Bleeding risk of antiplatelet drugs compared with oral anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Essentials Hemorrhagic risk of antiplatelet drugs is generally thought to be lower than anticoagulants. We systematically reviewed trials comparing antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in older patients. Overall, the risk of major bleeding was similar with antiplatelet and with anticoagulant drugs. In elderly patients, risks and benefits of antiplatelet drugs should be carefully weighted. SUMMARY: Background The hemorrhagic risk of antiplatelet drugs in older patients could be higher than is usually assumed. Objective To compare the bleeding risk of antiplatelet drugs and oral anticoagulants in elderly patients. Methods We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to January 2016 for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and parallel cohorts comparing antiplatelet drugs and oral anticoagulants in patients aged 65 years or older. Two independent authors assessed studies for inclusion. The pooled relative risk (RR) of major bleeding was estimated using a random model. Results Seven RCTs (4550 patients) and four cohort studies (38 649 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The risk of major bleeding when on aspirin or clopidogrel was equal to that when on warfarin in RCTs (RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.69-1.48; moderate-quality evidence), lower than when on warfarin in non-randomized cohort studies (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; low-quality evidence) and not different when all studies were combined (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01). Bleeding of any severity (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86) and intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73) were less frequent with antiplatelet drugs than with warfarin. All-cause mortality was similar (RR, 0.99). Subgroup analysis suggested that major bleeding might be higher with warfarin than with aspirin in patients over 80 years old. Conclusion Elderly patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel suffer less any-severity bleeding but have a risk of major bleeding similar to that of oral anticoagulants, with the exception of intracranial bleeding.

[Anticoagulation use in older patients with atrial fibrillation in a cardio-geriatric unit]. / Utilisation des anticoagulants chez les patients âgés atteints de fibrillation atriale dans un service de cardiogériatrie.

OBJECTIVE: Older people with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased embolic risk but they are less frequently treated with anticoagulants. We wanted to assess our current practice in a specialized service. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study including all patients older than 75 years admitted during 3 months in a cardio-geriatric unit. Patients' embolic risk (CHADS2 score), hemorrhagic risk (HAS-BLED score), anti-thrombotic treatment at arrival and any modification afterwards, were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included (mean age: 85 years). AF was known in 28 patients, of whom 20 were under anticoagulant therapy at their admission (10 fluindione, 9 warfarine, 1 dabigatran), 4 received aspirin and 4 no anti-thrombotic treatment. Only the treatment of one of these patients was modified, replacing aspirin by warfarin. AF was newly diagnosed in 6 patients, of whom anticoagulation were initiated in 4 patients (3 warfarine, 1 fluindione). Finally, 9 patients (26%) left the hospital without anticoagulant treatment. Reasons given by their attending doctors were: advanced dementia (4 patients), estimated excessive hemorrhagic risk (4), and estimated low embolic risk (1). There was a clear trend to initiate anticoagulation more frequently in patients with a newly diagnosed AF (P=0.09) CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of older patients with AF do not receive anticoagulant therapy, even after having been admitted to a specialized service. Advanced dementia and hemorrhagic risk are the reasons most frequently given for that.

Wrist Actigraphy: A Simple Way to Record Motor Activity in Elderly Patients with Dementia and Apathy or Aberrant Motor Behavior.

INTRODUCTION: In dementia, behavioral psychological symptoms are frequent and variable. OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of wrist actigraphy as a measure of disorder in motor behavior especially apathy, aberrant motor behavior, agitation and anxiety. METHODS: Cross sectional observational study of consecutive patients older than 75 years admitted to an intermediate care unit of a geriatric hospital ward during a two-year period. Psycho behavioral symptoms and cognitive status were assessed using the NPI scale and MMSE and diagnosis of dementia was done using DSMIV criteria. A wrist actigraph was worn for 10 days to record motor activity, sleep time and number of periods of sleep. RESULTS: 183 patients were included. Among patients with dementia, a significant decrease in motor activity was recorded in those with apathy from 9h to 12h and 18h to 21h (p <0.05) and in those with anxiety from 21h to 24h (p <0.05). Aberrant motor behavior in dementia was associated with a significant increase in motor activity from 21h to 24h (p <0.01). Agitation was not associated with a significant differences in motor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Wrist actigraphy can be used to record motor activity in elderly patients with dementia especially in those with apathy and aberrant motor behavior.