Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; : 1-15, 2023 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713535

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Advancements in genetic testing and analysis have allowed improved identification of the genetic basis of childhood apraxia of speech, a rare speech presentation. This study aimed to understand speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') consideration of incorporation of genetics in clinical practice using a theory-informed qualitative approach. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 pediatric SLPs using a behavior change theory (Theoretical Domains Framework [TDF]) within a case study describing a child with complex co-occurring features, including childhood apraxia of speech. Interviews focused on three stages of the patient journey (prereferral, referral, and postreferral). Interviews were analyzed to identify barriers and enablers to considering incorporation of genetics in current clinical practice. Barriers and enablers were grouped and mapped onto a contextually relevant TDF-coded analysis framework. RESULTS: Barriers were identified across several TDF domains, through all stages of the patient journey. Lack of confidence, relevance, and level of experience were most common prereferral, and connection to and awareness of genetics services and contextual factors were barriers in the referral stage. Perception of professional role, knowledge, and beliefs about effects on families were barriers postreferral. Associated enablers were also identified, including seeing value in genetic diagnosis, support from other health care professionals, supervision, and relationships with genetics services. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this qualitative study highlight barriers and enablers to incorporating genetics into speech-language pathology clinical practice. These findings will assist in the development of theory-informed implementation strategies to support SLPs into the future. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24112800.

3.
Am J Med Genet A ; 185(12): 3634-3643, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184819

ABSTRACT

Decisions about genetic testing have traditionally been based on clinical utility and cost, but personal utility is increasingly recognized when assessing the value of testing. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was offered to a population cohort of 106 infants diagnosed with congenital hearing loss. Parents could choose to receive results relating to hearing loss only or also learn additional information about childhood-onset conditions (medically nonactionable and/or actionable). This study aimed to quantify the personal utility of WES for parents after a diagnosis of hearing loss in their child. Parents completed surveys pretest (63/106), after hearing loss results (52/106) and after receiving additional information (47/72). Open-ended responses from all three surveys (N = 67) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Answers to questions regarding the value of sequencing to parents were analyzed and collated. Parents placed high value on diagnostic WES for hearing loss but had different perspectives on the personal utility of additional information. Diagnostic results provided certainty while the choice to learn additional information about childhood-onset disorders was associated with empowerment. WES also represented an opportunity to promote their child's best interests. Results provide insights into the utility of WES for the indication of congenital deafness and for genomic newborn screening broadly.


Subject(s)
Deafness/diagnosis , Genetic Testing , Genomics , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Child , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/genetics , Deafness/pathology , Exome/genetics , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/pathology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Screening , Parents , Surveys and Questionnaires , Exome Sequencing
4.
Am J Med Genet A ; 185(5): 1498-1503, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544979

ABSTRACT

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by CGG expansions of ≥200 repeats (full mutation: FM). Typically, FM causes abnormal methylation of the FMR1 promoter and silencing of FMR1, leading to reduction of FMRP, a protein essential for normal neurodevelopment. However, if unmethylated, these alleles cause over-expression of FMR1 mRNA which has been associated with Fragile X Tremor and Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS), a late onset disorder. This report details the molecular and clinical profile of an asymptomatic male (29 years) identified as a result of cascade testing who was found to have a rare unmethylated FM (UFM) allele, as well as premutation (PM: 55-199 CGG) size alleles in multiple tissues. Full-scale IQ was within the normal range and minimal features of autism were observed. Southern blot analysis identified FM smears in blood (220-380 CGG) and saliva (212-378 CGG). A PM of 159 CGG was identified in blood and saliva. FMR1 promoter methylation analysis showed all alleles to be unmethylated. FMR1 mRNA levels were greater than fivefold of median levels in typically developing controls and males with FXS mosaic for PM and FM alleles. Issues raised during genetic counseling related to risk for FXTAS associated with UFM and elevated FMR1 mRNA levels, as well as, reproductive options, with implications for future practice.


Subject(s)
Ataxia/genetics , Autistic Disorder/genetics , Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein/genetics , Fragile X Syndrome/genetics , Tremor/genetics , Adult , Alleles , Ataxia/pathology , Autistic Disorder/physiopathology , DNA Methylation/genetics , Fragile X Syndrome/pathology , Genetic Carrier Screening , Humans , Male , Mutation/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Tremor/pathology , Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion/genetics , Young Adult
5.
Genet Med ; 23(1): 183-191, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32939031

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease. METHODS: We performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. RESULTS: ES identified a molecular diagnosis in 80 (39%) patients, encompassing 35 distinct genetic disorders. Younger age at presentation was independently associated with an ES diagnosis (p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed, 31/80 (39%) had a change in their clinical diagnosis. ES diagnosis was considered to have contributed to management in 47/80 (59%), including negating the need for diagnostic renal biopsy in 10/80 (13%), changing surveillance in 35/80 (44%), and changing the treatment plan in 16/80 (20%). In cases with no change to management in the proband, the ES result had implications for the management of family members in 26/33 (79%). Cascade testing was subsequently offered to 40/80 families (50%). CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic pediatric and adult cohort with suspected monogenic kidney disease, ES had high diagnostic and clinical utility. Our findings, including predictors of positive diagnosis, can be used to guide clinical practice and health service design.


Subject(s)
Exome , Kidney Diseases , Adult , Australia , Child , Genetic Testing , Humans , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Kidney Diseases/genetics , Exome Sequencing
7.
J Neurol Sci ; 420: 117260, 2021 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310205

ABSTRACT

Currently there is no secured ongoing funding in Australia for next generation sequencing (NGS) such as exome sequencing (ES) for adult neurological disorders. Studies have focused on paediatric populations in research or highly specialised settings, utilised standard NGS pipelines focusing only on small insertions, deletions and single nucleotide variants, and not explored impacts on management in detail. This prospective multi-site study performed ES and an extended bioinformatics repeat expansion analysis pipeline, on patients with broad phenotypes (ataxia, dementia, dystonia, spastic paraparesis, motor neuron disease, Parkinson's disease and complex/not-otherwise-specified), with symptom onset between 2 and 60 years. Genomic data analysis was phenotype-driven, using virtual gene panels, reported according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. One-hundred-and-sixty patients (51% female) were included, median age 52 years (range 14-79) and median 9 years of symptoms. 34/160 (21%) patients received a genetic diagnosis. Highest diagnostic rates were in spastic paraparesis (10/25, 40%), complex/not-otherwise-specified (10/38, 26%) and ataxia (7/28, 25%) groups. Findings were considered 'possible/uncertain' in 21/160 patients. Repeat expansion detection identified an unexpected diagnosis of Huntington disease in an ataxic patient with negative ES. Impacts on management, such as more precise and tailored care, were seen in most diagnosed patients (23/34, 68%). ES and a novel bioinformatics analysis pipepline had a substantial diagnostic yield (21%) and management impacts for most diagnosed patients, in heterogeneous, complex, mainly adult-onset neurological disorders in real-world settings in Australia, providing evidence for NGS and complementary multiple, new technologies as valuable diagnostic tools.


Subject(s)
Exome , Genetic Testing , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia , Child , Computational Biology , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
Genet Med ; 22(12): 1986-1993, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773771

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cost-effectiveness evaluations of first-line genomic sequencing (GS) in the diagnosis of children with genetic conditions are limited by the lack of well-defined comparative cohorts. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early GS in pediatric patients with complex monogenic conditions compared with a matched historical cohort. METHODS: Data, including investigation costs, were collected in a prospective cohort of 92 pediatric patients undergoing singleton GS over an 18-month period (2016-2017) with two of the following: a condition with high mortality, multisystem disease involving three or more organs, or severe limitation of daily function. Comparative data were collected in a matched historical cohort who underwent traditional investigations in the years 2012-2013. RESULTS: GS yielded a diagnosis in 42% while traditional investigations yielded a diagnosis in 23% (p = 0.003). A change in management was experienced by 74% of patients diagnosed following GS, compared with 32% diagnosed following traditional investigations. Singleton GS at a cost of AU$3100 resulted in a mean saving per person of AU$3602 (95% confidence interval [CI] AU$2520-4685). Cost savings occurred across all investigation subtypes and were only minimally offset by clinical management costs. CONCLUSION: GS in complex pediatric patients saves significant costs and doubles the diagnostic yield of traditional approaches.


Subject(s)
Exome , Genomics , Child , Chromosome Mapping , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Prospective Studies
9.
Genet Med ; 22(5): 937-944, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974413

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Genomic newborn screening raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence is required to build a framework to introduce this technology safely and effectively. We investigated the choices made by a diverse group of parents with newborns when offered tiered genomic information from exome sequencing. METHODS: This population-derived cohort comprised infants with congenital deafness. Parents were offered exome sequencing and choice regarding the scope of analysis. Options were choice A, diagnostic analysis only; choice B, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with medical actionability; or choice C, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with or without medical actionability. RESULTS: Of the 106 participants, 72 (68%) consented to receive additional findings with 29 (27.4%) selecting choice B and 43 (40.6%) opting for choice C. Family size, ethnicity, and age of infant at time of recruitment were the significant predictors of choice. Parents who opted to have additional findings analysis demonstrated less anxiety and decisional conflict. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence from a culturally diverse population that choice around additional findings is important and the age of the infant when this choice is offered impacts on their decision. We found no evidence that offering different levels of genomic information to parents of newborns has a negative psychological impact.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Neonatal Screening , Child , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/genetics , Exome/genetics , Genetic Testing , Genomics , Hearing , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
10.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 28(5): 587-596, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31827275

ABSTRACT

Congenital hearing impairment (HI) is the most common sensory impairment and can be isolated or part of a syndrome. Diagnosis through newborn hearing screening and management through early intervention, hearing aids and cochlear implantation is well established in the Australian setting; however understanding the genetic basis of congenital HI has been missing. This population-derived cohort comprised infants with moderate-profound bilateral HI born in the 2016-2017 calendar years, detected through newborn hearing screening. Participants were recruited through an integrated paediatric, otolaryngology and genetics HI clinic and offered whole exome sequencing (WES) on a HiSeq4000 or NextSeq500 (Illumina) platform with a targeted average sequencing depth of 100x and chromosome microarray on the Illumina Infinium core exome-24v1.2 platform. Of those approached, 68% (106/156) consented to participate. The rate of genetic diagnosis was 56% (59/106), significantly higher than standard of care (GJB2/6 sequencing only), 21% (22/106). There were clinical implications for the 106 participants: 36% required no further screening, 9% had tailored screening initiated, 2% were offered treatment and 4% had informed care for a complex neurodevelopmental syndrome. WES in this cohort demonstrates the range of diagnoses associated with congenital HI and confirms the genetic heterogeneity of congenital HI. The high diagnostic yield and clinical implications emphasises the need for genomic sequencing to become standard of care.


Subject(s)
Exome Sequencing/standards , Genetic Testing/standards , Hearing Loss/genetics , Neonatal Screening/standards , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Screening/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Exome Sequencing/methods
11.
J Genet Couns ; 28(2): 388-397, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30776170

ABSTRACT

Internationally, the practice of offering additional findings (AFs) when undertaking a clinically indicated genomic test differs. In the USA, the recommendation is to include analysis for AFs alongside diagnostic analysis, unless a patient opts-out, whereas European and Canadian guidelines recommend opt-in models. These guidelines all consider the offer of AFs as an activity concurrent with the offer of diagnostic testing. This paper describes a novel two-step model for managing AFs within the healthcare system in Victoria, Australia and presents the study protocol for its evaluation. Adults who have received results of diagnostic whole exome sequencing undertaken within the healthcare system are invited to attend a genetic counseling appointment to consider reanalysis of their stored genomic data for AFs. The evaluation protocol addresses uptake, decision-making, understanding, counseling challenges, and explores preferences for future models of care. Recruitment commenced in November 2017 and will cease when 200 participants have been approached. When the study is concluded, the evaluation results will contribute to the evidence base guiding approaches to counseling and models of care for AFs.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling/methods , Genomics , Adult , Canada , Decision Making , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Victoria
12.
Genet Med ; 20(12): 1554-1563, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543227

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to implement and prospectively evaluate the outcomes of a rapid genomic diagnosis program at two pediatric tertiary centers. METHODS: Rapid singleton whole-exome sequencing (rWES) was performed in acutely unwell pediatric patients with suspected monogenic disorders. Laboratory and clinical barriers to implementation were addressed through continuous multidisciplinary review of process parameters. Diagnostic and clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of rWES were assessed. RESULTS: Of 40 enrolled patients, 21 (52.5%) received a diagnosis, with median time to report of 16 days (range 9-109 days). A result was provided during the first hospital admission in 28 of 36 inpatients (78%). Clinical management changed in 12 of the 21 diagnosed patients (57%), including the provision of lifesaving treatment, avoidance of invasive biopsies, and palliative care guidance. The cost per diagnosis was AU$13,388 (US$10,453). Additional cost savings from avoidance of planned tests and procedures and reduced length of stay are estimated to be around AU$543,178 (US$424,101). The clear relative advantage of rWES, joint clinical and laboratory leadership, and the creation of a multidisciplinary "rapid team" were key to successful implementation. CONCLUSION: Rapid genomic testing in acute pediatrics is not only feasible but also cost-effective, and has high diagnostic and clinical utility. It requires a whole-of-system approach for successful implementation.


Subject(s)
Exome Sequencing/trends , Genetic Testing/trends , Pathology, Molecular/trends , Pediatrics/trends , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exome/genetics , Female , Genetic Testing/economics , Genome, Human/genetics , Genomics , Humans , Male , Pathology, Molecular/economics , Pediatrics/economics , Exome Sequencing/economics
13.
J Genet Couns ; 27(5): 1010-1021, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29368275

ABSTRACT

As genomic sequencing becomes more widely available in clinical settings for diagnostic purposes, a number of genetic counseling issues are gaining precedence. The ability to manage these issues will be paramount as genetic and non-genetic healthcare professionals navigate the complexities of using genomic technologies to facilitate diagnosis and inform patient management. Counseling issues arising when counseling for diagnostic genomic sequencing were identified by four genetic counselors with 10 years of collective experience providing genetic counseling in this setting. These issues were discussed and refined at a meeting of genetic counselors working in clinical genomics settings in Melbourne, Australia. Emerging counseling issues, or variations of established counseling issues, were identified from the issues raised. Illustrative cases were selected where pre- and post-test genetic counseling was provided in clinical settings to individuals who received singleton or trio WES with targeted analysis. Counseling issues discussed in this paper include a reappraisal of how genetic counselors manage hope in the genomic era, informed consent for secondary use of genomic data, clinical reanalysis of genomic data, unexpected or unsolicited secondary findings, and trio sequencing. The authors seek to contribute to the evolving understanding of genetic counseling for diagnostic genomic sequencing through considering the applicability of existing genetic counseling competencies to managing emerging counseling issues and discussing genetic counseling practice implications.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling/psychology , Genomics , Australia , Humans
14.
JAMA Pediatr ; 171(9): 855-862, 2017 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28759686

ABSTRACT

Importance: Optimal use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in the pediatric setting requires an understanding of who should be considered for testing and when it should be performed to maximize clinical utility and cost-effectiveness. Objectives: To investigate the impact of WES in sequencing-naive children suspected of having a monogenic disorder and evaluate its cost-effectiveness if WES had been available at different time points in their diagnostic trajectory. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective study was part of the Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance demonstration project. At the ambulatory outpatient clinics of the Victorian Clinical Genetics Services at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, children older than 2 years suspected of having a monogenic disorder were prospectively recruited from May 1 through November 30, 2015, by clinical geneticists after referral from general and subspecialist pediatricians. All children had nondiagnostic microarrays and no prior single-gene or panel sequencing. Exposures: All children underwent singleton WES with targeted phenotype-driven analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study examined the clinical utility of a molecular diagnosis and the cost-effectiveness of alternative diagnostic trajectories, depending on timing of WES. Results: Of 61 children originally assessed, 44 (21 [48%] male and 23 [52%] female) aged 2 to 18 years (mean age at initial presentation, 28 months; range, 0-121 months) were recruited, and a diagnosis was achieved in 23 (52%) by singleton WES. The diagnoses were unexpected in 8 of 23 (35%), and clinical management was altered in 6 of 23 (26%). The mean duration of the diagnostic odyssey was 6 years, with each child having a mean of 19 tests and 4 clinical genetics and 4 nongenetics specialist consultations, and 26 (59%) underwent a procedure while under general anesthetic for diagnostic purposes. Economic analyses of the diagnostic trajectory identified that WES performed at initial tertiary presentation resulted in an incremental cost savings of A$9020 (US$6838) per additional diagnosis (95% CI, A$4304-A$15 404 [US$3263-US$11 678]) compared with the standard diagnostic pathway. Even if WES were performed at the first genetics appointment, there would be an incremental cost savings of A$5461 (US$4140) (95% CI, A$1433-A$10 557 [US$1086- US$8004]) per additional diagnosis compared with the standard diagnostic pathway. Conclusions and Relevance: Singleton WES in children with suspected monogenic conditions has high diagnostic yield, and cost-effectiveness is maximized by early application in the diagnostic pathway. Pediatricians should consider early referral of children with undiagnosed syndromes to clinical geneticists.


Subject(s)
Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Australia , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exome/genetics , Female , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/economics , Humans , Male , Mutation , Prospective Studies , Sequence Analysis, DNA/economics
15.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 30(3): 299-306, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25147204

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the patterns of inheritance and gene mutation status in early-onset dementia (EOD). METHODS: Data were collected on 202 consecutive patients presenting to an EOD clinic. Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD, n = 120) and early-onset frontotemporal dementia (EOFTD, n = 82) were studied. RESULTS: The majority of participants, 72.5% with EOAD and 74.4% with EOFTD, did not have a positive family history of dementia. An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance was observed in 14.2% of patients with EOAD and 13.4% of patients with FTD. Of those with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, 11.8% of EOAD and 45.5% of FTD probands had known pathogenic mutations. Only 1.6% of the total population of EOAD and 7.3% of EOFTD possessed known gene mutations. CONCLUSION: Early-onset dementia does not appear to be a strongly inherited autosomal dominant condition. The majority of patients were sporadic. Known mutations were uncommon and do not explain the total autosomal dominant burden.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Frontotemporal Dementia/genetics , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
16.
Am J Neurodegener Dis ; 3(3): 143-51, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25628965

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Biomarkers represent a promising adjunct to clinical techniques in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases. At present, the potential of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in diagnosing AD has been suggested but the degree of clinical utility is yet to be defined due to variability between studies. In this paper we compare the performance of two cerebrospinal fluid assay methods in predicting clinically diagnosed AD. METHODS: CSF biomarker concentrations for Aß1-42, P-tau181P and T-tau were analysed using INNOTEST (ELISA) and INNO-BIA AlzBio3 (Luminex) assay methods from Innogenetics, Belgium. Patients were clinically diagnosed based on NINCDS-ADRDA criteria supplemented with structural MRI, (18)F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cognitive profiling. RESULTS: An abnormally low Aß1-42 was the most useful biomarker in predicting clinical AD. Depending on the assay method, the predictive accuracy remained constant or improved slightly when abnormalities in P-tau181P and T-tau were considered in addition to Aß1-42. The Luminex method with our optimised reference concentrations performed best for patients ≤ 65 years with sensitivity = 1 and a specificity = 0.60 for both Aß1-42 and when one or more abnormal biomarkers were considered. CONCLUSION: Given accurate, robust and reproducible CSF analytical methods, of which the Luminex method seems the most useful and practicable, our investigation suggests that measuring CSF Aß1-42, P-tau and T-tau has utility in the diagnosis of probable AD and, when used with clinical diagnostic techniques, seems especially helpful in the diagnosis of AD with onset prior to the age of 65 years.

17.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 28(1): 42-6, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23220922

ABSTRACT

AIM: The burden of early-onset dementia (EOD) is often overshadowed by an ageing population. METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 12 items was completed by 18 patients with EOD (15 with Alzheimer's disease [AD] and 3 with frontotemporal dementia) and 39 caregivers (20 spouses, 8 children, 7 siblings, 2 carers, and 2 health professionals). The onset of patients' symptoms was prior to the age of 65 years. Caregivers had to be supporting someone who matched these criteria. RESULTS: Early recognition and referral was perceived as the principle area of improvement by both patients (94.4%) and carers (69.2%; P < .0002). Patients evaluated "diagnosis" as the area of most need (88.9%) compared with caregivers who rated "treatment" (69.2%) as their principle concern. CONCLUSION: The perceived concerns of patients with EOD differ from that of the caregivers. Continued consumer involvement is essential in ensuring a tailored approach to young people with dementia.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Frontotemporal Dementia/diagnosis , Frontotemporal Dementia/psychology , Health Services Needs and Demand/standards , Age of Onset , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Australia/epidemiology , Community Participation/psychology , Early Diagnosis , Female , Frontotemporal Dementia/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...