Segmental lineage restrictions in the chick embryo spinal cord depend on the adjacent somites.

We have investigated whether the developing spinal cord is intrinsically segmented in its rostrocaudal (anteroposterior) axis by mapping the spread of clones derived from single labelled cells within the neural tube of the chick embryo. A single cell in the ventrolateral neural tube of the trunk was marked in situ with the fluorescent tracer lysinated rhodamine dextran (LRD) and its descendants located after two days of further incubation. We find that clones derived from cells labelled before overt segmentation of the adjacent mesoderm do not respect any boundaries within the neural tube. Those derived from cells marked after mesodermal segmentation, however, never cross an invisible boundary aligned with the middle of each somite, and tend to be elongated along the mediolateral axis of the neural tube. When the somite pattern is surgically disturbed, neighbouring clones derived from neuroectodermal cells labelled after somite formation behave like clones derived from younger cells: they no longer respect any boundaries, and are not elongated mediolaterally. These results indicate that periodic lineage restrictions do exist in the developing spinal cord of the chick embryo, but their maintenance requires the presence of the adjacent somite mesoderm.

An evaluation of myelomeres and segmentation of the chick embryo spinal cord.

We have investigated whether the neuromeres of the developing chick spinal cord (myelomeres) are manifestations of intrinsic segmentation of the CNS by studying the patterns of cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Treatment of 2-day embryos with colchicine does produce exaggerated myelomeres, in confirmation of Källén (Z. Anat. Entwickl.-Gesch. 123, 309-319, 1962). However, this does not imply that myelomeres are segmental proliferation centres: the undulations caused by colchicine are irregular alongside the unsegmented mesoderm, and another mitotic inhibitor, bromodeoxyuridine, has no such effects. In contrast to lower vertebrate embryos, there is no evidence for segmental groups of primary motor neurons in the chick: the earliest motor neurons express cholinesterase, and project their axons into the adjacent sclerotome, at random positions in relation to the somite boundaries. The population of motor neurons projecting HRP-labelled axons into a single somite lies out of phase with both myelomere and somite, and is placed symmetrically about the anterior half-sclerotome. The earliest intrinsic spinal cord neurons, as stained with zinc iodide-osmium tetroxide or anti-68 x Mr neurofilament antibody, show no segmental patterns of differentiation. We conclude that, in contrast to the rhombomeres of the developing hindbrain, myelomeres are not matched by segmental groupings of differentiating nerve cells, and result from mechanical moulding of the neuroepithelium by the neighbouring somites.

Axon repulsion during peripheral nerve segmentation.

The guidance of axons during embryonic development is likely to involve both adhesive and repulsive interactions between growth cones and their environment. We are characterising the role and mechanism of repulsion during the segmental outgrowth of motor and sensory axons in the somite mesoderm of chick embryos. Axons are confined to the anterior half of each somite by the expression in the posterior half of a glycoconjugate system (48 x 10(3) M(r) and 55 x 10(3) M(r)) that causes the collapse of dorsal root ganglion growth cones when applied in vitro. Enzymatic cleavage of this fraction with specific combinations of endo- and exoglycosidases removes collapse activity, suggesting that carbohydrate residues are involved in the execution of collapse. A similar activity is also detectable in normal adult grey matter, suggesting roles for repulsion beyond the development of spinal nerve segmentation.