Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 7(6): 950-4, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19344363

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis compliance according to time of admission in a medical intensive care unit (MICU). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a closed tertiary MICU. We classified patients into three groups (week days, weekends, and week nights), according to time of admission. An unweighted risk factor score (RFS) was calculated from 20 known risk factors. We defined DVT prophylaxis compliance as any type of prophylaxis (mechanical or pharmacologic) for RFS 3. Non-compliance was defined as no prophylaxis or single-type prophylaxis for RFS > 3. RESULTS: We analyzed 105 admissions. Eighty (76.19%) patients received compliant DVT prophylaxis, and 25 (23.81%) patients received non-compliant regimens of whom 11 (10.48%) were not on any prophylaxis. DVT prophylaxis compliance was not different across the three admission groups. The non-compliant DVT prophylaxis group had a higher RFS (3.48 +/- 2.1 vs. 2.25 +/- 1.5; P = 0.011), a trend towards fewer female patients (40% vs. 60%; P = 0.079), and a higher percentage of admissions by interns at the first postgraduate year (PGY) level (28% vs. 5.4%; P = 0.01). Logistic regression revealed that only RFS and PGY level were independent predictors for compliance (P = 0.015 and 0.005 respectively). Time of admission was not a significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Time of admission did not influence DVT prophylaxis compliance. Compliance improved with higher PGY level and lower RFS. A higher level of knowledge probably explains the association with PGY level; however, we cannot explain the inverse relationship between RFS and compliance.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Intensive Care Units , Patient Admission , Time Factors , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies
2.
Compr Ther ; 26(4): 294-7, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11126101

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnea remains an unrecognized and under appreciated disease. The reported prevalence ranges from 2% to 10%. Risk factors include obesity, increased neck circumference, and certain ethnic groups. An apnea index > 20 is associated with higher mortality rate.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Endocrine System Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/mortality , Stroke/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...