Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Noise Health ; 13(50): 51-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21173487

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of noise sensitivity with self-reported hearing disability and hearing levels, with consideration of the role of self-reported history of noise exposure and use of hearing protectors. The study is based on the Finnish Twin Cohort. In 1988, a noise questionnaire was sent to 1005 twin pairs, 1495 individuals (688 men, 807 women) replied. The age range was 31-88 years. Information on some potential confounders was obtained from the questionnaire in 1981 for the same individuals. A subsample of thirty-eight elderly women with noise sensitivity response from 1988 had audiometry data from 2000 to 2001. Noise sensitivity was associated with self-reported hearing disability among all subjects [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-2.12] and among women (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.19-3.04), but no-more significantly among men (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.86-1.98). The association was primarily seen among younger subjects (50 years or less). The difference between noise sensitive and non-noise sensitive elderly women in the average of thresholds at frequencies of 0.5-4 kHz in the better ear was not significant (Pr = 0.18). Noise sensitivity did not modify the association of hearing disability with the self-reported history of occupational noise exposure. Noise sensitivity was associated with the use of hearing protectors at work. The study shows the importance of recognizing the noise sensitive in noise effect studies, since sensitivity in annoyance has implications in most of the effect categories.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/etiology , Noise/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry , Case-Control Studies , Ear Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Female , Finland , Hearing Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Hypertension/etiology , Logistic Models , Loudness Perception/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Self Report , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Twin Studies as Topic
2.
Pediatrics ; 125(1): e1-8, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20008417

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have evaluated dexamethasone for prevention of hearing loss in childhood bacterial meningitis, but results have varied. We compared dexamethasone and/or glycerol recipients with placebo recipients, and measured hearing at 3 threshold levels. METHODS: Children aged 2 months to 16 years with meningitis were treated with ceftriaxone but were double-blindly randomly assigned to receive adjuvant dexamethasone intravenously, glycerol orally, both agents, or neither agent. We used the Glasgow coma scale to grade the presenting status. The end points were the better ear's ability to detect sounds of >40 dB, >or=60 dB, and >or=80 dB, with these thresholds indicating any, moderate-to-severe, or severe impairment, respectively. All tests were interpreted by an external audiologist. Influence of covariates in the treatment groups was examined by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 383 children, mostly with meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b or Streptococcus pneumoniae, 101 received dexamethasone, 95 received dexamethasone and glycerol, 92 received glycerol, and 95 received placebo. Only the presenting condition and young age predicted impairment independently through all threshold levels. Each lowering point in the Glasgow scale increased the risk by 15% to 21% (odds ratio: 1.20, 1.21, and 1.15 [95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.35, 1.07-1.37, and 1.01-1.31]; P = .005, .003, and .039) for any, moderate-to-severe, or severe impairment, respectively. Each increasing month of age decreased the risk by 2% to 6% (P = .0001, .0007, and .041, respectively). Neither dexamethasone nor glycerol prevented hearing loss at these levels regardless of the causative agent or timing of antimicrobial agent. CONCLUSIONS: With bacterial meningitis, the child's presenting status and young age are the most important predictors of hearing impairment. Little relief is obtained from current adjuvant medications.


Subject(s)
Ceftriaxone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Glycerol/administration & dosage , Hearing Loss/drug therapy , Meningitis, Bacterial/complications , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Audiometry , Child , Child, Preschool , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infusions, Intravenous , Logistic Models , Male , Meningitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Meningitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Meningitis, Haemophilus/complications , Meningitis, Haemophilus/diagnosis , Meningitis, Haemophilus/drug therapy , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/complications , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/diagnosis , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/drug therapy , Odds Ratio , Probability , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...