Assessment of distance from skin surface to muscle for evaluation of the risk of inadvertent intramuscular insulin injection at potential injection sites among patients attending a tertiary care children's hospital in Sri Lanka-an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy is essential for type 1 diabetes. While a reasonable glycemic control prevents complications, inadvertent intramuscular (IM) insulin injection results in hypoglycemia and fluctuations of blood glucose levels. OBJECTIVE: To assess the subcutaneous thickness (SCt) at the potential insulin injection sites, in order to determine the suitable needle length. METHODS: Diabetic and non-diabetic children (n=125; aged 2-14 years) attending a tertiary care hospital were examined, after excluding those who had skin abnormality at the injection site, were hospitalized for>3 days, or had any other chronic illnesses. Dermal thickness (Dt) and SCt at the potential insulin injection sites were measured with ultrasonography. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 8 years and 57% were boys; mean Dt was 2.1±0.4 mm, SCt was 7.45.6±3.7 mm, and maximum SCt was 29.8 mm in the anterior abdominal wall. SCt increased with age and by raising a skin fold (sf). There was no difference (P>0.05) in Dt between genders, and limbs showed thinner Dt values than the abdomen. SCt changed with the injection site: it was the lowest in the thigh and the highest in the abdomen. SCt was thicker in females, with or without sf (P<0.001). For all sites, IM risk was high for 15-mm needles: it was highest in the thighs (98%) and reduced to 86% with sf. IM risk was low for 5-mm needles: it was highest in the thigh (38%), and reduced to 12% with sf. Compared with girls (up to 42%), IM risk was higher for boys (up to 54%), even for 5-mm needles with a sf. CONCLUSION: Using a short needle is recommended for children, particularly for boys. Regardless of the needle length, the raised sf technique is associated with reduced IM risk.

Knowledge and perceptions about diet and physical activity among Sri Lankan adults with diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a rapidly growing health concern in Sri Lanka. Diet and physical activity are important modifiable risk factors affecting the incidence, severity and management of DM. The present study aims to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions about dietary patterns and physical activity among a group of adults with DM in Sri Lanka using qualitative research methods. METHODS: Fifty adults from a cohort of diabetic patients attending the medical clinics at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka were invited for the study. Data were collected via 10 Focus Group Discussions. Verbatim recording and documenting emotional responses were conducted by two independent observers. Directed content analysis of qualitative data was done with the help of NVIVO v10.0. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.2 ± 9.9 years and 46 % were males. Mean duration of diabetes was 10.4 ± 7.5 years. All were aware of the importance of diet in the management of DM. But most had difficulty in incorporating this knowledge into their lives mostly due to social circumstances. The majority described a list of 'good foods' and 'bad foods' for DM. They believed that 'good' foods can be consumed at all times, irrespective of quantity and 'bad' foods should be completely avoided. Many believed that fruits were bad for diabetes, while vegetables were considered as a healthy food choice. The majority thought that there were 'special' foods that help to control blood glucose, the most common being curry leaves and bitter-gourd. Most study participants were aware of the importance of being physical active. However, there was lack of consensus and clarity with regards to type, duration, timing and frequency of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite understanding the importance of dietary control and physical activity in the management of diabetes, adherence to practices were poor, mainly due to lack of clarity of information provided. There were many myths with regards to diet, some of which have originated from health care professionals. More evidence is needed to support or refute the claims about 'special' foods that the participants believe as being good for diabetes.