Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Curr Dev Nutr ; 8(4): 102143, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638556

ABSTRACT

Background: High sodium and low potassium intake are positively associated with blood pressure, a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The mean intake of sodium among United States adults exceeds the chronic disease risk reduction level of 2300 mg/d, whereas potassium intake remains lower than the recommended levels. From 2008 through 2019, there were several local and national initiatives to reduce sodium in New York City (NYC). Objectives: We aimed to update and compare estimates of sodium intake among NYC adults overall and by covariates from the 2010 Heart Follow-Up Study (HFUS) with the 2018 HFUS. We also estimated the 2018 sodium-to-potassium ratio to understand overall diet quality among demographic groups. Methods: This cross-sectional study used sodium and potassium measurements from 24-h urine collection and self-reported data from 2509 and 1656 participants in the 2018 and 2010 HFUS, respectively. The weighted mean daily intake of sodium and the sodium-to-potassium ratio were estimated. T-tests and multivariable linear regression models with tests for interactions were used to compare changes in sodium intake. Results: The mean sodium intake of adult New Yorkers in 2018 was 3292 mg/d. Sodium intake did not change from 2010 (3234 mg/d, P = 0.45) to 2018 in the overall population, although there was a decrease in sodium intake among adults 18-24 y old (3445 mg/d to 2957 mg/d, P = 0.05). The daily mean sodium-to-potassium ratio was 1.7 mg/mg. The highest sodium-to-potassium ratios were among Black females 18-44 y old (2.0) and 45-64 y old (2.2) and Black (2.1) and Latino (2.1) males between 18 and 44 y old. Conclusions: The lack of population-level changes in sodium intake and the high sodium-to-potassium ratios among Black females and younger Black and Latino males suggest that further efforts to reduce sodium in the food supply and address persistent inequities are needed.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0274044, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093825

ABSTRACT

In 2016, New York City (NYC) began enforcing a sodium warning regulation at chain restaurants, requiring placement of an icon next to any menu item containing ≥2,300 mg sodium. As shifts in consumer purchases are a potential outcome of menu labeling, we investigated whether high-sodium purchases from NYC chains changed following policy implementation. Using receipts for verification, consumer purchases were assessed at 2 full-service (FSR) and 2 quick-service (QSR) chain restaurants in NYC and Yonkers, NY, which did not implement sodium menu labeling, in 2015 and 2017. Primary outcomes included the proportion of respondents purchasing high-sodium item(s) (containing ≥2,300 mg sodium) and mean sodium content of purchases; changes were assessed by difference-in-difference regression models, adjusted for demographic and location co-variates. At both FSR and QSR, there was not a significant change in the proportion of NYC respondents purchasing 1 or more high-sodium items, relative to Yonkers (FSR difference-in-difference: -4.6%, p = 0.364; QSR difference-in-difference: -8.9%, p = 0.196). Among NYC FSR respondents, mean sodium content of purchases significantly declined compared to Yonkers (difference-in-difference: -524 mg, p = 0.012); no changes in mean sodium were observed among QSR participants (difference-in-difference: 258 mg, p = 0.185). Although there was a reduction in mean sodium content of purchases among NYC FSR patrons following sodium warning icon implementation, the mechanism behind the relatively larger NYC decline is unknown.


Subject(s)
Restaurants , Sodium , Humans , New York City , Food Labeling , Consumer Behavior , Energy Intake
3.
Health Place ; 66: 102441, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco advertising in retailers influences smoking, but little research has examined how this relationship differs among population subgroups. This study merged data on neighborhood cigarette advertising with geocoded survey data to assess the association between advertising prevalence and current smoking among New York City (NYC) residents, and whether demographic and psychological characteristics moderate this relationship. METHODS: Audit data from a stratified, random sample of 796 NYC tobacco retailers generated neighborhood prevalence estimates of cigarette advertising, which were linked with unweighted 2017 NYC Community Health Survey data (n = 7837 adult respondents with residential geocodes). Multilevel regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of current smoking by level of neighborhood cigarette advertising (quartiles). Interactions assessed differences in this relationship by demographic characteristics and current depression (analyses conducted in 2019). RESULTS: There was no main effect of advertising on smoking status or significant interactions with demographic variables, but current depression was an effect modifier (p = 0.045). Cigarette advertising was associated with current smoking among those with current depression (p = 0.023), not those without (p = 0.920). Specifically, respondents with depression who resided in neighborhoods in the highest quartile for cigarette advertising prevalence had higher odds of current smoking, compared to those living in the lowest advertising quartile [aOR: 1.72 (1.04, 2.86)]. CONCLUSION: Retail cigarette advertising may serve as an environmental cue to smoke among adults with depression. Efforts to restrict or counteract this practice, such as the development of community-level public health interventions and counter-marketing programs, may particularly benefit those with depression and, perhaps, other mental health disorders.


Subject(s)
Advertising , Tobacco Products , Adult , Commerce , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , Smoking/epidemiology
4.
Ethn Dis ; 30(1): 97-108, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31969789

ABSTRACT

Objectives: We assessed differences in trends, prevalence, and sociodemographic correlates of current smoking among several predominant Hispanic/Latino heritage groups (Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Central and South Americans, and other Hispanic/Latinos) in New York City (NYC). We additionally compared current smoking prevalence between heritage groups and non-Hispanic/Latino Whites. Design and Methods: Data from the Community Health Survey, a representative, dual-frame landline/cellphone survey, were analyzed to assess age-adjusted prevalence of current smoking, separately among heritage groups from 2003-2016. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% CIs for current smoking by Hispanic/Latino heritage group relative to non-Hispanic/Latino Whites in combined 2012-2016 data. Logistic regression was also used to examine correlates of smoking among each heritage group, separately. Results: Between 2003-2016, current smoking prevalence decreased among all Hispanic/Latinos heritage groups except Puerto Ricans, who had the highest smoking prevalence among all groups examined. Sex-stratified trend analyses showed decreases among all groups except Puerto Rican and other Hispanic/Latino males. In multivariable-adjusted models, relative to non-Hispanic/Latino Whites, there was no association with current smoking among Puerto Ricans, but odds of smoking were lower among all other heritage groups. Female sex was inversely associated with current smoking among all heritage groups, and acculturation was positively associated with smoking among all groups except Central/South Americans. Lower educational attainment was strongly associated with smoking among Puerto Ricans. Conclusions: Lack of progress in reducing smoking among Puerto Ricans in NYC is concerning. Opportunities for cultural, sex-specific, and other targeted outreach to this community should be explored.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Puerto Rico/ethnology , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data
5.
Tob Control ; 29(3): 326-331, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147472

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Imposing policies that increase tobacco prices is a key strategy for reducing smoking prevalence, although it may result in more cigarette trafficking. In 2013, New York City (NYC) passed the Sensible Tobacco Enforcement (STE) law requiring cigarettes be sold for a minimum price of $10.50 per pack. To evaluate whether cigarette price increases changed patterns of behaviour related to cigarette tax evasion, we examined littered pack study data from 2011 and 2015. METHODS: Littered cigarette packs were collected from a random sample of NYC census tracts in 2011 and 2015. The proportions of cigarette packs with proper local, known non-local, foreign or unknown, and no tax stamp were calculated. Changes in volume, source and consumption of domestically trafficked cigarettes over time were estimated. RESULTS: In 2011, 255 packs with cellophane were collected; in 2015, 226 packs with cellophane were collected. Packs without proper local stamp increased from 60.7% in 2011 to 76.3% in 2015 (p<0.05) and those with foreign or unknown stamp increased from 11.6% in 2011 to 31.4% in 2015 (p<0.05). The percentage of domestically sourced packs attributed to domestic trafficking increased significantly from a range of 47.9% to 52.8% in 2011 to a range of 59.4% to 63.2% in 2015. CONCLUSION: While the trafficking rate among domestically sourced cigarettes increased between 2011 and 2015 (before and after the STE minimum price floor on cigarette packs was in place), there was a decline in total consumption of domestically trafficked cigarettes due to a significant increase in consumption of foreign-sourced cigarettes. Jurisdictions considering price measures should bolster monitoring and enforcement efforts to maximise public health impact. Given the interstate nature of cigarette trafficking in the USA, Federal intervention would be optimal.


Subject(s)
Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Products/legislation & jurisprudence , Cellophane , Commerce/trends , Drug Trafficking , Humans , New York City , Policy , Product Packaging , Smoking/economics , Smoking/trends , Tobacco Products/economics
6.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 46(1): 102-108, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023928

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The identification of persons with or at risk for chronic diseases is a new practice paradigm for oral healthcare. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease of particular importance to oral health providers. This study sought to understand healthcare utilization patterns that would support the introduction of this new practice paradigm. METHODS: The primary and oral healthcare utilization patterns of New York City (NYC) adults were assessed using data collected from the 2013 NYC Community Health Survey. We stratified healthcare utilization patterns by type of provider, insurance, DM diagnosis and DM modifiable risk factors. RESULTS: Of 6.4 million NYC adults, an estimated 676 000 (10.5%) reported a previous diagnosis of DM, and 3.9 million (69.5%) were identified with one or more modifiable risk factor for DM. Of these at risk individuals, 2.2 million (58.9%) received dental services in the past 12 months, and 545 000 (14.3%) did not see a primary care provider during the same period. Of the approximately 1.16 million adults without health insurance, an estimated 338 000 (26.2%) had a dental visit only. CONCLUSION: Healthcare utilization patterns in this urban setting suggest that oral healthcare providers can support the identification of patients with and at risk for DM who may otherwise not have the opportunity for screening.


Subject(s)
Dental Care , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Office Visits , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Dental Care/methods , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Young Adult
7.
Prev Med ; 73: 94-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25655710

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have observed higher rates of smoking among adults with mental health conditions. We examined posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and smoking over a 7-9year period among adults with firsthand exposure to the 9/11 attacks enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Registry. METHOD: Data were collected at three waves: W1 (2003-04), W2 (2006-07), and W3 (2011-12). Enrollees aged ≥25 at W1 and who completed all three waves (n=34,458) were categorized by smoker-type: non-smoker, non-daily (smoked some days in last 30days), light (1-10 cigarettes per day (CPD)), or heavy (11+ CPD). Enrollees who smoked at W1 but not W3 were considered to have quit. PTSD was defined as a score of ≥44 on the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. RESULTS: Smoking declined significantly from W1 (12.6%) to W3 (9.2%). Smoking prevalence was higher among enrollees with PTSD. In multivariable models, odds of quitting were 25-39% lower among heavy, light, and non-daily smokers with PTSD compared to those without. CONCLUSION: PTSD was associated with reduced odds of quitting regardless of smoker-type. Disaster-exposed smokers with PTSD are likely in need of more supportive services in order to abstain from smoking.


Subject(s)
September 11 Terrorist Attacks/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Registries , September 11 Terrorist Attacks/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/complications
9.
Tob Control ; 24(4): 362-8, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24610054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Light smokers represent an increasing share of adult smokers in various parts of the world including New York City (NYC). Since 2007, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has aired hard-hitting antitobacco media campaigns paired with time-limited nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) giveaways. We evaluated an original antitobacco media campaign, developed to increase awareness of smoking risks and encourage cessation service use among light smokers in NYC. METHODS: We compared cessation service request volume during the campaign to historical periods without ads targeting light smokers. We used a cross-sectional online panel survey to assess the ad's perceived effectiveness and its impact on learning something new, quit intentions and concern for smoking-related health risks among non-daily, light daily and heavy daily smokers. RESULTS: The proportion of light smokers among smokers requesting cessation services increased 50% (from 13% to 20%) relative to previous time-limited NRT giveaways. Compared to heavy daily smokers, non-daily (aOR: 1.95, p<0.05) and light daily (aOR: 2.27, p<0.05) smokers were more likely to express increased concern about smoking-related health risks after viewing the ad. Perceived effectiveness of the ad did not differ by smoker type. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that light smokers were receptive to a targeted antitobacco message encouraging use of cessation services. The campaign appears to have been particularly effective in increasing smoking-related health concerns in this group. The lack of difference in perceived ad effectiveness by smoker type suggests the potential to develop such ads without sacrificing broad impact.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mass Media , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Young Adult
10.
J Community Health ; 38(4): 670-8, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23468320

ABSTRACT

This study aims to describe the prevalence of preventive dental care among New York City (NYC) children, including disparities by race/ethnicity or poverty and to identify health care utilization factors associated with these outcomes. Data were obtained from the 2009 NYC Child Community Health Survey. Descriptive statistics were calculated for preventive dental visits in the past 12 months among children aged 2-12 years (n = 2,435) and receipt of sealants among children aged 6-12 years (n = 1,416). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs). One in four (23.3 %) NYC children aged 2-12 years, including 57.3 % of 2-3-year olds, had no preventive dental visit in the past 12 months. Lack of preventive visits was more prevalent among Asian/Pacific Islander children compared with non-Hispanic white children (aPR 1.42 [95 % CI 1.07-1.89]), and among children living in poorer households compared with wealthier households (aPR 1.47 [95 % CI 1.13-1.92]). Two-thirds (64.5 %) of children aged 6-12 years never had sealants. Compared with non-Hispanic white children, Asian/Pacific Islander (aPR 1.26 [95 % CI 1.01-1.56]), non-Hispanic black (aPR 1.24 [95 % CI 1.06-1.46]), and Hispanic (aPR 1.21 [95 % CI 1.04-1.41]) children were more likely not to have sealants, as were children without a personal health care provider compared with children with a provider (aPR 1.33 [95 % CI 1.14-1.56]). Disparities in preventive dental care exist by race/ethnicity, poverty, and health care utilization. Personal health care providers may improve children's oral health by linking them to preventive dental care and promoting sealant application.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Female , Health Care Surveys , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , New York City/epidemiology , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Socioeconomic Factors , White People/statistics & numerical data
11.
Am J Mens Health ; 5(3): 225-35, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20798146

ABSTRACT

To assess the role of having a primary care provider (PCP) in men's up-to-date receipt of recommended preventive services (colonoscopy, pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccination, cholesterol and blood pressure screenings), data from the 2005 and 2006 New York City Community Health Surveys (N = 3,728 [2006], 2,810 [2005]) were analyzed. PCP prevalence and men's uptake of each service, overall and by age, race/ethnicity, education, income, insurance status, marital status, and nativity, were evaluated. After controlling for insurance status and other factors, having a PCP significantly predicted receipt of each service (adjusted prevalence ratio from 1.12 [1.08, 1.16] to 1.72 [1.35, 2.22]) and total services. Colonoscopy and seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccination receipt were below 70% with or without a PCP. Efforts to increase the proportion of men having a PCP are needed to improve receipt of recommended services. Maximizing awareness and provision of low-use preventive services may be useful.


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Physicians, Primary Care , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure , Cholesterol/blood , Colonoscopy , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...