Noncanonical matrix metalloprotease-1-protease-activated receptor-1 signaling triggers vascular smooth muscle cell dedifferentiation and arterial stenosis.

Vascular injury that results in proliferation and dedifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) is an important contributor to restenosis following percutaneous coronary interventions or plaque rupture. Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) has been shown to play a role in vascular repair processes; however, little is known regarding its function or the relative roles of the upstream proteases thrombin and matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1) in triggering PAR1-mediated arterial restenosis. The goal of this study was to determine whether noncanonical MMP-1 signaling through PAR1 would contribute to aberrant vascular repair processes in models of arterial injury. A mouse carotid arterial wire injury model was used for studies of neointima hyperplasia and arterial stenosis. The mice were treated post-injury for 21 days with a small molecule inhibitor of MMP-1 or a direct thrombin inhibitor and compared with vehicle control. Intimal and medial hyperplasia was significantly inhibited by 2.8-fold after daily treatment with the small molecule MMP-1 inhibitor, an effect that was lost in PAR1-deficient mice. Conversely, chronic inhibition of thrombin showed no benefit in suppressing the development of arterial stenosis. Thrombin-PAR1 signaling resulted in a supercontractile, differentiated phenotype in SMCs. Noncanonical MMP-1-PAR1 signaling resulted in the opposite effect and led to a dedifferentiated phenotype via a different G protein pathway. MMP-1-PAR1 significantly stimulated hyperplasia and migration of SMCs, and resulted in down-regulation of SMC contractile genes. These studies provide a new mechanism for the development of vascular intimal hyperplasia and suggest a novel therapeutic strategy to suppress restenosis by targeting noncanonical MMP-1-PAR1 signaling in vascular SMCs.

Hiccups as a presenting symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal disease increasingly recognized in adults for its gastrointestinal manifestations. This paper discusses a young woman with EoE who presented with persistent hiccups and intermittent dyspepsia. The patient was initially treated with trials of both H(2) blocker and proton pump inhibitor. However, her hiccups resolved only after treatment with topical fluticasone. A repeat upper endoscopy while on steroid treatment demonstrated both histologic remission of EoE and resolution of esophageal trachealization. Our patient's clinical course supports an association between hiccups and EoE, suggesting that EoE be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with refractory hiccups.

Dopamine receptor mechanism(s) and antinociception and tolerance induced by swim stress in formalin test.

In the present study, involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the antinociception and tolerance induced by water swim stress in the formalin test has been investigated. Water swim stress at 20 degrees C temperature induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test. Intraperitoneal administration of the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, sulpiride (25 and 50 mg/kg) reduced swim stress-induced antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test. A higher dose of the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) also reduced swim stress-induced antinociception in both phases of the test. Exposure to 3 min water swimming stress, once daily for 3 days, induced tolerance to swim stress-induced antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test. Administration of sulpiride (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg), during exposure to water swimming stress (once daily for 3 days), decreased tolerance in the second phase, whereas the antagonist (12.5 and 50 mg/kg) increased pain scores in the first phase of the formalin test. Sulpiride (25 mg/kg) treatment however, once daily for 3 days with no water swimming stress, did not alter swim stress-induced antinociception (0.5, 1 and 3 min tests). Similarly, repeated treatment with SCH23390 (0.05 mg/kg) and water swimming stress did not alter tolerance induced by water swimming stress. Repeated administration of the antagonist in the absence of water swimming stress also did not change swim stress-induced antinociception. The results may indicate a possible involvement of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the antinociception induced by swim stress and D2 receptor mechanism in the tolerance induced by repeated swim stress.