Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection- enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gadodiamide-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with single and triple doses in the assessment of abdominal arterial stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients were included in the randomized, double-blind, phase III multicenter trial. Results of MR angiography with 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg doses of gadodiamide were compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and according to dose. RESULTS: No serious adverse events were observed. The mean contrast index at the region proximal to the primary stenosis was significantly higher in the triple-dose group (P =.03). Mean 95% CI values for the difference in depicted degree of stenosis between DSA and postcontrast MR angiography improved from -3.4% +/- 4.7 (SD) in the single-dose group to -1.2% +/- 4.7 in the triple-dose group. Mean values for overall image quality on the visual analogue scale improved with the triple dose (P =.02). Confidence in diagnosis was high at postcontrast MR angiography in 88% and 96% of cases in the single- and triple-dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography performed with single and triple doses is safe and effective for assessing major abdominal arterial stenoses. Although high agreement between MR angiography and DSA was achieved with both doses, triple-dose MR angiography was superior in the evaluations of image quality, degree of arterial stenoses, and confidence in diagnosis.

Persistent mirror movements: functional MR imaging of the hand motor cortex.

PURPOSE: To compare cortical areas involved in hand motor function in patients with persistent motor movements with those in healthy control subjects by using functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients (five patients with autosomal-dominant mirror movements, three with Kallmann syndrome, one with Wildervanck syndrome) and 10 healthy control subjects participated in the study. Functional MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with a two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence. Participants were imaged while performing sequential finger-thumb opposition and during a rest period. RESULTS: During unimanual intentional movements, MR imaging in all control subjects showed increased signal intensity along the superior bend of the central sulcus contralateral to the moved hand. This increase was predominantly located in a region that included the medial part of the precentral gyrus. In contrast, MR imaging in patients with mirror movements showed bilateral activity in the medial region of the precentral gyrus. CONCLUSION: Bifurcations of the corticospinal tract may not be solely responsible for mirror movements. Bilateral activity of the primary motor cortex seems to play an additional role.

Topography of the cortical motor hand area: prospective study with functional MR imaging and direct motor mapping at surgery.

PURPOSE: To localize the cortical motor hand area with functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and electrical stimulation at surgery and to detect changes due to central lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fast-gradient-echo and functional MR images of the brain were acquired in four healthy volunteers and six patients with tumors in the central region before, during, and after repetitive opening and closing of the hand. Open brain surgery was performed, and the exposed cortex was stimulated. RESULTS: At functional MR imaging, circumscribed changes in signal intensity that correlated in time with the task were seen in the central region of the contralateral brain. In the healthy volunteers, the area of change was spotlike and projected into the posterior bank of the precentral gyrus. In four of the six patients, this area was diffuse and projected into the precentral gyrus. The locations of the cortical hand area as determined with intrasurgical mapping and functional MR imaging were identical. CONCLUSION: Identification of the cortical area responsible for motor hand function was similar with functional MR imaging and with direct stimulation at surgery. A space-occupying lesion can change the cortical representation of motor hand function.