Development and validation of the Sinonasal Endoscopic Score (SiNES) for chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Although there are several endoscopic grading systems for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), they are limited in their range and applicability. We developed a SiNonasal Endoscopic Score (SiNES) that builds upon the strengths of previous systems while addressing their limitations. METHODS: The SiNES system was developed by consensus after multiple rounds of guided discussions. Face, content, and convergent validity were investigated. It was validated using an independent sample of 79 CRS individuals from two referral centres from September 2021 to February 2022. Each patient underwent a sinonasal endoscopy and filled PROM questionnaires. Three independent rhinologists graded endoscopic videos using the SiNES and modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK) scores. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). SiNES and MLK scores were correlated with PROMs using a Spearman correlation and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). RESULTS: The SiNES system evaluates five anatomical spaces regarding edema, discharge, and scarring. Face, content, and convergent validity were deemed satisfactory by the study authors and an independent panel of Otolaryngologists. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for the SiNES and good for the MLK score. Test-retest reliability was excellent for both systems. Total SiNES was correlated with self-reported smell loss. CONCLUSIONS: The SiNES system is an accurate and reliable grading framework applicable to all CRS subtypes. It can be utilized in clinical and research settings and improves upon previously published systems.

Squeeze bottle versus saline spray after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a pilot multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for controlled trials to guide the perioperative management of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The authors performed a pilot multicenter trial to compare two types of saline delivery devices in this population. METHODS: Patients were randomized to high volume saline irrigation with a squeeze bottle and low volume saline spray after ESS in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Surgeons were blinded to treatment, and one-month postoperative scores for sinonasal outcomes [Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22)] scale, nasal and sinus symptom score (NSS), and perioperative sinus endoscopy (POSE) scale were compared with preoperative scores. RESULTS: Nine centers provided data for 86 patients. All three outcomes measures improved significantly for both groups. Saline spray: SNOT-22 48.8 versus. 23.7, treatment effect 25.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9-32.2), POSE 21.1 versus. 8.4, treatment effect 12.7 (95% CI, 9.2-16.1), and NSS 8.2 versus 5.0, treatment effect 3.1 (95% CI, 1.4-4.9) pre- and postoperatively, respectively (all p < 0.0001). Squeeze bottle: SNOT-22 49.5 versus 23.6, treatment effect 25.9 (95% CI, 20.3-31.6), POSE 18.6 versus 9.2, treatment effect 9.3, (95% CI 6.7-12.0), and NSS 9.0 versus 5.7, treatment effect 3.3 (95% CI, 2.3-4.3) pre- and postoperatively, respectively (all p < 0.0001). Analysis of variance did not identify a difference between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analysis based on preoperative disease severity did not change the nonassociation of saline bottle with outcome measures. Post hoc sample size calculation determined that 176 patients is required to detect an 8.9-point difference in SNOT-22 scores. CONCLUSION: In this pilot multicenter trial examining patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing ESS, both squeeze bottle and saline spray showed significant improvement in SNOT-22, POSE, and NSS scores at one-month postoperatively. Because the study was nonpowered, we cannot rule out a potential difference between the two treatment groups.

Computer or not? Use of image guidance during endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis at St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The advantages and limitations of image guidance systems for endoscopic sinus surgery are unclear. We report our experience and present a meta-analysis of the evidence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery procedures performed with versus without image guidance. A total of 355 cases was included. Primary outcomes included complication rates and time to revision surgery. A literature search was conducted to enable identification and analysis of studies of similar comparisons. RESULTS: Within 1.5 years of the index sinus surgical procedure, the risk of revision surgery was significantly higher for patients treated with non-assisted versus computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery (p = 0.001). Meta-analysis did not indicate a reduction in complications or revision surgery procedures with the use of image guidance systems, although the majority of included studies showed a non-significant reduction in revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study offers some evidence that computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery may delay residual disease and reduce the requirement for revision surgery. Although this finding was not borne out in the meta-analysis, the majority of identified studies demonstrated a trend towards fewer revision procedures after computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. This type of surgery may offer other advantages that are not easily measurable.

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of gloved versus ungloved merocel middle meatal spacers for endoscopic sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Middle meatal spacers are commonly used following endoscopic sinus surgery to prevent post-operative bleeding and lateralization of the middle turbinates. The effects of nasal packing on post-operative sinonasal mucosal healing remain unknown in humans. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the histopathalogical effects of Merocel and Merocel covered with a finger glove on mucosal healing, and patients` discomfort immediately post-operatively after endoscopic sinus surgery and at removal of the nasal packing. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery were enrolled in a prospective study. Patients were randomized and blinded to receive Merocel middle meatal spacer (MMMS) in one nostril and finger glove Merocel middle meatal spacer (FGMMS) in the contra lateral side. Patients were seen on post-operative day 6, and completed a visual analogue score reporting the post-operative discomfort from nasal packing on each side. Following the removal of nasal packing, patients indicated which side caused more discomfort on removal. Biopsies were taken from the middle turbinates and sent to a blinded pathologist who scored the level of mucosal inflammation from 0 - 4. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between MMMS and FGMMS in regards to their effect on sinonasal mucosal inflammation and discomfort post-operatively. A statistically significant difference was noted with respect to discomfort at removal with the uncovered Merocel more likely to cause discomfort when compared to the Merocel covered in a glove finger. CONCLUSION: MMMS and FGMMS are equivalent in the amount of sinonasal mucosal inflammation and discomfort post endoscopic sinus surgery. However, the main advantage of the FGMMS was a significant reduction in pain on removal when compared with the MMMS.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis - a new staging system.

BACKGROUND: The existing Kupferberg post-operative endoscopic staging system for allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) has 4 stages (0-3) based on the `global` appearance of one side of the nose. Patients may however show visual improvement and yet remain at the same stage due to persistence in one sinus cavity, thus making the staging system ineffective. The aim of this study was to validate a new system that allows greater sensitivity in characterising the inflammation seen endoscopically. METHODOLOGY: A series of endoscopy videos of 50 patients with AFRS were retrospectively staged using a new ten-grade system, scoring each sinus cavity (maxillary, ethmoid, frontal and sphenoid) from 0-9 for increasing mucosal oedema and 1 point for the presence of fungal mucin giving a maximum score of 40 for each side of the nose. To assess reliability, 4 independent rhinologists were also asked to score the videos using the new system. RESULTS: A greater variety in the spectrum of mucosal disease was demonstrated with the new system allowing for a more descriptive analysis of its severity and its response, or lack of, to treatment. The inter-class correlation between the 6 total observers was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.92). CONCLUSION: Use of the new staging system provides a more sensitive tool for following patients` progress post-operatively in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and in determining their response to treatment.

Tumefactive fibroinflammatory lesion of the frontal sinus.

OBJECTIVE: A 65-year-old man presented with a nine-month history of swelling in the midline of the forehead. After surgical intervention, this lesion was found to be a tumefactive fibroinflammatory lesion of the frontal sinus. This case report and review aims to report this new location for tumefactive fibroinflammatory lesion, and to discuss whether, in retrospect, there would have been alternative options to surgery. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: Tumefactive fibroinflammatory lesions are rare. Although cases in the sinonasal tract have been described, none involving the frontal sinus have previously been reported. A review of the literature suggests that these lesions have an association with other fibroinflammatory lesions, and may be amenable to systemic steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: Each case should be managed on its merits, and a biopsy taken followed by subsequent screening for associated fibroinflammatory lesions. In the case of an isolated lesion, a surgical approach is probably favoured in a patient suitable for general anaesthesia.

Primary endoscopic management of the frontal sinus.

Surgical treatment of the frontal sinus continues to be an area of much interest and controversy. The complex anatomy and confined space of this region require the endoscopic surgeon to be knowledgeable and delicate to obtain a positive result. Proper instrumentation is crucial and continues to evolve over time. Postoperative endoscopic care is integral to the success of endoscopic frontal sinusotomy and the availability of proper office equipment to perform this care is critical. In most instances, the intranasal endoscopic approach can be accomplished successfully without the need for an external procedure.

Revision endoscopic frontal sinusotomy with mucoperiosteal flap advancement: the frontal sinus rescue procedure.

Frontal sinusitis after middle turbinate resection occurs because of stenosis of the frontal ostium by soft tissue scarring or residual bony fragments (which are pulled to the medial orbital wall by scar contracture). Standard endoscopic techniques cannot address this problem; however, revision endoscopic frontal sinusotomy with mucoperiosteal flap advancement (the frontal sinus rescue procedure) relieves this bony stenosis and incorporates a mucosal flap that minimizes postoperative stenosis.

The frontal sinus unobliteration procedure.

Although intranasal frontal sinusotomy can now be performed for most cases of chronic frontal sinusitis, the osteoplastic frontal sinus procedure with obliteration, unfortunately, still is considered by many to be the standard for chronic frontal sinusitis against that which other frontal sinus procedures are judged. Unobliterating the previously obliterated sinus is indicated for patients with evidence of frontal sinus pathology on CT or MR images and for patients with chronic symptoms with equivocal radiologic results. The reopened frontal sinus can be reventilated and remucosalized, or reobliterated with the placement of a new fat graft. Complete or partial auto-obliteration by new bone formation or fibrosis is another possible endpoint that can result when unobliteration is attempted.

The frontal sinus rescue procedure: early experience and three-year follow-up.

The frontal sinus rescue (FSR), first described in 1997, has now been performed on 24 patients (32 sides) over a period of three years. It is a functional endoscopic surgical approach to correct an iatrogenically scarred and obstructed frontal recess, which cannot be successfully opened via a normal endoscopic frontal sinusotomy approach. It is utilized primarily for patients whose only remaining option is either a Draf-type drill-out (modified intranasal Lothrop) procedure or frontal sinus obliteration. The FSR is a technically challenging procedure, but faster, less difficult, and less destructive for the patient than a "drill-out" or frontal sinus obliteration. Once learned, it can save the patient from undergoing the more radical drill-out or obliterative procedure. The early experience and three-year follow-up with this new endoscopic procedure is presented in our first 24 patients (32 sides).

Allergic fungal sinusitis: a four-year follow-up.

Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), first described over 18 years ago and subsequently identified using established criteria, remains a challenge to treat. Our protocol has included complete functional endoscopic sinus surgery to remove the fungal load and restore physiologic mucous clearance. The patient is treated with prednisone for several months and followed monthly with total serum IgE levels and an established endoscopic mucosal staging system. A group of 11 patients first treated in 1994 and presented at the 1995 American Rhinology Society Spring meeting are being presented again to provide an update on their progress over the past four years. A great deal of experience has been gained from their treatment and has continued to modify our postoperative medical management. An overview of AFS, our evolving and current treatment protocol, and possible future trends are discussed in this paper.

The endoscopic management of chronic frontal sinusitis associated with frontal sinus posterior table erosion.

Expansile inflammatory diseases of the frontal sinuses may produce erosion of the posterior table of the frontal sinus. In these instances, the bone between sinus mucosa and intracranial dura is absent. Over the past decade, endoscopic frontal sinusotomy has emerged as the preferred technique for the treatment of refractory chronic frontal sinusitis. Endoscopic approaches also have a role in the most advanced instances of frontal sinusitis. A retrospective chart review of patients who were treated for frontal sinusitis with erosion of the frontal sinus posterior table was performed. Eight patients were identified. All patients underwent endoscopic frontal sinusotomy; some patients required multiple endoscopic procedures. Complete frontal recess dissection with identification of the frontal ostium was achieved for all involved frontal sinuses. In all cases, this postoperative result was monitored by CT scans (where indicated) and serial nasal endoscopy, which demonstrated good frontal sinus aeration and normal mucociliary clearance. Antibiotics were administered for culture-documented bacterial exacerbations, and systemic steroids were given for management of allergic fungal sinusitis and sinonasal polyposis associated with asthma. No patient underwent frontal sinus obliteration or cranialization. No suppurative intracranial complications were noted during the postoperative period. Endoscopic frontal sinusotomy can be used safely for the definitive management of frontal sinusitis associated with posterior table erosion. In fact, endoscopic techniques may represent the preferred approach for the treatment of this problem. Such an approach avoids the morbidity of more destructive alternatives (such as obliteration), and serves to create a frontal sinus with normal mucociliary clearance.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: perioperative management, prevention of recurrence, and role of steroids and antifungal agents.

Allergic fungal sinusitis can best be thought of as chronic fungal affectation (not an infection) of the sinuses to which the body's immune system hyperreacts, thereby creating significant inflammation, edema, obstruction, and polyposis. Currently it is felt that allergic fungal sinusitis requires both surgical and medical management. The effectiveness and required duration of the various medical treatments remain unknown and are under active investigation. Both surgical intervention and the use of systemic steroids are recommended in the treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis. Experience with surgical and medical management, follow-up of patients, and proposed treatment protocols are discussed.

Geographic variation in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) has a worldwide distribution. This survey of 20 otolaryngologic practices throughout the United States confirmed a variation in the frequency of AFRS relative to endoscopic sinus procedures performed for all other diagnoses. The highest incidence occurred in Memphis, Tennessee at 23%, with three other southern practices reporting a frequency of at least 10%. In the northern locations the frequency ranged from 0 to 4%. No correlation with mould counts was demonstrated, possibly because of incomplete mould data relative to most of the surgical locations.

Stereotactic computer-assisted navigational sinus surgery: accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking system with the tissue debrider and when utilizing different headsets for the same patient.

The InstaTrak system by Visualization Technologies, Inc. (Woburn, MA) has recently introduced attachments that can be utilized to localize the tip of the XPS Straightshot debrider (Xomed Industries, Jacksonville, FL) during image-guided surgery. The accuracy of these newer attachments has not been objectively tested in a clinical setting. Our primary objective was to compare the actual instrument (XPS debrider tip) location with its computer screen location in the coronal, sagittal, and axial views. This was considered to be the "accuracy" of the instrument being tested. We secondarily compared its accuracy with the accuracy of the 0 degree and 45 degrees curved localizing aspirators in a prospective study. The manufacturer also recommends that the same headset used during scanning be utilized during surgery. A second objective therefore was to determine if a headset other than the one used during CT scanning could be used intraoperatively with an acceptable level of accuracy. Accuracy of the instruments between the patients' own headset (used during CT scanning) and a generic or research headset (not used during scanning) was compared intraoperatively. The third and final objective was to determine if the same headset could be used repeatedly with an acceptable level of accuracy. Generic "research" headsets were therefore utilized for a total of five surgeries per headset and visual accuracy between the multiply utilized research headsets and the patients' own headsets was recorded and compared. Anatomic localization accuracy was 1.06 mm for the XPS debrider, 0.89 mm for the 0 degree aspirator, and 1.05 mm for the 45 aspirator when the patients own headset was utilized. When the research (generic) headset was utilized the respective values were 0.69 mm for the debrider, 0.77 mm for the 0 degree aspirator, and 0.99 mm for the 45 degrees aspirator. With multiple utilization of a single headset, there was no significant loss in accuracy. In conclusion, the accuracy of the newly marketed attachment for the debrider was found to be comparable to the standard aspirators. Accuracy remained acceptable when a headset other than the one used during CT scanning was used intraoperatively. No loss in accuracy was noted when a headset was utilized more than once.

Efficacy of nuclear scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of sinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not nuclear scintigraphy is useful in the diagnosis and management of chronic sinusitis. The ideal isotope(s) and drawbacks of the different isotopes in different clinical situations are reviewed and discussed. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients undergoing nuclear medicine studies to aid in the diagnosis and management of sinus disease was carried out. METHOD: Ideal candidates were chosen from both previously operated and unoperated patients whose computed tomography (CT) scan findings could not differentiate benign mucosal thickening from active inflammation. Nuclear scintigraphy scans using indium (In-111), gallium (Ga-67), and technetium (Tch-99m) were used to differentiate acute infection from chronic inflammation involving bone (osteitis) and/or mucosa. This information was then used to guide the management of their condition. Nuclear scintigraphy results were compared to findings on CT scan and during surgery. RESULTS: In-111 was found to be the best isotope for identifying pus or acute disease in the sinuses whereas Ga-67 was very good for identifying both chronic mucosal disease as well as acute disease. Tch-99m was very sensitive for identifying bony remodelling and was therefore not found to be useful if the patient had undergone previous sinus surgery. CONCLUSION: Although not to be considered, in our view, a first-line diagnostic test, nuclear scintigraphy, is useful in cases where CT results are nondifferentiating.