Diversity and representation in ADHD psychosocial treatment research: A comprehensive synthesis with data from over 10,000 participants.

Demographic data from nearly 50 years of treatment research for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are synthesized. Comprehensive search identified ADHD treatment studies that were between-group designs, included a psychosocial, evidence-based treatment, and were conducted in the United States. One hundred and twenty-six studies that included 10,604 youth were examined. Reporting of demographics varied with 48% of studies (k = 61) reporting ethnicity, 73% (k = 92) reporting race, 80% (k = 101) reporting age (M age = 8.81, SD = 2.82), and 88% (k = 111) reporting gender. Most participants identified as non-Hispanic/Latine (15.99% Hispanic/Latine), White (62.54%), and boys (74.39%; 24.47% girls). Since the 1970s, zero youth in ADHD treatment studies identified as Middle Eastern/North African, 0.1% were American Indian/Alaskan Native or Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander, 1.77% were Asian, 15.10% were Black, and 3.14% were Multiracial. Based on publication year, the proportions of girls, racially minoritized youth, and Hispanic/Latine youth included in ADHD treatment research have increased over time. Girls, non-binary and non-cisgender youth, young children, adolescents, Hispanic/Latine youth, and youth from all racial groups other than White are underrepresented in ADHD treatment research. Research gaps are discussed, and recommendations for comprehensive demographic reporting in child and adolescent psychological research are provided.

Family engagement in a behavioral parenting intervention: A randomized comparison of telehealth versus office-based treatment formats.

OBJECTIVE: Despite effective treatment options, many families-especially those from marginalized backgrounds-lack access to quality care for their children's behavioral difficulties. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a prominent format for the delivery of outpatient services, with potential to increase access to quality care. Although telehealth-delivered parenting interventions are associated with positive clinical outcomes, limited research has examined whether telehealth formats improve treatment engagement relative to office-based care. The present study is the first controlled comparison of engagement across office-based parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and internet-delivered PCIT (iPCIT). METHOD: Children ages 3-5 years, and their caregiver(s) (N = 40) participated in a randomized trial comparing iPCIT to office-based PCIT in the treatment of behavioral problems. Analyses examined the effects of treatment format on engagement (i.e., missed sessions, premature treatment discontinuation, homework completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment satisfaction). Logistic and linear regressions further explored whether treatment format moderated the effects of common predictors of treatment engagement (i.e., family economic means, racial/ethnic background, caregiver stress). RESULTS: iPCIT improved attendance rates relative to office-based PCIT, especially for families from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds. At the same time, among families with relatively higher levels of caregiver stress, office-based PCIT was associated with lower dropout rates and improved treatment alliance and satisfaction, relative to iPCIT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first experimental support that telehealth formats can improve treatment attendance in behavioral parenting interventions. Findings highlight nuances in treatment engagement across treatment formats that reveal limits to the extent telehealth transcends engagement concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Telehealth Treatment of Behavior Problems in Young Children With Developmental Delay: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Early behavior problems in children with developmental delay (DD) are prevalent and impairing, but service barriers persist. Controlled studies examining telehealth approaches are limited, particularly for children with DD. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a telehealth parenting intervention for behavior problems in young children with DD. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 17, 2016, to December 15, 2020, in which children with DD and externalizing behavior problems were recruited from early intervention and randomly assigned to a telehealth parenting intervention or control group and evaluated through a 12-month follow-up. Most children were from ethnic or racial minoritized backgrounds. Over one-half of children were in extreme poverty or low income-need ratio categories. Interventions: Internet-delivered parent-child interaction therapy (iPCIT), which leverages videoconferencing to provide live coaching of home-based caregiver-child interactions. Families received 20 weeks of iPCIT (provided in English or in Spanish) or referrals as usual (RAU). Main Outcomes and Measures: Observational and caregiver-report measures of child and caregiver behaviors and caregiving stress were examined at preintervention, midtreatment, and postintervention and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Results: The sample included a total of 150 children (mean [SD] age, 36.2 [1.0] months; 111 male children [74%]) and their caregivers with 75 each randomly assigned to iPCIT or RAU groups. Children receiving iPCIT relative to RAU displayed significantly lower levels of externalizing problems (postintervention Cohen d = 0.48; 6-month Cohen d = 0.49; 12-month Cohen d = 0.50) and significantly higher levels of compliance to caregiver direction after treatment. Of those children with data at postintervention, greater clinically significant change was observed at postintervention for children in the iPCIT group (50 [74%]) than for those in the RAU group (30 [42%]), which was maintained at the 6-month but not the 12-month follow-up. iPCIT did not outperform RAU in reducing caregiving stress, but caregivers receiving iPCIT, relative to RAU, showed steeper increases in proportion of observed positive parenting skills (postintervention odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.53-2.21; 6-month OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.61-2.55; 12-month OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.70-3.07) and sharper decreases in proportion of observed controlling/critical behaviors (postintervention OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.61-1.52; 6-month OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.58-1.46; 12-month OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 0.53-1.37). After treatment, iPCIT caregivers also self-reported steeper decreases in harsh and inconsistent discipline than did than RAU caregivers (postintervention Cohen d = 0.24; 6-month Cohen d = 0.26; 12-month Cohen d = 0.27). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial provide evidence that a telehealth-delivered parenting intervention with real-time therapist coaching led to significant and maintained improvements for young children with DD and their caregivers. Findings underscore the promise of telehealth formats for expanding scope and reach of care for underserved families. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03260816.

How Flexible are Treatments for Youth Internalizing Disorders? Examining Modification Guidelines Included across Supported Treatments.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment protocols for youth-internalizing disorders have been developed, however these protocols have yielded mixed findings in routine care settings. Despite increased recognition of the importance of flexibility when delivering evidence-based treatments (EBTs), little is known about the extent to which protocols offer guidance to providers in flexible EBT implementation. The current study examined the extent to which supported EBTs for youth internalizing disorders explicitly incorporate guidance for treatment modification. METHODS: Supported treatment protocols for youth internalizing disorders were identified (N = 44), from which 4,021 modification guidelines were extracted and coded using a structured coding system to classify modification strategies (i.e., the forms that recommended modifications take), and associated tailoring factors (i.e., the rationale for which modifications are recommended). RESULTS: Across all EBTs, modification guidelines were quite common, with the average protocol including almost 91 text passages providing guidance for modification. The majority of modification guidelines functionally increase session or treatment length by recommending the addition or repetition of material, whereas less than 5% of modification guidelines provided strategies for condensing or streamlining care. Strikingly, less than 2% of modification guidelines in EBT protocols address patient cultural factors, and rarely address provider or setting issues that can challenge standard implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight critical gaps in the available guidance to modify EBTs for youth internalizing disorders, and suggest EBT protocols may not be optimally poised to flexibly address the broad diversity of children and adolescents across varied settings in need of mental health care.