Care of the central venous catheterization site: the use of a transparent polyurethane film.

Studies of care of patients with central venous catheters report a 3-7% incidence of catheter-induced sepsis when sterile gauze and tape are used as an occlusive dressing. The technique requires that the dressing be changed three times each week for catheterization site inspection. From June 1979 to September 1980, a noncomparative evaluation of a transparent, self-adhesive, polyurethane dressing which is permeable to water vapor but not bacteria was performed. This dressing was used for the care of 100 consecutive patients with central venous catheters. Dressing life averaged 5.3 days with silicone rubber catheters and 4.3 days for polyvinyl chloride catheters. One patient developed catheter induced sepsis (incidence 1%). This dressing material: (1) is acceptable for use as a dressing of central venous catheters; (2) continuously permits inspection of the insertion sites; (3) decreases nursing hours; (4) provides a comfortable dressing which secures the catheter to the patient; and (5) is durable even when exposed to high humidity therapy devices, or when possible permits the patient to take showers.

Daily dressing change effects on skin flora beneath subclavian catheter dressings during total parenteral nutrition.

Septicemia is a persistent problem during total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The skin around the catheter insertion site is one possible source of this infection. In previous studies we showed mechanical cleansing of the skin was more important than the ointment applied; however, alternate day dressing changes did not completely eradicate all skin organisms. The present study was designated to examine the effects of daily dressing changes on the skin flora beneath the subclavian dressing. Fifteen patients receiving TPN were studied for a minimum of 11 days each. The dressing was changed daily and the catheter site cultured immediately. The area was then scrubbed with polyvinylpovidine-iodine, an antibiotic ointment was placed on the catheter insertion site, and a new dressing applied. There were no positive skin or blood cultures in this group during a total study period of 242 patient-days. The control group consisted of 23 patients receiving identical subclavian catheter care but on an alternative rather than daily basis. In the control group there was a 3.5% incidence of positive skin cultures in 530 patient-days. Daily dressing changes eliminated all skin organisms beneath the subclavian dressing during TPN and would be useful in patients who are at high risk for septic complications.