A multicentre retrospective comparison of central nervous system prophylaxis strategies among patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating complication; the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL with high risk for CNS relapse as defined by two or more of: multiple extranodal sites, elevated serum LDH and B symptoms or involvement of specific high-risk anatomical sites. We compared three different strategies of CNS-directed therapy: intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) with (R)-CHOP 'group 1'; R-CHOP with IT MTX and two cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) MTX 'group 2'; dose-intensive systemic antimetabolite-containing chemotherapy (Hyper-CVAD or CODOXM/IVAC) with IT/IV MTX 'group 3'. RESULTS: Overall, 217 patients were identified (49, 125 and 43 in groups 1-3, respectively). With median follow-up of 3.4 (range 0.2-18.6) years, 23 CNS relapses occurred (12, 10 and 1 in groups 1-3 respectively). The 3-year actuarial rates (95% CI) of CNS relapse were 18.4% (9.5-33.1%), 6.9% (3.5-13.4%) and 2.3% (0.4-15.4%) in groups 1-3, respectively (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of high-dose IV MTX and/or cytarabine was associated with lower incidence of CNS relapse compared with IT chemotherapy alone. However, these data are limited by their retrospective nature and warrant confirmation in prospective randomised studies.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following fludarabine combination chemotherapy.

Fludarabine combination chemotherapy achieves high response rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent lymphoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of treatment-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML) after treatment with fludarabine in combination for lymphoproliferative disorders and identify risk factors for its development. In all, 176 patients treated with fludarabine combination were followed for a median of 41 months (range 6-125 months). In all, 19 cases of t-MDS/AML have been identified for an overall rate of 10.8%. Median overall survival post-t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 11 months. Patients developing t-MDS/AML included 11/54 with follicular lymphoma (FL) (crude rate 20.4%), 5/82 with CLL (6.1%) and 3/24 with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia or marginal zone lymphoma (12.5%). Most patients had other cytotoxic treatments (median 4, range 0-7) but three with FL had fludarabine combination as their only line of treatment. Of the eleven patients (6.3%) who received mitoxantrone with their first fludarabine combination, four (36.4%) developed t-MDS/AML (P=0.007). There was a trend toward prior cytotoxic therapy increasing the risk for t-MDS/AML (P=0.067). Fludarabine combination chemotherapy is associated with a moderate risk of t-MDS/AML particularly when combined with mitoxantrone. This complication should be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of this treatment in lymphoproliferative disorders.

Cardiovascular toxicity is increased, but manageable, during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for patients aged 60 years and older.

High-dose therapy (HDT) for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) is considered a feasible option for patients aged 60 years. This study compared the outcomes for all patients aged 60 years treated with HDT at the center to a matched cohort group aged <60 years. Results for patients who were 60 years at HDT between 1997--2002 were retrospectively analysed to assess efficacy and safety. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared with a cohort group, matched by disease type, chemotherapy sensitivity, year of treatment and conditioning regimen. Patients with NHL were also matched by International Prognostic Index score. Forty patients aged 60 years were identified. Median age was 65 (range 60--76) with 22 MM and 18 NHL; 50% had 1 or more co-morbidity; 35% had cardiovascular co-morbidity vs. 18% of controls (p=0.075). Response rates (RR) following HDT for MM were: 4 (18%) complete responses (CR) and 18 (82%) partial responses (PR), giving an overall response rate (ORR) of 100%, vs. 77% for controls (p=0.02). For NHL patients there were: 8 CR (44%) and 4 PR (22%), giving an ORR of 67%, vs. 83% for controls (p=0.3). Transplant-related mortality was 8% compared to 5% in controls (p=0.6). Toxicities were similar with the exception of cardiac toxicity, which was significantly higher in patients aged 60 years vs. controls (50% grade 3 vs. 10%: p<0.0001). Atrial fibrillation was the most frequent cardiovascular toxicity (9 patients). At a median follow-up of 33 months, there is no significant difference between older vs. younger patients in median EFS (24 vs. 38 months: p=0.78) or OS (40 months vs. not reached: p=0.23). HDT is feasible and effective in selected patients 60 years with MM and NHL. Patients 60 years are more susceptible to cardiovascular toxicities, particularly atrial fibrillation, but have similar or better response rates following HDT and similar long-term outcomes to younger patients.

Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that repeated cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT), can be supported by unmanipulated autologous PBPC. Here we investigate whether purified CD34+ cells, obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the Isolex 300i device, can support such therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer had PBPC mobilized and harvested following chemotherapy and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day). Patients with > 4.0 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in the apheresis product underwent CD34-selection using the Isolex 300i (v2.0) device. All cells collected were equally divided into three aliquots and cryopreserved. Patients who did not achieve this threshold had unmanipulated cells collected and stored. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and either ifosfamide (10 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2). It was intended for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e 1/3 for each cycle) and to compare hemopoietic recovery between patients receiving CD34-selected cells or unmanipulated cells. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 29 patients (45%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells to undergo CD34-selection. The remaining 16 patients underwent CD34-selection with a median purity of 84.3% (range: 16.3-96.1%) and yield of 34% (range: 1-60%). Fifteen of these patients proceeded to HDT and 42 of the planned 45 cycles were administered. Nine patients had all three HDT cycles supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (range: 0.04-3.01). Three of the 15 patients required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of delayed neutrophil recovery. Of the 13 patients whose PBPCs did not undergo CD34+ cell selection, 11 proceeded to HDT with a median of 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range: 2.0-4.4) unselected cells infused per cycle and 31 of 33 planned cycles were delivered. When hemopoietic recovery was compared between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 34) and unmanipulated cells (n = 31), there was a modest slowing in the patients receiving CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 x 10(9)/L = 11 days versus 10 days (P = 0.0122) and platelets > 20 x 10(9)/L = 14 days versus 13 days (P = 0.0009). No difference in recovery to 50 x 10(9)/L was observed (P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells are capable of supporting multiple cycles of HDT. However, we were unable to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells to perform this processing in 45% (13/29) of patients and further improvements in yield are required to overcome the modest delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery.

CliniMACS CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, following high-dose therapy (HDT), unmanipulated autologous PBPC are infused. Alternatively, purified CD34+ cells can now be obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the CliniMACS device. Limited data currently exist examining hemopoietic recovery with such cells. METHODS: Ten patients with advanced breast cancer had PBPC mobilized with docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day), harvested and processed using the CliniMACS CD34-selection device and equally divided into three aliquots for cryopreservation. Unmanipulated 'back-up' cells were also collected on a separate day of the same mobilization, divided into three and cryopreserved. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2). The intent was for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e., 1/3 for each cycle). If, however, hemopoietic recovery was delayed after Cycle 1, 1/3 of the unmanipulated cells were infused following Cycle 2 and the remaining CD34-selected cells (2/3) were used to support Cycle 3. RESULTS: PBPC from 10 patients underwent CD34-selection with a resulting median purity of 93% (range: 76-98%) and yield of 62% (range: 16-93%). Of the 10 patients, only two were able to be supported with CD34-selected cells for all three cycles of HDT. The remaining eight patients required unmanipulated 'back-up' cells to support Cycle 2. Three patients also required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of persistent neutropenia (n = 1) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycles initially supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (0.7-2.6) (n = 20) and unselected cells was 1.7 (1.4-2.8) (n = 10). Comparing hemopoietic recovery between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 20) and unmanipulated cells (n = 10) there was a significant slowing with the CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 = 13 days versus 10 days, platelets > 20 = 17 days versus 13 days, > 50 = 25 versus 17 days (all P values < 0.001). There was no correlation between the dose of CD34-selected cells infused and neutrophil/platelet recovery. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that, although unmanipulated PBPC achieve rapid hemopoietic recovery (at modest CD34 doses of < or = 2.8 x 10(6)/kg), CliniMACS-selected CD34+ cells (in the doses utilized in this study of < or = 2.6 x 10(6)/kg) result in significantly prolonged recovery.

Intrathecal chemotherapy alone is inadequate central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is usually fatal despite therapy and effective prophylaxis is desirable. Patients at high-risk usually receive intrathecal (i.t.) prophylaxis, although its efficacy is unproven. We therefore analyzed the outcome of all patients with newly diagnosed "intermediate-grade" NHL receiving i.t. prophylaxis from 1991 to 1999. Twenty-six patients were identified and analyzed. All were free of CNS involvement at diagnosis with negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Disease stage was IE in 7, and IV in 19, with a median of two extranodal sites involved. Serum lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 65%, and the median International Prognostic Factors Index score was 3 (range 0-5). Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was used in all cases and included high-dose methotrexate +/- ara-C in six patients. The median number of i.t. treatments was 5 (range 1-12) and comprised methotrexate +/- steroid in 15, together with ara-C in 11. The actuarial 3-year CNS-relapse rate was 26 +/- 10%. Six CNS-relapses were observed and involved the spinal cord or brain parenchyma in two cases each, and the leptomeninges in four patients. Treatment-related variables associated with higher CNS-relapse rates (34-50%) were: delay of > or = 14 days from diagnosis to first i.t. injection, < 5 i.t. treatments, delay of i.t. prophylaxis until after attaining CR and systemic treatment lacking high-dose methotrexate +/- ara-C (each P < or = 0.17). I.t. CNS prophylaxis, as used here, was inadequate. Alternative approaches should be pursued.

High-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for lymphoma: The Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience.

BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or blood cell transplantation for the treatment of lymphoma commenced at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute in 1986. AIM: To examine the patient characteristics and outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) treated with HDT and autologous transplantation at our Institute in the first 10 years of the service (1986-95). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed examining patient characteristics, prior chemotherapy regimens, pretransplant disease status, HDT regimen, source of stem cells, time for haematopoietic recovery, complications of transplantation, response rates, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with NHL were treated with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32-56%) and PFS rate of 34% (95% CI 21-44%). Factors independently predictive of an unfavourable PFS on multivariate analyses were presence of constitutional symptoms at transplant (P < 0.002) and chemotherapy-resistant disease at transplant (P = 0.02). Twenty-three patients with HD were treated with a 5-year predicted OS rate of 74% (95% CI 56-92%) and PFS rate of 57% (95% CI 36-77%). There was no difference in PFS for HD patients who relapsed either within 12 months of completion of front-line therapy or after this time (P= 0.5). The transplant-related mortality for the entire cohort was 17%, with a progressive decrease over time. CONCLUSION: HDT with autologous transplantation achieves durable PFS and OS in patients with lymphoma. Improved patient selection, therapy modifications according to prognostic factors and ongoing improvements in supportive care should improve outcomes further.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel delivered every 35 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. Eighteen patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 54 treatment cycles, 44 were delivered and 11 patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were interstitial pneumonitis and mucositis with moderately severe diarrhea (n = 3) and rash (n = 3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 17 patients with evaluable disease, 16 patients responded with six patients achieving a complete remission and an additional four patients achieving no detectable disease (negative restaging including PET scan) but a persistently abnormal bone scan. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival was 11 months with the median overall survival not reached. The recommended doses for phase II/III studies are cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2).

Docetaxel effectively mobilizes peripheral blood CD34+ cells.

We prospectively evaluated docetaxel (100 mg/m2) with G-CSF (10 microg/kg S.C., daily) for mobilization efficiency in 26 patients with breast cancer. The minimum target yield was >4.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (optimum = 9 x 10(6)/kg), sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT). The peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were day 8 and day 9. Seven collections began on day 7, 16 on day 8 and three on day 9. The median peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) CD34+ cell content ranged from 1.2 to 5.9 x 10(6)/kg per day during days 7 to 11 with a median CD34+ content of the total 72 PBPC collections of 3.4 x 10(6)/kg (0.07-15.6). Fifteen patients obtained a PBPC collection exceeding 5 x 10(6)/kg on a single day of collection. Following a median 3 days collection for each patient (range 2-4), the median total CD34+ for all individual sets of collections was 9.7 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.0-28.4). We were able to achieve the minimum CD34+ cell target yield in 22 of 26 patients with one cycle of mobilisation chemotherapy and in two of these patients a second collection yielded sufficient cells. Twenty-two patients have subsequently received repetitive HDT and PBPC transplantation with 57 cycles of HDT having been delivered. For all 57 cycles, the median time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l and 1.0 x 10(9)/l was 10 days (range 8-22) and 11 days (range 8-23), respectively. The median time to platelets greater than 20 x 10(9)/l, 50 x 10(9)/l and 100 x 10(9)/l was 13 days (range 11-23), 17 days (range 12-53) and 23 days (range 18-70), respectively. We conclude that docetaxel with G-CSF effectively mobilises PBPCs with apheresis needing to be commenced approximately 8 days after docetaxel administration.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and conventional-dose paclitaxel delivered every 28 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 69 treatment cycles, 59 were delivered and fifteen patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were renal tubular acidosis, encephalopathy, mucositis and enterocolitis. There was one treatment-related hemorrhagic death. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses for phase II or III studies are ifosfamide (10 g/m2), thiotepa (350 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2).

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.

Correlation of cytogenetics, BCR-ABL PCR studies and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Philadelphia positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) accounts for 11-29% of adult ALL. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the BCR-ABL fusion mRNA has identified patients with the fusion mRNA without cytogenetic evidence of the 9;22 translocation. The reason for discrepancies between cytogenetic and molecular diagnoses is unclear. AIM: Our aim was to study cases of ALL with discordant cytogenetic and RT-PCR results and identify any reasons for such discrepancies. METHODS: Laboratory records were scanned for cases of ALL tested by both RT-PCR and cytogenetics and positive by either for the 9;22 translocation. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to study discordant results where a specimen was available. RESULTS: We identified 15 patients with ALL who had both cytogenetic and RT-PCR studies for BCR-ABL. Seven had discordant results; five patients had positive RT-PCR studies with normal (four/five) or abnormal but Ph negative cytogenetics (one/five), and two were Ph+ but RT-PCR negative. FISH, using Vysis LSI bcr/abl translocation probes, showed fused signals in 12% interphase cells but not in metaphase cells in one specimen with normal cytogenetics, and 6% interphase cells in the Ph negative patient with abnormal cytogenetics. This second patient subsequently relapsed with a minor Ph+ cell line derived from the Ph negative line. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed the need for both cytogenetics and RT-PCR to identify Ph+ ALL. FISH did not show sub-microscopic rearrangements of BCR-ABL in normal metaphases. Failure to identify the Philadelphia chromosome cytogenetically appeared due rather to Ph+ cells failing to divide.

Molecular diagnosis of Philadelphia negative CML using the polymerase chain reaction and DNA analysis: clinical features and course of M-bcr negative and M-bcr positive CML.

The Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) is the cytogenetic hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and as such has been used to confirm the diagnosis of CML based on morphological and clinical criteria. We have investigated 12 patients who were considered to have clinical and morphological features of CML and who did not have detectable abnormalities of chromosomes 9q34 or 22q11. In six of the 12 patients, rearrangement within the 5.8 kb major breakpoint region (M-bcr) and amplification of CML specific M-bcr-ABL cDNA sequences by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was demonstrated. Six other CML patients did not have rearrangement of the M-bcr gene or amplification of BCR-ABL by PCR. These patients had atypical CML. They were significantly older, most had less than 10% immature granulocytic cells (metamyelocytes, myelocytes and promyelocytes) and had various degrees of marrow fibrosis. Three of these six patients died of blastic transformation at 4, 15 and 54 months from diagnosis.

Differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic disorders. Is differentiation-induction therapy possible?

In this review we have discussed the data which indicates that differentiation can indeed occur to a limited degree in the neoplastic cells in acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Attempts to increase the degree of differentiation as an approach to the treatment of these disorders have utilised a variety of chemical agents which have been reported to exert such an effect in vitro. Analysis of the results, however, indicates that beneficial effects of these agents in patients is due to cytotoxic action which selectively reduces the neoplastic cell population. Leukemic cells can also undergo incomplete differentiation in vitro when exposed to appropriate growth factors, which raises the question of whether leukemia and myelodysplasia can be treated by the induction of differentiation in the malignant cells following the administration of these agents. This question, and questions about the nature of complete remission, will be answered in the coming years by clinical trials of growth factors, and further studies of the DNA in mature cells to analyse whether these cells are derived from leukemic progenitors.