Unresponsiveness of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Bivalirudin in Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the standard for monitoring bivalirudin but demonstrates a nonlinear response at higher drug concentrations. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between bivalirudin dose and aPTT in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine a threshold where aPTT unresponsiveness occurs. Two hundred fourteen adults receiving bivalirudin during ECMO between 2018 and 2022 were included. Piecewise regression in a linear mixed effects model was used to determine a bivalirudin dose threshold of 0.21 mg/kg/hr for aPTT unresponsiveness. For doses of less than 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 135), every 0.1 mg/kg/hr dose increase led to an aPTT increase of 11.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.85-13.20) seconds compared to only a 3.81 (95% CI = 1.55-6.06) seconds increase when dose was greater than or equal to 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 79) (pinteraction < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, venovenous configuration (odds ratio [OR] = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.38-5.77) and higher fibrinogen concentration (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42) were associated with greater odds of unresponsiveness, whereas older age (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98), kidney dysfunction (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.25-0.92), and a higher baseline aPTT (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.97) were associated with lower odds. Alternative methods are necessary to ascertain bivalirudin's hemostatic impact when doses exceed 0.21 mg/kg/hr during ECMO.

Assessment of bleeding risk in low-weight patients receiving prophylactic subcutaneous unfractionated heparin.

BACKGROUND: Underweight patients may be at an increased risk of bleeding while receiving venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. Additional evidence is needed to identify patient-specific factors associated with bleeding. The objective of the study was to describe the incidence and identify risk factors associated with bleeding in low-weight (⩽ 60 kg) adult patients receiving subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (SQH) for VTE prophylaxis. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, nested case-control study of low-weight patients receiving SQH for VTE prophylaxis for ⩾ 48 hours. Cases, patients with clinically relevant bleeding while receiving SQH, and controls, patients without a bleeding event, were matched in a 1:3 ratio for age, sex, primary service (surgical or medical), and time at risk of bleeding on SQH to determine factors associated with bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 3761 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 38 cases of clinically relevant bleeding were identified. The bleeding incidence was 1% at hospital day 6 and 2.8% at hospital day 14. Most patients in this study (69%) received SQH 5000 units three times daily. ICU admission at SQH start was associated with bleeding, OR 2.97 (95% CI 1.21-7.29). CONCLUSION: Bleeding in low-weight patients on prophylactic SQH was uncommon. Patients admitted to the ICU at time of SQH start may be at a higher risk of bleeding. Further studies are needed to detect additional risk factors associated with bleeding and investigate the effects of reduced dosing in this population.

A Genotype-Phenotype Analysis of Glutathione Peroxidase 4 in Human Atrial Myocardium and Its Association with Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

Heterogeneity in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following heart surgery implies that underlying genetic and/or physiological factors impart a higher risk of this complication to certain patients. Glutathione peroxidase-4 (GPx4) is a vital selenoenzyme responsible for neutralizing lipid peroxides, mediators of oxidative stress known to contribute to postoperative arrhythmogenesis. Here, we sought to determine whether GPX4 single nucleotide variants are associated with POAF, and whether any of these variants are linked with altered GPX4 enzyme content or activity in myocardial tissue. Sequencing analysis was performed across the GPX4 coding region within chromosome 19 from a cohort of patients (N = 189) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (−/+ valve) surgery. GPx4 enzyme content and activity were also analyzed in matching samples of atrial myocardium from these patients. Incidence of POAF was 25% in this cohort. Five GPX4 variants were associated with POAF risk (permutated p ≤ 0.05), and eight variants associated with altered myocardial GPx4 content and activity (p < 0.05). One of these variants (rs713041) is a well-known modifier of cardiovascular disease risk. Collectively, these findings suggest GPX4 variants are potential risk modifiers and/or predictors of POAF. Moreover, they illustrate a genotype−phenotype link with this selenoenzyme, which will inform future mechanistic studies.

Opioid abuse surveillance in patients with endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Opioid abuse is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and injection drug use (IDU) is a common form of opioid abuse. IDU is a major risk factor for infections including infective endocarditis (IE). OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of opioid abuse among patients with IE in both patient problem lists and diagnostic codes and describe underlying patient characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1-1-2010 to 11-19-2018 of a large academic medical center's patients with documented IE was performed. Demographic, comorbidity, opioid prescription data and records of drug abuse in both the patient's problem list and ICD9/10 codes were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 796 patients with documented IE, 105 patients (13.2%) had opioid abuse or related IDU in their problem list, but only 22 received an ICD-9/10 code associated with drug abuse. IE patients with opioid abuse were generally younger (43.6 vs 61.7 years [P < 0.001]), had fewer chronic comorbidities, and were prescribed opioids more often (86.7% vs 53.8% [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid abuse and IDU are commonly recorded in the problem list of patients with IE, but opioid abuse is frequently not listed as a diagnosis in administrative billing codes.