Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
ESMO Open ; 7(1): 100314, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34922298

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who progress on first-line therapy have limited treatment options. The TreeTopp study assessed varlitinib, a reversible small molecule pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, plus capecitabine in previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study enrolled patients with confirmed unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer and disease progression after one prior line of gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy. Patients received oral varlitinib 300 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.) for 21 days, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14, in 21-day treatment cycles. Co-primary endpoints were objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1 by Independent Central Review. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients received varlitinib plus capecitabine (n = 64) or placebo plus capecitabine (n = 63). The objective response rate was 9.4% with varlitinib plus capecitabine versus 4.8% with capecitabine alone (odds ratio 2.28; P = 0.42). Median PFS was 2.83 versus 2.79 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-1.37; P = 0.63] and overall survival was 7.8 versus 7.5 months (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.79; P = 0.66), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, the addition of varlitinib appeared to provide a PFS benefit in female patients (median, 4.1 versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.23) and those with gallbladder cancer (median, 2.9 versus 1.6 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26-1.19). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 65.6% of patients receiving varlitinib plus capecitabine versus 58.7% of those receiving capecitabine alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, second-line treatment with varlitinib plus capecitabine was well tolerated but did not improve efficacy versus capecitabine alone. A PFS benefit was suggested in female patients and those with gallbladder cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Biliary Tract Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/drug therapy , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine/pharmacology , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Progression-Free Survival
2.
Invest New Drugs ; 36(6): 1037-1043, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29785570

ABSTRACT

Background The MAPK pathway plays a central role in regulation of several cellular processes, and its dysregulation is a hallmark of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Binimetinib (MEK162), a potent, selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with advanced BTC. Patients and Methods An expansion cohort study in patients who received ≤1 line of therapy for advanced BTC was conducted after determination of the maximum tolerated dose in this Phase 1 trial. Patients received binimetinib 60 mg twice daily. The primary objectives were to characterize the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of binimetinib in advanced BTC. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical efficacy, changes in weight and lean body mass, and pharmacodynamic effects. Tumor samples were assessed for mutations in relevant genes. Results Twenty-eight patients received binimetinib. Common adverse events (AEs) were mild, with rash (82%) and nausea (54%) being most common. Two patients experienced grade 4 AEs, one generalized edema and the other pulmonary embolism. The pharmacokinetics in this patient population were consistent with those previously reported (Bendell JC et al., Br J Cancer 2017;116:575-583). Twelve patients (43%) experienced stable disease and two had objective responses (1 complete response, 1 partial response) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and stable metabolic disease by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Most patients (18/25; 72%) did not have KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3KCA, or PTEN mutations, nor was there correlation between mutation status and response. The average non-fluid weight gain was 1.3% for lean muscle and 4.7% for adipose tissue. Conclusion Binimetinib was well tolerated and showed promising evidence of activity in patients with BTC. Correlative studies suggested the potential for binimetinib to promote muscle gain in patients with BTC.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/drug therapy , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscles/drug effects , Muscles/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Organ Size/drug effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Subcutaneous Fat/drug effects , Subcutaneous Fat/pathology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 14(12): 3527-33, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17879119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: EMT or transformation to the mesenchymal phenotype plays an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis. In vitro data suggest that mesenchymal transformation may correlate with the activation of PI3 kinase and Ras/Erk pathways. We investigated the expression of EMT markers (low E-cadherin, high fibronectin, and vimentin) and their association with p-Erk in resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Clinical data/surgical specimens from 34 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients (pts) who underwent pancreatectomy were included. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues using monoclonal antibodies against vimentin, fibronectin, E-cadherin, and p-Erk. The results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival. Survival analysis (log-rank test, Cox proportional hazard model), categorical data analysis (Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact test) and Kendall's tau were performed at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The patient population was formed from 13 males and 21 females, with a median age of 66 years (range 38-84 years); American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 1 (n = 2), 2 (n = 27), 3 (n = 5); histological grade 1 (n = 4), 2 (n = 13), 3 (n = 16), 4 (n = 1). Median survival was 15 months (95% CI: 11-24 months). Fibronectin overexpression correlated with the presence of vimentin (p = 0.0048) and activated Erk (p = 0.0264). There was a borderline association of fibronectin with worsening grade (p = 0.06). A negative association between vimentin and E-cadherin was noted (p = 0.0024). Increased fibronectin or vimentin and decreased E-cadherin correlated with poor survival. CONCLUSION: EMT is associated with poor survival in surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A correlation between activated Erk and fibronectin was identified that may open avenues for targeted therapy for this subgroup.


Subject(s)
Epithelium/pathology , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/metabolism , Mesoderm/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/enzymology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/enzymology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cadherins/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/enzymology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Enzyme Activation , Epithelium/metabolism , Female , Fibronectins/metabolism , Humans , Male , Mesoderm/metabolism , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Phosphorylation , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Vimentin/metabolism
4.
Oncology ; 73(5-6): 281-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18477853

ABSTRACT

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the fastest growing malignancies in the US. The long-term survival of patients with this cancer remains poor; only 25% of patients undergoing surgical excision are alive after 5 years. Multimodal programs that incorporate radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery for localized tumors may result in a modest survival advantage. However, significant strides in this disease can result from the inclusion of targeted therapies. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family represents one such target and is receiving increasing attention due to the advent of specific inhibitors. Studies conducted by us and others have shown that the overexpression of EGFR family signaling intermediates is common in Barrett's esophagus and EAC. In the latter case, EGFR expression may have prognostic significance. EGFR inhibitors, including oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, result in a synergistic antitumor effect with chemotherapeutic agents or with radiotherapy. Therefore, several ongoing studies include EGFR-directed therapy either alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy for this disease. Our study of gefitinib, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy suggested that gefitinib can be safely incorporated into an oxaliplatin-based chemoradiation program for esophageal cancer, although the clinical activity of this combination is modest. Herein, we review the current literature on this subject.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Gefitinib , Humans , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Survival Analysis
5.
J Chemother ; 18(5): 514-24, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17127229

ABSTRACT

With a goal of identifying relations between gene expression and response (mucosal or pathological) or survival in esophageal cancer patients (stages II to IV) receiving oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and radiation, we measured in endoscopic primary tumor biopsies from 38 patients, the expression of seven genes (gammaGCS, gammaGT, MRP-2, ERCC-1, XPA, TS and DPD) prior to treatment, 1 week following oxaliplatin alone and at the end of the combined radio-chemotherapy cycle using real time QRT-PCR. A higher pretreatment level of XPA was related to shorter survival with a hazard ratio of 2.43 (90% confidence interval 1.09 to 5.43) using Cox regression modeling. However, multivariate analysis with a Cox model indicated low expression of XPA or TS and combined stages II and III had a higher probability of survival (for XPA: hazard ratio 3.0 and 90% C.I. of 1.3 to 6.9, with adjustment for stage included; for TS: hazard ratio is 1.98 with 90% C.I. of 0.94 to 4.20. The expression of TS, gammaGCS, ERCC-1 and MRP-2 declined from D 1 to the end of the cycle (p<0.05, sign test). A validation and further understanding of the findings need to be carried out in a larger study with a more homogeneous population of patients.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biopsy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Gene Expression/drug effects , Humans , Laryngeal Mucosa/drug effects , Laryngeal Mucosa/metabolism , Male , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2 , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Radiation Dosage , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
6.
Dis Esophagus ; 19(2): 78-83, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16643174

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic options for locoregional esophageal cancer (EC) include primary surgery, neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiation and systemic chemotherapy. The role of surgery in these multimodal strategies has recently been debated and definitive chemoradiation is being offered as an alternative to surgery at many centers. We examined our results with multimodal therapy and surgery in this patient population. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 172 patients with locoregional (AJCC stages I-III) EC treated at RPCI between February 14, 1990 and September 20, 2002. Median age was 65 years (range, 36-95); there were 136 male patients. There were 100 regional (stages IIB-III), 69 local (stages I-IIA) and three in situ cases. Initial therapy was either combined modality (n = 122) or single modality (surgery) (n = 50). There was 0%, 30-day, postoperative mortality. Median survival for all patients was 25.3 months and was better for local stage with surgery alone (75 months) than with neoadjuvant (35.7 months) or definitive chemoradiation (19.1 months, P < 0.001). Survival for patients with regional disease treated with surgery alone, neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiation was 21.5, 24.4 and 11.8 months, respectively (P = not significant). The associations of prognostic factors with overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and 2-sided Wald's chi-square test. On multivariate analysis, carefully selected patients treated with surgery alone had better outcomes compared with those treated with definitive chemoradiation (P < 0.001). Patients with locoregional esophageal cancer who are eligible for surgical resection either alone or as a part of multimodal therapy may have better outcomes than those treated with non-surgical approaches.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
7.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 56(5): 447-54, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15947933

ABSTRACT

Two studies of irinotecan (CPT-11) followed 24 h later by an antimetabolite were conducted. The objectives of the studies were: (1) to determine whether the increase in S-phase in tumor cells seen 24 h after CPT-11 administration in animal studies is seen in advanced solid tumors in patients, (2) to determine the dose of CPT-11 required to produce this effect, (3) to compare two methods (immunohistochemistry, IHC, for cyclin A, and DNA flow cytometry, FC) for evaluating S-phase in tumor biopsies from patients, and (4) to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of CPT-11, given 24 h before gemcitabine (GEM, 1000 mg/m(2)). In one study CPT-11 was followed 24 h later by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 400 mg/m(2) per week for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Tumor biopsies were obtained before and 24 h after CPT-11 administration before administration of 5-FU and assayed for S-phase by IHC for cyclin A and by FC. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 80 mg/m(2) per week with subsequent exploration of 40 and 60 mg/m(2) per week to establish the dose-effect relationship of the increase in tumor cells in S-phase. In the second study, CPT-11 was given 24 h before GEM 1000 mg/m(2) per week for 2 weeks every 3 weeks. Doses of 20-80 mg/m(2) were explored to establish the MTD and DLT and to study tumor cell S-phase in selected patients. CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) produced a mean increase in S-phase by IHC for cyclin A of 137%. Lesser increases were seen with 40 and 60 mg/m(2). CPT-11 followed 24 h later by 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) per week for 4 weeks was well tolerated. In the study of CPT-11 followed by GEM 1000 mg/m(2), 60 mg/m(2) of CPT-11 was the MTD.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/drug therapy , S Phase/drug effects , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacokinetics , Biopsy , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/pharmacokinetics , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Cyclin A/analysis , Cyclin A/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacokinetics , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/pharmacokinetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/pathology , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...