRACT

The hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia) designates acute, painful erythemas of the palms and soles of the feet caused by antineoplastic chemotherapies. The most frequent trigger substances are 5-fluoruracil and its derivates. At maximum severity, the HFS is bullous to erosive or ulcerous in character. The pathogenesis has not yet been clarified. Histologically, the HFS is characterized by a toxic keratinocyte reaction. Furthermore, there is sub-basal edema with a tendency to bullae, dilated blood and lymph capillaries and usually only mild perivascular lymphocytic infiltration. Early recognition and delineation from other differential diagnoses is prerequisite to targeted management of the disease. Depending on the severity, HFS requires dose reduction, interruption or switch in the antineoplastic chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Erythema/chemically induced , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Paresthesia/chemically induced , Diagnosis, Differential , Erythema/diagnosis , Erythema/epidemiology , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Paresthesia/diagnosis , Paresthesia/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/ultrastructure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...