CAPN1 and hereditary spastic paraplegia: a novel variant in an Iranian family and overview of the genotype-phenotype correlation.

PURPOSE: SPG76 is one of the rare forms of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) which causes by mutations in the CAPN1 gene. The mode of inheritance of SPG76 is autosomal recessive (AR) and so far, only 24 families and 25 mutations in this gene have been reported worldwide. These mutations have been associated with a spectrum of disorders from pure HSP to spastic ataxia. HSP genetically is one of the most heterogeneous neurological disorders and to date, 79 types of HSP (SPG1-SPG79) have been identified, however, it has been suggested that many HSP-genes, particularly in AR-HSPs, remained unknown. AR-HSPs clinically overlap with other neurodegenerative disorders, making an accurate diagnosis of the disease difficult. Therefore, in addition to clinical examination, a high throughout genetic method like whole exome sequencing (WES) may be necessary for the diagnosis of this type of neurodegenerative disorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: Herein, we present the clinical features and results of WES in the first Iranian family with a novel CAPN1 variant, c.C853T:p.R285* and pure HSP. CONCLUSION: Some of the previous studies have mentioned that the "spasticity-ataxia phenotype might be conducted to the diagnosis of SPG76" but recently the number of pure HSP patients with CAPN1 mutation is increasing. The present study also expands the mutation spectrum of pure CAPN1-related SPG76; emphasizing that CAPN1 screening is required in both pure HSP and spasticity-ataxia phenotypes. As noted in some other literature, we suggest the clinical spectrum of this disorder to be considered as "CAPN1-associated neurodegeneration".

Description of combined ARHSP/JALS phenotype in some patients with SPG11 mutations.

BACKGROUND: SPG11 mutations can cause autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia (ARHSP) and juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (JALS). Because these diseases share some clinical presentations and both can be caused by SPG11 mutations, it was considered that definitive diagnosis may not be straight forward. METHODS: The DNAs of referred ARHSP and JALS patients were exome sequenced. Clinical data of patients with SPG11 mutations were gathered by interviews and neurological examinations including electrodiagnosis (EDX) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Eight probands with SPG11 mutations were identified. Two mutations are novel. Among seven Iranian probands, six carried the p.Glu1026Argfs*4-causing mutation. All eight patients had features known to be present in both ARHSP and JALS. Additionally and surprisingly, presence of both thin corpus callosum (TCC) on MRI and motor neuronopathy were also observed in seven patients. These presentations are, respectively, key suggestive features of ARHSP and JALS. CONCLUSION: We suggest that rather than ARHSP or JALS, combined ARHSP/JALS is the appropriate description of seven patients studied. Criteria for ARHSP, JALS, and combined ARHSP/JALS designations among patients with SPG11 mutations are suggested. The importance of performing both EDX and MRI is emphasized. Initial screening for p.Glu1026Argfs*4 may facilitate SPG11 screenings in Iranian patients.