Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 49: 40-47, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28865300

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder characterized by joint tissue damage and pain. Knee joint distraction has been introduced as a joint preserving surgical procedure to postpone knee arthroplasty. An often used standard externally fixation device for distraction poses a burden to patients due to the absence of joint flexion during the 6weeks treatment. Therefore, a personalized articulating distraction device was developed. The aim of this study was to test technical feasibility of this device. METHODS: Based on an often applied rigid device, using equal bone pin positions and connectors, a hinge mechanism was developed consisting of a cam-following system for reproducing the complex joint-specific knee kinematics. In support, a device was developed for capturing the joint-specific sagittal plane articulation. The obtained kinematic data were translated into joint-specific cam shapes that were installed bilaterally in the hinge mechanism of the distraction device, as such providing personalized knee motion. Distraction of 5mm was performed within a range of motion of 30deg. joint flexion. Pre-clinical evaluation of the working principle was performed on human cadaveric legs and system stiffness characteristics were biomechanically evaluated. FINDINGS: The desired range of motion was obtained and distraction was maintained under physiologically representative loading. Moreover, the joint-specific approach demonstrated tolerance of deviations from anatomical and alignment origin during initial placement of the developed distraction device. INTERPRETATION: Articulation during knee distraction is considered technically feasible and has potential to decrease burden and improve acceptance of distraction therapy. Testing of clinical feasibility is warranted.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Nails , External Fixators , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Knee/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Motion , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
2.
Surg Endosc ; 21(6): 1025-31, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17279305

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a mechanical minimally invasive manipulator for endoscopic surgery. In contrast to currently available motorized master-slave manipulators, this mechanical manipulator consists of two purely mechanical, hand-controlled endoscopic arms with joints that allow seven degrees of freedom (DOF). METHODS: For the study, 30 medical students performed four different tasks in a pelvic trainer box using either two conventional endoscopic needleholders or a set of mechanical manipulators. The exercise consisted of four different tasks: repositioning of coins, rope passing, passing of a suture through rings, and tying of a surgical knot. All experiments were recorded on videotape (S-VHS), and the data were analyzed afterwards by an independent observer using a quantitative time-action analysis. RESULTS: A significant difference in the number of total actions (including failures) favoring the mechanical manipulator group was shown in most exercises. A significant difference in failures per task was shown in favor of the mechanical manipulator group as well. There was no significant difference shown in the total time per exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The tasks clearly demonstrated the efficacy of the mechanical manipulator, although some technical flaws emerged during the experiments. Considering the fact that a first prototype of the mechanical manipulator was tested, modifications are to be expected in a next model. These experiments show the potential of the mechanical manipulator, and it is expected to be a competitive and economical instrument for endoscopic surgery in the near future.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/education , Robotics , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Videotape Recording
3.
J Biomech ; 35(12): 1665-70, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12445620

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of anterior laxity of the ankle joint complex is a difficult clinical problem. Currently, the prime determinant for anterolateral ligament function is the subjective manual examination of anterior laxity of the ankle joint complex. An instrumented dynamic test was developed for objective measurement of anterior laxity of the ankle joint complex. The principle of the test was to apply a force-impulse to the calcaneus, within the muscle reflex time, and to measure anterior-posterior and mediolateral rotation. The test was performed on a cadaver specimen and on 15 volunteers of which five subjects suffered from chronic one-sided lateral ankle ligament instability. In the cadaver test, anterior translation values increased from 5 to 11 mm, after cutting the anterior talofibular ligament and subsequently cutting the calcaneofibular ligament. In the 10 normal subjects, the mean anterior translation value was 6.7 mm (+/-1.9 mm). The relative variation of the test result within a measurement session was 2.5% (+/-1.6%). Between the sessions the relative laxity variation was 2.6% (+/-2.6%). In the ten normal subjects the mean right-left difference was not significantly different from zero. In four out of the five patients it was more than 2mm. As in the cadaver test in all measurements, the mediolateral rotations were small (<2.5 degrees ). The volunteers complained about same pain at the heel after multiple test sessions. In conclusion the dynamic, functional test appears to be capable of objectively measuring a value for anterior laxity of the ankle joint complex reflecting the functional status of the anterolateral ankle ligaments.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint/physiopathology , Biomedical Engineering/instrumentation , Joint Instability/diagnosis , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Physical Examination/instrumentation , Range of Motion, Articular , Ankle Injuries/complications , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Equipment Design , Humans , Joint Instability/etiology , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Movement , Reproducibility of Results , Rotation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Weight-Bearing
4.
Surg Endosc ; 16(1): 142-7, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11961625

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Instrument positioners can position and lock a laparoscopic instrument. This study uses time-action analysis to evaluate objectively whether IPs can substitute for a surgical assistant efficiently and safely. METHODS: In four hospitals, 78 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were randomly assisted by a surgical assistant or an instrument positioner (AESOP and PASSIST) The efficiency and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analyzed with respect to time, number and type of actions, positioning accuracy, and peroperative complications. A questionnaire evaluated the difficulties for each operation and the comfort of instrument positioner use. RESULTS: The PASSIST and AESOP were able to replace the surgical assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomies without significantly changing either the efficiency or the safety of the operation. The questionnaire showed that the surgeons preferred to operate with an instrument positioner. CONCLUSION: This study assessed objectively that instrument positioners can substitute for a surgical assistant efficiently and safely in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/instrumentation , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 108(7): 1915-21; discussion 1922-3, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11743376

ABSTRACT

The fibula osteocutaneous free flap has become the preferred method for most cases of mandibular reconstruction after oncologic surgical ablation. To recreate the parabolic form of the mandible, the fibula has to be divided up into segments using a closed wedge osteotomy technique. The number of osteotomies is preferably kept to a minimum so that segmental periosteal circulation is not compromised and also to keep operating time to a minimum. The limited number of osteotomies creates an angular contour. The aim of this study was to establish the degree to which overcorrection or undercorrection would occur when a subtotal reconstruction from ramus to ramus was simulated using five bony segments and four osteotomies. The study was carried out using 30 preserved jaws; the contour lines of the jaws were transferred onto tracing paper using a cardboard template. The contour of the mandible was divided into five sections (ramus, body, symphysis, body, and ramus). Because of the cutting off of the curvature in the original jaw outline, the lateral side of the body will become narrower and the chin broader. This also results in an underprojection (displacement) of the chin. To follow the original contour of the jaw as accurately as possible, all these anomalies must be minimized. The amount of under- and overprojection is calculated for a displacement of 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 mm of the chin. The most accurate reconstruction of the mandibular contour is achieved with a displacement of 1.5 or 2.5 mm. To preserve sufficient periosteal circulation, the minimum width of bone segments must be 15 mm or more. This concerns especially the symphysis section. On the basis of a fibula thickness of 14 mm, the internal bone width of the symphysis section is calculated. With a displacement of 1.5 mm, the average internal width of the bone segment is 14.8 mm, with a range of 9.9 to 23.0 mm (95 percent confidence interval, 12.8 to 16.7 mm). Therefore, a displacement of 2.5 mm with an internal bone width of 16.4 mm is preferred (range, 11.9 to 24.8 mm; 95 percent confidence interval, 15.5 to 18.2 mm). The loss of lateral projection is minimal (5.8 mm) and the resulting chin width is acceptable (average, 35.0 mm). In conclusion, we propose that in a subtotal procedure, an acceptable jaw reconstruction can be achieved with a limited number of osteotomies. The bone length of the symphysis section remains within safe limits. If the defect is of limited dimensions, then the resulting jaw contour is even more accurate.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Fibula/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Models, Anatomic , Osteotomy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgical Flaps , Anthropometry , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery
6.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 10(6): 331-5, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11132913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During minimally invasive procedures, an assistant controls the camera and often a laparoscopic grasper. Ideally, the surgeon should be able to manipulate the instruments because the indirect way of control complicates the surgeon's observation and actions and disturbs eye-hand coordination. Reported replacements for the assistant are active positioners, "robots," such as the Aesop and the EndoAssist. Because positioning instruments is often a static task, the Academic Medical Center has developed a passive assistant for instrument positioning (PASSIST) to allow solo surgery. METHODS: The PASSIST was designed to be simple, fully autoclavable, slender, and stiff. The joints have adjustable friction and spring compensation for stabilizing the instrument in a fixed position, enabling intuitive single-hand repositioning. RESULTS: The PASSIST has been tested in three laparoscopic procedures: cholecystectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and spondylodesis. In all of these procedures, the assistant could be replaced satisfactorily, and the surgeon was able to manipulate all of the instruments on his own. CONCLUSION: Solo surgery using the PASSIST is feasible. The positioner enables the surgeon to manipulate the viewpoint, to have a stable image, and therefore to improve observation and manipulating actions.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopes , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...