Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(4): 311-320, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35303783

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic nausea and vomiting (CNV) are commonly encountered symptoms in medical practice. CNV is the presenting symptom in a variety of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal disorders. However, in a significant percentage of patients without an obvious underlying cause, CNV poses a significant diagnostic challenge to the evaluating physician. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive clinical history and physical examination form the foundation for further diagnostic work-up. In the present review, we discuss the diagnostic approach to CNV, highlighting the epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, and modes of evaluation of this condition. Specific investigations, carefully guided by clinical assessment and tailored for each patient, would be more beneficial in diagnosing CNV than empirically performing a blanket of investigations. EXPERT OPINION: Whilst CNV remains a historically challenging diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, research into this topic is limited. Hence, there is a growing call for more research into diagnostic modalities for CNV. With scientific advancement and further research, it is hoped that easy-to-use, cheap, noninvasive novel diagnostic modalities for CNV will be available soon.


Subject(s)
Gastric Emptying , Nausea , Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans , Nausea/epidemiology , Nausea/etiology , Vomiting/epidemiology , Vomiting/etiology
2.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(12): 1349-1359, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34821190

ABSTRACT

Endoscopists are at high risk of exposure and nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 virus) when performing endoscopic procedures due to the highly aerosol generating nature of these procedures. At present, there is still no consensus among endoscopists with regards to the type of protective equipment to be worn by healthcare workers, when performing endoscopy during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review encompasses a summary of currently published guidelines related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. With increasing calls to rationalize the use of PPE due to shortages in global supply chains, the review offers a concise summary on the most appropriate and adequate use of PPE when performing endoscopy during the pandemic. It is expected that these adaptations in the use of PPE during the pandemic will help to improve standards of care and safety of healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 23(5): 389-95, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21448069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma are more common with increasing age and among men. Symptoms of gastrooesophageal reflux disease are equally common in both sexes and at all ages. We hypothesized that reduced postmenopausal female sex hormone levels may remove protection from acid reflux injury, leading to increased oesophagitis and its complications in older women. AIM: To examine the incidence of gastrooesophageal reflux disease and its complications in men and women in a large endoscopy database. METHODS: Anonymized data were extracted from endoscopy databases covering an 11-year period. Patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis (RO), BO, hiatus hernia and benign oesophageal stricture and total number and indications for endoscopies were identified. RESULTS: Out of 154 406 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies, 24 240 (15.7%) patients had RO {13,148 male, 11,092 female, mean age 59 [standard deviation (SD) 17] years}. The incidence of RO increased with age {odds ratio 1.029 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.026-1.032], P<0.001} but this increase was more marked in women with increasing age [1.01 (1.01-1.02), P<0.001] compared with men. Increasing age was associated with an increased incidence of benign oesophageal stricture [1.02 (1.017-1.023)] and BO [1.02 (1.019-1.021)]. Although the increase in benign oesophageal stricture was more marked in women [1.024 (1.02-1.028) P<0.001] than in men, this was not the case in BO. CONCLUSION: RO and its complications, BO and benign oesophageal stricture increase with age. RO, BO and stricture are more common in absolute and relative terms among younger men than younger women. RO and stricture increase more rapidly in women than men so that the prevalence in elderly patients is similar in both sexes.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Hernia, Hiatal/diagnosis , Hernia, Hiatal/epidemiology , Hernia, Hiatal/pathology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...