ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the results of one-muscle surgery in 15-25 prism diopters (PD) horizontal comitant strabismus in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15-25 PD horizontal strabismus patients, comprising 25 exotropic (XT) patients and 11 esotropic (ET) patients, who underwent one-muscle recession by a single surgeon with a fixed surgical dosage were included in the study with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. The main outcome was a surgical success, which is defined as a residual deviation of <8 PD at the last examination. Other parameters include postoperative lateral incomitance and patient satisfaction. Postoperative lateral incomitance indicated a difference in deviation of >5 PD between the primary position and lateral gaze, or duction limitation at any visit. Patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic and functional outcomes was assessed by using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Successful alignment was obtained in 19 (76%) and 9 (81.81%) XT and ET patients (p = 1.00), with a median and interquartile range (IQR) of follow-up time of 3, 3-3 months and 3, 3-7 months, respectively. Postoperative lateral incomitance was observed in 8 (32%) XT patients and in 1 (9.09%) ET patient (p = 0.22). One XT patient and one ET patient who developed incomitance reported diplopia, which disappeared 3 months after surgery. One XT patient reported diplopia while gazing towards the operated eye whilst one ET patient reported diplopia occasionally which was unrelated to gaze direction. Patient satisfaction was based on Likert scale scores with 4.12 ± 0.97 in XT patients and 4.73 ± 0.65 in ET patients (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: One-muscle recession with a fixed surgical dosage was effective for treating small angle horizontal strabismus with a high rate of surgical success and patient satisfaction. Although postoperative lateral incomitance occurred, only a few patients developed symptomatic diplopia, which completely resolved 3 months after surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the regional movement toward ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), medical professions including physicians can be qualified to practice medicine in another country. Ensuring comparable, excellent medical qualification systems is crucial but the availability and analysis of relevant information has been lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study had the following aims: 1) to comparatively analyze information on Medical Licensing Examinations (MLE) across ASEAN countries and 2) to assess stakeholders' view on potential consequences of AEC on the medical profession from a Thai perspective. DESIGN: To search for relevant information on MLE, we started with each country's national body as the primary data source. In case of lack of available data, secondary data sources including official websites of medical universities, colleagues in international and national medical student organizations, and some other appropriate Internet sources were used. Feasibility and concerns about validity and reliability of these sources were discussed among investigators. Experts in the region invited through HealthSpace.Asia conducted the final data validation. For the second objective, in-depth interviews were conducted with 13 Thai stakeholders, purposely selected based on a maximum variation sampling technique to represent the points of view of the medical licensing authority, the medical profession, ethicists and economists. RESULTS: MLE systems exist in all ASEAN countries except Brunei, but vary greatly. Although the majority has a national MLE system, Singapore, Indonesia, and Vietnam accept results of MLE conducted at universities. Thailand adopted the USA's 3-step approach that aims to check pre-clinical knowledge, clinical knowledge, and clinical skills. Most countries, however, require only one step. A multiple choice question (MCQ) is the most commonly used method of assessment; a modified essay question (MEQ) is the next most common. Although both tests assess candidate's knowledge, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is used to verify clinical skills of the examinee. The validity of the medical license and that it reflects a consistent and high standard of medical knowledge is a sensitive issue because of potentially unfair movement of physicians and an embedded sense of domination, at least from a Thai perspective. CONCLUSIONS: MLE systems differ across ASEAN countries in some important aspects that might be of concern from a fairness viewpoint and therefore should be addressed in the movement toward AEC.
