Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1831, 2021 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In July 1984, Taiwan officially began a nationwide hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination program where only infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers were vaccinated free of charge until June 1986. However, from July 1986, all infants were vaccinated against HBV. The impact of the July 1986 HBV vaccination program on first-time blood donors has not been exhaustively studied. We, therefore, determined the risk of HBV among male and female first-time blood donors born before and after the July 1986 HBV vaccination program in Taiwan. METHODS: Initially, we recruited 857,310 first-time blood donors whose data were collected between 2013 and 2018 from 5 blood donation centers in Taiwan. However, we excluded donors with incomplete and outlying data (n = 12,213) and those born between July 1984 and June 1986 (n = 21,054). The final study participants comprised 9118 HBV positive and 814,925 HBV negative individuals. We divided the participants into two birth cohorts (born before and after July 1986) and assumed that those born before July 1986 were not vaccinated at birth while those born after July 1986 were vaccinated. RESULTS: The prevalence of HBV among those born before and after July 1986 was 4.53 and 0.25%, respectively. Individuals born after July 1986 had a lower risk of HBV than those born before July 1986. The adjusted odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.16, 0.13-0.19. Men had a higher risk of HBV than women (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.34-1.47). The interaction between sex and birth date was significant (p-value = 0.0067). Stratification of participants by birth date revealed a higher risk of HBV in men compared to women in both birth cohorts. The OR, 95% CI was 1.47, 1.40-1.55 for those born before July 1986 but declined to 1.15, 1.02-1.29 for those born after July 1986. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of HBV was lower among those born after than those born before the July 1986 vaccination program. In both cohorts, the risk was high in men relative to women. The seemingly protective effect among those born after July 1986 was higher in women than men.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B , Blood Donors , Female , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B Vaccines , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Taiwan/epidemiology , Vaccination
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(44): e17758, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689834

ABSTRACT

The process for blood donation is considered safe, but some adverse events have been reported. Risk factors for adverse events were assessed in this study.A retrospective case-control study was conducted to investigate the risk factors for adverse events after blood donation between 2010 and 2013. Variables such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), donation status, donation volume, donation site, pre-donation systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pre-donation diastolic blood pressure were compared between donors with and without adverse events. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the joint effects of age, gender, and donation status on adverse events.The incidence of adverse events among adult blood donations was 1287/1,253,678 (0.1%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, blood donors aged <35 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.57-3.48), of female gender (OR, 3.30, 95% CI, 2.62-4.15), and with first-time donor status (OR, 6.40, 95% CI, 5.17-7.93), donation of 500 mL (OR, 2.22, 95% CI, 1.83-2.69), predonation SBP <124 mm Hg (OR, 1.25, 95% CI,1.05-1.48) and BMI <24 kg/m (OR, 1.67, 95% CI, 1.42-1.96) were associated with increased likelihood of adverse event. Further analysis with joint effects method revealed that first-time female donors aged <35 years are associated with the highest odds of adverse events when compared with repeat male donors aged ≧35 years (OR, 100.57, 95% CI, 48.45-208.75).The findings of our study should prove useful in identifying donors at risk and planning appropriate strategies for the prevention of adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal/adverse effects , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...