ABSTRACT
Background and objectives Medical residents may work from home for various reasons, including study electives, isolation due to exposure to illness, or during parental leave when they choose to work at home instead of taking extended time off. The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Little Rock Family Medicine residency program recognized the need for a tool that provided residents with a list of resources and approved activities for at-home work and a means of tracking their performance in those activities. Methods The administration team at the UAMS Little Rock Family Medicine residency program custom-designed a Daily Activities Log that served multiple purposes. Family medicine residents used it to choose what activities to participate in from a comprehensive list of activities and resources including virtual conferences, recorded didactics, modules, and other online materials. The program provided the framework on the log, while residents used it to document time spent on those activities. The log also gave the program a daily update on the resident's health, as one question specifically asked about well-being. Since it was built in an electronic survey format already owned by the residency program, it was completely customizable and available at no additional cost. Results In the two years covered by this project, residents logged a total of 593 hours of at-home work. In response to a survey, 76% of participating residents (N=14) rated the log as extremely or very easy to use; 64% indicated that it was a helpful resource; and 50% said that it simplified the reporting of their daily status. The residency program faculty found that having one source to track all off-site residents was an efficient means of monitoring their well-being and their work. Conclusions The Daily Activities Log is a versatile tool that provides comprehensive information, resources, and approved activities for residents, documents their work, and provides updates to residency management. It can be readily modified for use in other programs that have residents working at home.
ABSTRACT
Objective The aim of this research was to determine if medical students' use of the active study strategy of working practice questions is associated with improved performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam when compared to students who used the passive study strategy of watching educational videos. Methods The study used a correlational design. Participants were students from two cohorts in a United States medical school (N=164 and N=163) who completed their first two years and took the USMLE Step 1 exam. Data collected retrospectively included the number of practice questions completed, educational videos watched, Step 1 exam scores, average scores on in-class exams, and scores on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). Results The number of videos watched was negatively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r= -0.294, α=0.01) and cohort 2023 (r= -0.175, α=0.05). The number of practice questions worked was positively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r=0.176, α=0.05) and cohort 2023 (r=0.143 though not significant). The number of practice questions was a significant positive predictor of Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (ß=0.141, p=0.017) and cohort 2023 (ß=0.133, p=0.015). Videos were significant negative predictors for cohort 2023 (ß= -0.118, p=0.034). Conclusions Answering practice questions appears to be a more effective study method than passively watching videos. Though other studies have supported the use of active learning methods, this study is unique in finding a negative correlation between test scores and the number of educational videos watched. Medical students should be urged to make the most effective use of study time by incorporating working practice questions and limiting watching educational videos.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: In order to emphasize the role family medicine plays in providing robust primary care in functioning health care systems, we piloted a novel online curriculum for third-year medical students. Using a digital documentary and published articles as prompts, this flipped-classroom, discussion-based Philosophies of Family Medicine curriculum (POFM) highlighted concepts that have either emerged from or been embraced by family medicine (FM) over the past 5 decades. These concepts include the biopsychosocial model, the therapeutic importance of the doctor-patient relationship, and the unique nature of FM. The purpose of this mixed-methods pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of the curriculum and assist in its further development. Methods: The intervention-POFM-consisted of five 1-hour, online discussion sessions with 12 small groups of students (N=64), distributed across seven clinical sites, during their month-long family medicine clerkship block rotations. Each session focused on one theme fundamental to the practice of FM. We collected qualitative data through verbal assessments elicited at the end of each session and written assessments at the end of the entire clerkship. We collected supplementary quantitative data via electronically distributed anonymous pre- and postintervention surveys. Results: The study qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrated that POFM helped students understand philosophies fundamental to the practice of FM, improved their attitudes toward FM, and aided in their appreciation of FM as an essential element of a functioning health care system. Conclusion: The results of this pilot study show effective integration of POFM into our FM clerkship. As POFM matures, we plan to expand its curricular role, further evaluate its influence, and use it to increase the academic footing of FM at our institution.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Untreated maternal depression negatively impacts both the mother and her children's health and development. We sought to assess family medicine program directors' (PDs) knowledge and attitudes regarding maternal depression management as well as resident training and clinical experience with this disorder. METHODS: Data were gathered through the Council of Academic Family Medicine's (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance (CERA) national survey of family medicine PDs in US and Canadian programs, from January through February, 2018. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 298 PDs (57.1% response rate) who were majority male (58.9%) and white (83.8%). Nearly all (90.2%) PDs agreed that family physicians should lead efforts to minimize the impact of maternal depression on child well-being. According to PD report, in the family medicine clinics where residents train, most (77.3%) have a clinic process that ensures that routine screening for depression occurs, and 54.4% do some screening of mothers during pediatric visits. Only 18.2% report routinely taking steps to minimize the impact of the mothers' depression on child well-being. Finally, 41.3% of PDs reported being familiar with the literature on the impact of maternal depression on children; self-reported familiarity was significantly associated with more comprehensive resident training on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine residency program directors are supportive of training in maternal depression, though their current knowledge is variable and there are opportunities to enhance care of mothers and children impacted by this common and serious disorder.
