Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0292932, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903088

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although healthcare workers (HCWs) have reported mental health problems since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, they rarely use psychological support. Here, we described the use of psychological support among HCWs in Spain over the 2-year period following the initial pandemic outbreak and explore its association with workplace- and COVID-19-related factors measured at baseline, in 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study on HCWs working in Spain. We used an online survey to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, depressive symptoms, workplace- and COVID-19-related variables, and the use of psychological support at three time points (2020, 2021, and 2022). Data was available for 296, 294, and 251 respondents, respectively at time points 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 43 years and were mostly females (n = 242, 82%). The percentage of HCWs using psychological support increased from 15% in 2020 to 23% in 2022. Roughly one in four HCWs who did not use psychological support reported symptoms compatible with major depressive disorder at follow up. Baseline predictors of psychological support were having to make decisions about patients' prioritisation (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.47, 12.63) and probable depression (wave 2: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; wave 3: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is call for implementing mental health promotion and prevention strategies at the workplace, along with actions to reduce barriers for accessing psychological support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Female , Humans , Adult , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Psychosocial Intervention , Pandemics , Health Personnel
2.
Int J Public Health ; 67: 1604553, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35814735

ABSTRACT

Objective: To characterize the evolution of healthcare workers' mental health status over the 1-year period following the initial COVID-19 pandemic outbreak and to examine baseline characteristics associated with resolution or persistence of mental health problems over time. Methods: We conducted an 8-month follow-up cohort study. Eligible participants were healthcare workers working in Spain. Baseline data were collected during the initial pandemic outbreak. Survey-based self-reported measures included COVID-19-related exposures, sociodemographic characteristics, and three mental health outcomes (psychological distress, depression symptoms, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms). We examined three longitudinal trajectories in mental health outcomes between baseline and follow-up assessments (namely asymptomatic/stable, recovering, and persistently symptomatic/worsening). Results: We recruited 1,807 participants. Between baseline and follow-up assessments, the proportion of respondents screening positive for psychological distress and probable depression decreased, respectively, from 74% to 56% and from 28% to 21%. Two-thirds remained asymptomatic/stable in terms of depression symptoms and 56% remained symptomatic or worsened over time in terms of psychological distress. Conclusion: Poor mental health outcomes among healthcare workers persisted over time. Occupational programs and mental health strategies should be put in place.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Affect Disord ; 295: 405-409, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34507219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the initial COVID-19 outbreak, organizational changes were required to ensure adequate staffing in healthcare facilities. The extent to which organizational changes impacted the mental wellbeing of healthcare workers (HCWs) remains unexplored. Here we analyzed the association between three work-related stressors (reported access to protective equipment, change in job functions, and patient prioritization decision-making) and mental health outcomes (depression symptoms, psychological distress, suicidal thoughts, and fear of infection) in a large sample of Spanish HCWs during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study including HCWs from three regions of Spain between April 24th and June 22nd, 2020. An online survey measured sociodemographic characteristics, work-related stressors, fear of infection, and mental health outcomes (depression [PHQ-9], psychological distress [GHQ-12], death wishes [C-SSRS]). We conducted mixed-effects regression models to adjust all associations for relevant individual- and region-level sources of confounding. RESULTS: We recruited 2,370 HCWs. Twenty-seven percent screened positive for depression and 74% for psychological distress. Seven percent reported death wishes. Respondents were more afraid of infecting their loved ones than of getting infected themselves. All work-related stressors were associated with depression symptoms and psychological distress in adjusted models. LIMITATIONS: Non-probabilistic sampling, potential reverse causation. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable work-related stressors are associated with worse mental health among HCWs. Our results suggest that workplace prevention strategies for HCWs should provide sufficient protective equipment, minimize changes in job functions, favor the implementation of criteria for patient triage and on-call bioethics committees, and facilitate access to stepped-care, evidence-based mental health treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Health Personnel , Humans , Mental Health , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Psiquiatr. salud ment ; 26(3/4): 116-122, jul.-dic. 2009. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-708257

ABSTRACT

Métodos: A partir del año 2007 se efectúan estudios en nuestro Instituto para precisar una dosis adecuada de complejo B a aplicar en el Síndrome de Deprivación Alcohólico (Ibáñez y Bustamante) Resultados: Después de tres semanas de tratamiento con benzodiacepina y complejo B (tiamina) según el nuevo protocolo se logra una recuperación motora y mental de un paciente con un Síndrome Korsakoiwideo alcohólico y un cuadro de paraparesia. Conclusión: Los resultados sugieren que la encefalopatía de Wernicke tratada con dosis superiores a 300 mg/diarios de tiamina puede tener un resultado altamente beneficioso para el paciente con síndrome de deprivación alcohólico.


Method: Since 2007, different studies have been made in our Institute, in order to find the right dose of Vitamin B Complex in cases of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (Ibáñez y Bustamante). Results: After a 3 weeks treatment with Benzodiazepine and Vitamin B Complex (Thiamine), according to the new protocol, a patient with Alcoholic Korsakow Syndrome and Paraparesis, recovers his mental and motor functions. Conclusions: Wernicke’s encephalopathy can be treated with high doses of Thiamine (around 300 mg/a day), on patients with Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome with highly good results.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Alcoholism/complications , Vitamin B Complex/therapeutic use , Wernicke Encephalopathy/drug therapy , Thiamine/therapeutic use , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Vitamin B Complex/administration & dosage , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/complications , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Thiamine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...