Chemotherapy extravasation injuries beyond the immediate stage: A series of 15 cases treated according to a preset surgical algorithm based on time of presentation.

Chemotherapy extravasation can cause severe harm. There is a lack of evidence-based standardization on the surgical management of such injuries beyond the immediate stage. In an algorithm connecting presentation time post-injury with surgical treatment could help standardize future treatment. This study prospectively validated a preset standardized surgical algorithm based on presentation time in a consecutive series between October 2017 and October 2020. Chemotherapeutic agent, site and extent of injury, type of surgery and outcome at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up were collected. Seven thousand six hundred twelve individuals received chemotherapy during that period; 15 patients suffered extravasation injuries, 2 of whom were referred from outside our hospital. This algorithm distinguished: A) beyond the immediate stage and up to 2 days, treated with saline subcutaneous washout (SCWO) and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing; B) 2 to 5 days, open surgical decompression and VAC dressing; C) 5 to 10 days, non-operative management with surveillance; and D) more than 10 days, radical necrotic excision with or without VAC dressing and tissue reconstruction. In 2 patients in Group A and 3 patients in Group B, all vesicant symptoms resolved. Five of the 6 patients in Group C (3 vesicant, 3 non-vesicant) did not progress into necrosis or infection, and 1 case of vesicant extravasation progressed to a localized ulcer beyond this period and, as surgery was refused, led to a chronic ulcer with stiffness; 2 cases of non-vesicant extravasation developed a recall phenomenon but resolved after the third cycle. Of the 4 patients in Group D, all vesicant, 2 were treated with no complications, 1 had complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) due to late presentation, and 1, referred with necrotizing fasciitis, underwent above-elbow amputation but died due to septic shock. This study demonstrated a uniform surgical approach in a series of 15 cases; larger studies are still needed to validate the efficacy of this protocol in reducing morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The carrying angle: racial differences and relevance to inter-epicondylar distance of the humerus.

The human carrying angle (CA) is a measure of the lateral deflection of the forearm from the arm. The importance of this angle emerges from its functional and clinical relevance. Previous studies have correlated this angle with different parameters including age, gender, and handedness. However, no reports have focused on race-dependent variations in CA or its relation to various components of the elbow joint. This study aimed to investigate the variations in CA with respect to race and inter-epicondylar distance (IED) of the humerus. The study included 457 Jordanian and 345 Malaysian volunteers with an age range of 18-21 years. All participants were right-hand dominant with no previous medical history in their upper limbs. Both CA and IED were measured by well-trained medical practitioners according to a well-established protocol. Regardless of race, CA was greater on the dominant side and in females. Furthermore, CA was significantly greater in Malaysian males compared to Jordanian males, and significantly smaller in Malaysian females compared to their Jordanian counterparts. Finally, CA significantly decreased with increasing IED in both races. This study supports effects of gender and handedness on the CA independent of race. However, CA also varies with race, and this variation is independent of age, gender, and handedness. The evaluation also revealed an inverse relationship between CA and IED. These findings indicate that multiple factors including race and IED should be considered during the examination and management of elbow fractures and epicondylar diseases.

Acute abscess with fistula: long-term results justify drainage and fistulotomy.

Conventional treatment of anal abscess by a simple drainage continues to be routine in many centers despite retrospective and randomized data showing that primary fistulotomy at the time of abscess drainage is safe and efficient. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term results of fistulotomy in the treatment of anal abscesses. This is a prospective nonrandomized study of 165 consecutive patients treated for anal abscess in University Hospital Hassan II, Fez, Morocco, between January 2005 and December 2010. Altogether 102 patients were eligible to be included in the study. Among them, 52 were treated by a simple drainage and 50 by drainage with fistulotomy. The results were analyzed in terms of recurrence and incontinence after a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range 2-6 years). The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender distribution, type and size of abscess. The recurrence rate after surgery was significantly higher in the group treated by drainage alone (88 %) compared to other group treated by drainage and fistulotomy (4, 8 %) (p < 0.0001). However, there was a tendency to a higher risk of fecal incontinence in the fistulotomy group (5 % vs 1 %), although this difference was not significant (p = 0.27). In the group treated by drainage and fistulotomy, high fistula tract patients are more prone to develop incontinence and recurrence, mainly within the first year. A long-term follow-up seems not to influence the results of fistulotomy group. These findings confirm that fistulotomy is an efficient and safe treatment of anal abscess with good long-term results. An exception is a high fistula, where fistulotomy may be associated with a risk of recurrence and incontinence.

Methodological challenges in evaluating performance, impact and ranking of IWRM strategies in the Jordan Valley.

The philosophy of integrated water resource management (IWRM), as formulated in several international summits, yielded numerous interpretations and extensions over the last decade but always focused on the overall objective of maximizing the welfare and livelihood of the people concerned. One of the major constraints of this concept is the gap between the well-defined philosophy and the fuzzy definition of operational and testable indicators for the achievement of its goals. This leads to difficulties in the evaluation of potential contributions from technological and managerial improvements. The experience of the multi-lateral IWRM research initiative SMART in the lower Jordan Valley shows that the evaluation and ranking of alternative IWRM strategies and their elements relies simultaneously on the identification of local goals and their interfaces with the superordinate national water sector policies. The documentation of the, still ongoing, development process of suitable assessment procedures describes their methodological embedding and conclusions drawn for the heterogeneous situation of water-related settings in this transboundary watershed.