Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(4): ofac075, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35308484

ABSTRACT

Background: Adult vaccination programs are suboptimal. Methods: Pneumococcal vaccination history, and healthcare contact were assessed in patients with invasive pneumococcal disease. Results: Of the 229 cases, 14% were vaccinated. Observed mortality was 20.1%. Conclusions: Numerous missed vaccination opportunities were identified.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 55: 76-81, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35287091

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the combination of intramuscular (IM) droperidol/midazolam to haloperidol/lorazepam regarding time to sedation in patients with acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a prospective, unblinded observational study in the ED of a university teaching hospital. Subjects with acute undifferentiated agitation refractory to verbal de-escalation were assigned to receive a combination of either haloperidol 5 mg/lorazepam 2 mg or droperidol 5 mg/midazolam 5 mg IM. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients adequately sedated at 10 min defined as ED Sedation Assessment Tool (SAT) score of 0 or less. Secondary outcomes included change in ED SAT score at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min, the need for oxygen supplementation, and the need for airway intervention. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled in the study, with 43 patients receiving droperidol/midazolam and 43 patients receiving haloperidol/lorazepam. Ten minutes after receiving medication, 51.2% of patients in the droperidol/midazolam group were adequately sedated compared to 7% of patients in the haloperidol/lorazepam group (OR: 14; 95% CI: 3.7, 52.1). Median time to adequate sedation was 10 min for the droperidol/midazolam group and 30 min for the haloperidol/lorazepam group. Eleven patients (25.6%) in the droperidol/midazolam group received oxygen supplementation compared to four patients (9.3%) in the haloperidol/lorazepam group. No study patients experienced extrapyramidal symptoms or required endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Intramuscular droperidol/midazolam was superior to intramuscular haloperidol/lorazepam in achieving adequate sedation at 10 min. Patients in the droperidol/midazolam arm may be more likely to receive oxygen supplementation than those in the haloperidol/lorazepam arm.


Subject(s)
Droperidol , Haloperidol , Lorazepam , Midazolam , Psychomotor Agitation , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Droperidol/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Humans , Lorazepam/therapeutic use , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...