Immediate effect of caffeine on sympathetic nerve activity: why coffee is safe? A single-centre crossover study.

PURPOSES: Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response. METHODS: In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations. RESULTS: A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.

Sleep syncope-A systematic review.

Background: Sleep syncope is a subtype of vasovagal syncope in which patients experience syncope after awakening from their sleep. The aim was to investigate the association of clinical characteristics and gastrointestinal symptoms with syncope, as well as the body position in which symptoms began. Methods: A systematic search of studies was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE without language restrictions, from inception to 9 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported data on the proportion of patients who experienced symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea) associated with syncope. Results: Data were included for 116 patients in 13 studies. Patients were 46.9 ± 4.3 years and 61.4% were female. In 52.5% of patients, a supine body position at the time of syncope was reported. A history of phobias was reported by 67.6% of patients, and 96.5% of patients also had typical daytime vasovagal syncope. In the 5 studies reporting the results of head-up tilt testing (n = 77), 90.9% of patients had positive tests. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in the majority of patients with reported rates of 65.6% for upper gastrointestinal symptoms and 86.0% for lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion: Patients with sleep syncope patients are predominantly female with a history of daytime vasovagal syncope. Gastrointestinal symptoms are present in the majority of patients and is therefore an important feature of sleep syncope.

Sleep syncope: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Sleep syncope is defined as a form of vasovagal syncope which interrupts sleep. Long term follow-up has not been reported. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2013 we diagnosed vasovagal syncope in 1105 patients of whom 69 also had sleep syncope. We compared these 69 patients in the sleep syncope group to 118 patients with classical vasovagal syncope consecutively investigated between 1999 and 2003. We compared baseline demography, syncope history, tilt test results and follow-up findings. RESULTS: At baseline, age and gender distribution (mean ± standard deviation) of the classical VVS and sleep synocope groups were similar: 46 ± 21 vs. 47 ± 15 years (p = 0.53), and 55% versus 66% female (p = 0.28), respectively. Abdominal discomfort and vagotonia were more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 80% versus 8% and 33% versus 2% (p < 0.001). Childhood syncope and blood-needle phobia were also more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 58% versus 15% and 69% versus 19% (p < 0.001). Positive tilt test results were similar for the two groups (93% [classical VVS] vs. 91%; p = 0.56). Blood pressure, heart rate and stroke volume changed in a similar manner from baseline to syncope (p = 0.32, 0.34 and 0.18, respectively). Mean duration of follow-up for the classical VVS and sleep syncope groups, as recorded in the electronic records, were 17 (3-21) and 15 (7-27) years, respectively. Rates of mortality and of permanent pacemaker insertion were similar in the two groups: 16.2% (classical VVS) versus 7.6% (p = 0.09) and 3% (classical VVS) versus 3% (p = 0.9). Incidence of sleep episodes decreased from 1.9 ± 3 to 0.1 ± 0.3 episodes per year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sleep syncope is a subtype of vasovagal syncope with characteristic symptoms. Despite the severity of the sleep episodes, the prognosis is very good. Very few patients require permanent pacing, and nearly all respond to education and reassurance.

Pacing in vasovagal syncope: A physiological paradox?

The physiological principles underlying pacemaker treatment in patients with vasovagal syncope have never been reviewed. Current knowledge suggests that pacing the right heart is unlikely to correct blood pressure during a vasovagal reaction. In adults, the reason for this is that stroke volume is dictated by central blood volume contained in the cardiopulmonary vessels within the chest (ie, left ventricular preload). Preceding posture-triggered vasovagal syncope, there is a significant fall in central blood volume and therefore in stroke volume and cardiac output long before the onset of bradycardia. This explains why high rate cardiac pacing does not improve cardiac output or blood pressure during presyncope. Contradictory results between physiological theory and trial evidence underlying pacemaker treatment at present cannot be explained. Placebo effects during pacing for vasovagal syncope should be considered. More work is needed to solve the dilemma.

Different Types of Syncope Presenting to Clinic: Do We Miss Cardiac Syncope?

BACKGROUND: In the outpatient setting, differentiation of cardiac syncope (CS) from other more common forms of syncope is difficult, particularly in the elderly. We examined the frequency of the different types of syncope in a clinic population and estimated missed CS cases. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the relevant data for patients assessed in our Christchurch Hospital syncope clinic over a 5-year study period (1 January 2011-31 December 2015). Patients who were later found to have cardiac syncope (and were not initially diagnosed in our clinic) were counted as "missed" cases. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-nine (839) patients (median age 57, interquartile range: 35-73 years, 56% female) were assessed during the study period. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) was the most frequent diagnosis (42.8%) followed by drug-related postural hypotension (DRPH) (26.6%). Cardiac syncope was initially diagnosed in only 3.1%. Of 30 CS patients initially assessed in syncope clinic who later required pacing, 18 (2.1%) were missed CS. In this group, 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) was normal in 50% and the majority (n=10) were tilt-positive. The 2.5-year mortality was 5.7% (n=48) including three sudden unexpected cardiac deaths. CONCLUSION: Vasovagal syncope and DRPH were by far the most frequent diagnoses. Cardiac syncope was less frequent because patients were selected mainly from an outpatient population, not the emergency department. In a small number of patients, CS was missed for the following reasons: (1) coexistence of cardiac conduction system disease with VVS and DRPH in the elderly, and (2) insensitivity of 12-lead ECG, in-hospital telemetry and out-of-hospital Holter monitoring for detecting conduction system disease early in its development.

Introduction of portable bedside echocardiography to acute general medicine.

We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent portable bedside echocardiography under general medicine over a 15-month period. The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 16-95) (n = 201). Indications for scanning included syncope (27%), murmur (17%) and dyspnoea (14%); findings included valve abnormalities (46%), left ventricular hypertrophy (26%) and dilated left ventricle (15%). Bedside echocardiography is a useful extension of the physical examination but is operator-dependent, and its routine use in general medicine will depend on the availability of training, group reporting sessions and quality assurance.

Adrenomedullin 2 increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in parallel to heart rate in normal conscious sheep.

Both adrenomedullin 2 (AM2) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) have been shown to be involved in regulating cardiovascular activity, but whether any interaction between these two systems exists remains to be determined. In this study, we examine the effects of intravenous AM2 infusions on SNA directed toward the heart (cardiac SNA (CSNA)) in healthy sheep studied in the conscious state. In response to AM2, arterial pressure was reduced (P = 0.005) with both heart rate (P < 0.001) and cardiac output (P < 0.001) increased compared with vehicle control response. CSNA burst frequency (bursts/min) and burst area/min both increased during infusion of AM2 (both P < 0.001). However, correcting CSNA indices for concurrent heart rate changes resulted in CSNA burst incidence (bursts/100 beats) and burst area incidence (area/100 beats) being not significantly different between AM2 and control treatments. There were no significant differences demonstrated in plasma epinephrine or norepinephrine levels between the two study days. In conclusion, AM2 administered systemically to normal conscious sheep increases both CSNA and heart rate. However, correction for heart rate responses abrogates the rise in CSNA. It remains unclear whether AM2's primary effect is to act via the central nervous system to directly stimulate CSNA with resultant increase in heart rate, or to induce a rise in heart rate by other mechanisms.

Sympathetic overactivity in dialysis patients-Underappreciated and clinically consequential.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain frustratingly common in dialysis patients. A dearth of established evidence-based treatment calls for alternative therapeutic avenues to be embraced. Sympathetic hyperactivity, predominantly due to afferent nerve signaling from the diseased native kidneys, has been established to be prognostic in the dialysis population for over 15 years. Despite this, tangible therapeutic interventions have, to date, been unsuccessful and the outlook for patients remains poor. This narrative review summarizes established experimental and clinical data, highlighting recent developments, and proposes why interventions to ameliorate sympathetic hyperactivity may well be beneficial for this high-risk population.

Systemic angiotensin II does not increase cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in normal conscious sheep.

While it is well established that centrally injected angiotensin II (Ang II) has potent actions on sympathetic nervous activity (SNA), it is less clear whether peripheral Ang II can immediately stimulate SNA. In particular, the contribution of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) to the acute pressor response is unknown. We therefore examined the effect of incremental doses of intravenous Ang II (3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 ng/kg/min each for 30 min) on CSNA in eight conscious sheep. Ang II infusions progressively increased plasma Ang II up to 50 pmol/l above control levels in dose-dependent fashion (P<0.001). This was associated with the expected increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) above control levels from <10 mmHg at lower doses up to 23 mmHg at the highest dose (P<0.001). Heart rate and cardiac output fell progressively with each incremental Ang II infusion achieving significance at higher doses (P<0.001). There was no significant change in plasma catecholamines. At no dose did Ang II increase any of the CSNA parameters measured. Rather, CSNA burst frequency (P<0.001), burst incidence, (P=0.002), and burst area (P=0.004) progressively decreased achieving significance during the three highest doses. In conclusion, Ang II infused at physiologically relevant doses increased MAP in association with a reciprocal decrease in CSNA presumably via baroreceptor-mediated pathways. The present study provides no evidence that even low-dose systemic Ang II stimulates sympathetic traffic directed to the heart, in normal conscious sheep.

The pathophysiology of the vasovagal response.

In part I of this study, we found that the classical studies on vasovagal syncope, conducted in fit young subjects, overstated vasodilatation as the dominant hypotensive mechanism. Since 1980, blood pressure and cardiac output have been measured continuously using noninvasive methods during tilt, mainly in patients with recurrent syncope, including women and the elderly. This has allowed us to analyze in more detail the complex sequence of hemodynamic changes leading up to syncope in the laboratory. All tilt-sensitive patients appear to progress through 4 phases: (1) early stabilization, (2) circulatory instability, (3) terminal hypotension, and (4) recovery. The physiology responsible for each phase is discussed. Although the order of phases is consistent, the time spent in each phase may vary. In teenagers and young adults, progressive hypotension during phases 2 and 3 can be driven by vasodilatation or falling cardiac output. The fall in cardiac output is secondary to a progressive decrease in stroke volume because blood is pooled in the splanchnic veins. In adults a fall in cardiac output is the dominant hypotensive mechanism because systemic vascular resistance always remains above baseline levels.

Endovascular Renal Denervation in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Cardiovascular Protection-A Proof-of-Concept Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sympathetic neural activation is markedly increased in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) reduces sympathetic overactivity and blood pressure in resistant hypertension. We investigated the effect of RDN on sympathetic neural activation and left ventricular mass in patients with ESKD. METHODS: Nine ESKD (6 hemodialysis and 3 peritoneal dialysis) patients with dialysis vintage of ≥11 months were treated with RDN (EnligHTN system). Data were obtained on a nondialysis day; at baseline, 1, 3, and 12 months post-RDN. RESULTS: At baseline sympathetic neural activation measured by muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) and plasma norepinephrine concentrations were markedly elevated. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was evident in 8 of the 9 patients. At 12 months post-RDN, blind analysis revealed that MSNAfrequency (-12.2 bursts/min1, 95% CI [-13.6, -10.7]) and LV mass (-27 g/m2, 95% CI [-47, -8]) were reduced. Mean ambulatory BP (systolic: -24 mm Hg, 95% CI [-42, -5] and diastolic: -13 mm Hg, 95% CI [-22, -4]) was also reduced at 12 months. Office BP was reduced as early as 1 month (systolic: -25 mm Hg, 95% CI [-45, -5] and diastolic: -13 mm Hg, 95% CI [-24, -1]). Both ambulatory and office BP had clinically significant reductions in at least 50% of patients out to 12 months. DISCUSSION: Catheter-based RDN significantly reduced MSNA and LV mass as well as systemic BP in this group of patients with ESKD.

Mechanisms of Vasovagal Syncope in the Young: Reduced Systemic Vascular Resistance Versus Reduced Cardiac Output.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a sudden transient loss of consciousness and postural tone caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. The most common form is vasovagal syncope (VVS). Presyncopal progressive early hypotension in older VVS patients is caused by reduced cardiac output (CO); younger patients have reduced systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Using a priori criteria for reduced CO (↓CO) and SVR (↓SVR), we studied 48 recurrent young fainters comparing subgroups of VVS with VVS-↓CO, VVS-↓SVR, and both VVS-↓CO&↓SVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects were studied supine and during 70-degrere upright tilt with a Finometer to continuously measure blood pressure, CO, and SVR and impedance plethysmography to estimate thoracic, splanchnic, pelvic, and calf blood volumes, blood flows, and vascular resistances and electrocardiogram to measure heart rate and rhythm. Central blood volume was decreased in all VVS compared to control. VVS-↓CO was associated with decreased splanchnic blood flow and increased splanchnic blood pooling compared to control. Seventy-five percent of VVS patients had reduced SVR, including 23% who also had reduced CO. Many VVS-↓SVR increased CO during tilt, with no difference in splanchnic pooling, caused by significant increases in splanchnic blood flow and reduced splanchnic resistance. VVS-↓CO&↓SVR patients had splanchnic pooling comparable to VVS-↓CO patients, but SVR comparable to VVS-↓SVR. Splanchnic vasodilation was reduced, compared to VVS-↓SVR, and venomotor properties were similar to control. Combined splanchnic pooling and reduced SVR produced the earliest faints among the VVS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both ↓CO and ↓SVR occur in young VVS patients. ↓SVR is predominant in VVS and is caused by impaired splanchnic vasoconstriction.