ABSTRACT
Introducción: El compromiso del líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) en hemopatías malignas es un marcador de mal pronóstico y es habitualmente estudiado por citometría de flujo o citología. Ocasionalmente, las muestras de LCR oligocelulares (≤ 5 céls/dL) pueden ser consideradas como no aptas para diagnóstico por la baja cantidad de eventos. Objetivo: Evaluar la proporción de muestras reportadas como valorables para diagnóstico obtenidas por citometría y citología en muestras de LCR oligocelular. Material y Métodos: Se seleccionaron 169 muestras de LCR oligocelular correspondientes a 115 pacientes con hemopatías malignas. Las muestras fueron obtenidas mediante punción lumbar en tubos acondicionados con EDTA y preservante celular (Transfix®). El inmunofenotipo se realizó con panel de 8 colores, 55 (32%) de las cuales se hizo con panel para pequeñas muestras (SST). En todos los casos se incluyó CD14 para identificación de monocitos y CD3 para linfocitos T. La adquisición se realizó en citómetro FACSCantoII® y el análisis en software Infinicyt®. Resultados: La proporción de muestras valorables fue mayor en citometría en comparación con la citología (98% vs 61%, p < 0,000). En la mayoría se identificaron linfocitos T (98%) y/o monocitos (90%). En las muestras con SST, la cantidad de eventos obtenida fue menor en muestras con < de 1 mL (140 vs 556, p < 0,001) y se logró identificar una mediana de 3 poblaciones celulares. Conclusión: La citometría proporciona una mayor cantidad de muestras valorables en los LCR paucicelulares en relación con la citología en muestras de LCR enviadas para estudio de compromiso de LCR por hemopatías malignas.
Background: The alteration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in hematologic neoplasms is a poor prognostic marker. The characteristics of CSF are usually analyzed by flow cytometry or cytology. However, paucicellular CSF samples (≤5 cells/dL) can sometimes be considered unsuitable for analysis due to the low number of events. Objective: To evaluate the proportion of samples reported as suitable for analysis obtained by cytometry (FCM) and cytology in paucicellular CSF samples. Material and Methods: 169 samples ofpaucicellular CSF corresponding to 115 patients with hematologic neoplasms were selected. The samples were obtained by lumbar puncture in tubes conditioned with EDTA and Transfix®. We characterized the immunophenotype ofCSF samples with an 8-color panel, and 55 samples (32%) were in a small sample tube (SST). In all cases, monocytes were identified by CD14 labeling and T lymphocytes by CD3 labeling. The acquisition was carried out in a FACSCantoII® cytometer, and the analysis was performed using Infinicyt® software. Results: The proportion of samples suitable for analysis was higher in FCM compared to cytology (98% vs 61%, p < 0.000). We identified the presence of T lymphocytes and/or monocytes in most samples (98% and 90%, respectively). In the SST samples, the number of events recorded in low-volume samples (< 1 mL) was lower than in samples with higher volume (140 vs 556, p < 0.001), with a median of identification of 3 cell populations. Conclusion: FCM allows the analysis of a higher proportion ofpaucicellular CSF samples than cytology in hematologic neoplasms study.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The alteration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in hematologic neoplasms is a poor prognostic marker. The characteristics of CSF are usually analyzed by flow cytometry or cytology. However, paucicellular CSF samples (≤5 cells/dL) can sometimes be considered unsuitable for analysis due to the low number of events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of samples reported as suitable for analysis obtained by cytometry (FCM) and cytology in paucicellular CSF samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 169 samples ofpaucicellular CSF corresponding to 115 patients with hematologic neoplasms were selected. The samples were obtained by lumbar puncture in tubes conditioned with EDTA and Transfix®. We characterized the immunophenotype ofCSF samples with an 8-color panel, and 55 samples (32%) were in a small sample tube (SST). In all cases, monocytes were identified by CD14 labeling and T lymphocytes by CD3 labeling. The acquisition was carried out in a FACSCantoII® cytometer, and the analysis was performed using Infinicyt® software. RESULTS: The proportion of samples suitable for analysis was higher in FCM compared to cytology (98% vs 61%, p < 0.000). We identified the presence of T lymphocytes and/or monocytes in most samples (98% and 90%, respectively). In the SST samples, the number of events recorded in low-volume samples (< 1 mL) was lower than in samples with higher volume (140 vs 556, p < 0.001), with a median of identification of 3 cell populations. CONCLUSION: FCM allows the analysis of a higher proportion ofpaucicellular CSF samples than cytology in hematologic neoplasms study.
Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Flow Cytometry/methods , Hematologic Neoplasms/cerebrospinal fluid , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Immunophenotyping/methods , Young Adult , Cerebrospinal Fluid/cytology , Cerebrospinal Fluid/chemistry , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Cell CountABSTRACT
Human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC) are adult stem cells located in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. Studies have indicated that hEPC play an important role in the recovery and repair of injured endothelium, however, their quantity and functional capacity is reduced in several diseases including hypercholesterolemia. Recently, it has been demonstrated that hEPC express lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) and its activation by oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) induces cellular dysfunction and apoptosis. This study aimed to investigate whether overexpression of LOXIN, a truncated isoform of LOX-1 that acts as a dominant negative, plays a protective role against ox-LDL-induced apoptosis in hEPC. Human endothelial progenitor cells exposed to ox-LDL showed a significant increase in LOX-1 expression, and apoptosis began at ox-LDL concentrations above 50 µg/mL. All hEPC apoptosed at 200 µg/mL ox-LDL. High LOXIN expression was generated using adenoviral systems in hEPC and SiHa cells transduced with 100 colony-forming units per cell. Transduced LOXIN localized to the plasma membrane and blocked ox-LDL uptake mediated by LOX-1. Overexpression of LOXIN protected hEPC from ox-LDL-induced apoptosis, and therefore maybe a novel way of improving hEPC function and quantity. These results suggest that adenoviral vectors of LOXIN may provide a possible treatment for diseases related to ox-LDL and vascular endothelium dysfunction, including atherosclerosis.
Subject(s)
Apoptosis/genetics , Endothelial Progenitor Cells/cytology , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Scavenger Receptors, Class E/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Endothelium, Vascular/pathology , Humans , Lipoproteins, LDL/administration & dosage , Lipoproteins, LDL/metabolismABSTRACT
Human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC) are recruited to sites of neovascularization where they differentiate into endothelial cells. The signals/factors responsible for hEPC migration and adhesion to sites of injury are not well understood. Elevated levels of adenosine are known to increase mature endothelial cell migration in response to tissue injury. However, the understanding of the role of adenosine in the physiology of hEPC is very limited. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses, we detected the expression of the adenosine receptors A2A, A2B, and A3 in hEPC. Stimulation of adenosine receptors using adenosine or the nonselective agonist adenosine-5'-N-ethylcarboxamide (NECA) increased hEPC migration in 1.4-fold and 2.1-fold (P < 0.01), respectively. Stimulation of hEPC using the A2A-specific agonist CGS-21680 resembled the effect observed in migration when using adenosine or NECA. Consequently, NECA and CGS-21680-stimulated migration of hEPC were reverted using the A2A receptor antagonist ZM-241385. NECA-stimulated migration was inhibited in dose-dependent manner using MRS-1523 (Ki of 147 ± 0.016 nM), MRS-1754 (Ki of 1900 ± 0.02 nM), or ZM-241385 (Ki of 0.2 ± 0.01 nM). In conclusion, adenosine stimulates hEPC migration by activating A2A and A3 but not A2B receptors and provides evidence to support a role of adenosine in modulating angiogenic capacity of hEPC.
