ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim is to evaluate laparoscopic cholecystectomy safety based on American Society of Anesthesiologists score for acute cholecystitis in patients with comorbidities. Patients & methods: This is retrospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2003 and 2021. According to their respective ASA-score, patients were divided into group 1: ASA1-2 and group 2: ASA3-4. Results: We collected 578 patients. Even though the gangrenous forms were more frequent and the operative time was longer in group 2, laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems safe and effective. We didn't observe any differences in terms of intraoperative incidents, open conversion rate, or postoperative complications compared with other patients. Conclusion: ASA3-4 patients with acute cholecystitis don't face elevated risks of complications or mortality during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This study, involving 578 patients with acute cholecystitis, assessed the safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on their health scores. Despite longer operative times and more gangrenous forms in higher-scored patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be safe and effective. No significant differences in complications or mortality were observed compared with lower-scored patients. In conclusion, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered a safe option for patients with higher health scores facing acute cholecystitis.
Study assessed laparoscopic cholecystectomy safety in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis based on ASA scores. Despite longer operative times, it's a safe and effective option. #CholecystectomySafety.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, biliary-enteric drainage (BED) is regarded as a last resort or obsolete therapeutic method for common bile duct stone (CBDS) not only because of advances in minimally invasive therapeutic modalities but also due to fears of higher morbidity, cholangitis, and "sump" syndrome. AIM: The present study aimed at evaluating the outcome of this procedure for choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective review of 51 patients who underwent open choledochoenterostomy for CBDS between January 2005 and December 2009. RESULTS: About 40 women (78%) and 11 men underwent open BED (mean age 72 years). Indications were elderly patients (90%), multiple stones (54.9%) and unextractable calculi (15.4%). We performed 49 (96%) side to side choledochoduodenostomies, one end to side choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and one end to side hepaticojejunostomy. The mortality rate was 3.9%. Overall morbidity was 12% with no biliary leakage. With a decline of 1-6 years, neither sump syndrome nor cholangiocarcinoma occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Side-to-side CDS is a safe and highly effective therapeutic measure, even when performed on ducts less than 15 mm wide, provided a few technical requirements are respected. Patients experiencing relapsing cholangitis after BED should be closely monitored for the late development of biliary tract malignancies.
