Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 125(1-4): 194-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17132655

ABSTRACT

IMBA (Integrated Modules for Bioassay Analysis) is a suite of software modules that implement the current ICRP biokinetic and dosimetric models for estimation of intakes and doses. The IMBA modules have gone through extensive quality assurance, and are now used for routine formal dose assessment by Approved Dosimetry Services throughout the UK. HPA has continued to develop the IMBA modules. In addition, several projects, sponsored by organisations both in the USA and in Canada, have resulted in the development of customised user-friendly interfaces (IMBA Expert 'editions'). These enable users not only to use the standard ICRP models, but also to change many of the parameter values from ICRP defaults, and to apply sophisticated data handling techniques to internal dose calculations. These include: fitting measurement data with the maximum likelihood method; using multiple chronic and acute intakes; and dealing with different data types, such as urine, faces and whole body simultaneously. These interfaces were improved further as a result of user-feedback, and a general 'off-the-shelf' product, IMBA Professional, was developed and made available in January 2004. A new version, IMBA Professional Plus, was released in April 2005, which is both faster and more powerful than previous software. The aim of this paper is to describe the capabilities of IMBA Professional Plus, and the mathematical methods used.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Models, Biological , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Software , User-Computer Interface , Algorithms , Body Burden , Computer Simulation , Humans , Internationality , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software Design
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 105(1-4): 421-5, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14527001

ABSTRACT

In 1997, a collaboration between British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL), Westlakes Research Institute and NRPB started, with the aim of producing IMBA (Integrated Modules for Bioassay Analysis), a suite of software modules that implement the new ICRP models for estimation of intakes and doses. This was partly in response to new UK regulations, and partly due to the requirement for a unified approach in estimating intakes and doses from bioassay measurements within the UK. Over the past 5 years, the IMBA modules have been developed further, have gone through extensive quality assurance, and are now used for routine dose assessment by approved dosimetry services throughout the UK. More recently, interest in the IMBA methodology has been shown by the United States Department of Energy (USDOE), and in 2001 an ambitious project to develop a software package (IMBA Expert USDOE Edition) which would meet the requirements of all of the major USDOE sites began. Interest in IMBA Expert is now being expressed in many other countries. The aim of this paper is to outline the origin and evolution of the IMBA modules (the past); to describe the full capabilities of the current IMBA Expert system (the present) and to indicate possible future directions in terms of capabilities and availability (the future).


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Models, Statistical , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioisotopes/analysis , Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Radiometry/methods , Software , Computer Simulation , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/standards , Software Design , United Kingdom
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 104(3): 221-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14565728

ABSTRACT

A laboratory intercomparison for internal dose assessment from a variety of intake scenarios is described. This is the first UK intercomparison using the revised ICRP Human Respiratory Tract and biokinetic models. Four United Kingdom laboratories participated and six cases were assessed. Overall, the agreement in internal dose assessments between laboratories was considered satisfactory with 79% of the assessed committed effective doses, e(50), for cases within a band of +/- 40% of the median value. The range (highest/lowest) in e(50) estimated by the laboratories was smallest (1.2) for a case involving inhalation of 137Cs. The range was greatest (6.0) for a case involving a wound with, and possible inhalation of, 238Pu, 239Pu and 241Am; the variation between laboratories in assessment of intakes could not be considered to be satisfactory in this case. Judgements on the most appropriate data to use in estimating intakes, choice of parameter values for use with the ICRP models and allowing for the effects of treatment with DTPA were important sources of variability between laboratories.


Subject(s)
Observer Variation , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radioisotopes/analysis , Radiometry/methods , Safety Management/methods , Safety Management/standards , Body Burden , Health Physics/instrumentation , Health Physics/methods , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/standards , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...