Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 728: 48-58, 2014 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24512725

ABSTRACT

Nicotine sensory perception is generally thought to be mediated by nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors. However, recent data strongly support the idea that other receptors (e.g., transient receptor potential A1 channel, TRPA1) and other pathways contribute to the detection mechanisms underlying the olfactory and trigeminal cell response to nicotine flavor. This is in accordance with the reported ability of humans to discriminate between (+)- and (-)- nicotine enantiomers. To get a more detailed understanding of the molecular and cellular basis underlying the sensory perception of nicotine, we studied the activity of (+)- and (-)-nicotine on cultured murine trigeminal sensory neurons and on a range of heterologously expressed receptors. The human TRPA1 channel is activated by (-)-nicotine. In this work, we show that (+)-nicotine is also an activator of this channel. Pharmacological experiments using nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and transient receptor potential blockers revealed that trigeminal neurons express one or more unidentified receptors that are sensitive to (+)- and/or (-)-nicotine. Results also indicate that the presence of extracellular calcium ions is required to elicit trigeminal neuron responses to (+)- and (-)-nicotine. Results also show that both (+)-nicotine and (-)-nicotine can block 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor-mediated responses in recombinant expression systems and in cultured trigeminal neurons expressing 5-HT3 receptors. Our investigations broaden the spectra of receptors that are targets for nicotine enantiomers and give new insights into the physiological role of nicotine.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/pharmacology , Sensory Receptor Cells/drug effects , Transient Receptor Potential Channels/metabolism , Trigeminal Ganglion/drug effects , Animals , Calcium/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Membrane Potentials/drug effects , Mice , Nicotine/chemistry , Oocytes/metabolism , Patch-Clamp Techniques , Primary Cell Culture , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Nicotinic/metabolism , Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3/metabolism , Sensory Receptor Cells/metabolism , Stereoisomerism , Structure-Activity Relationship , TRPA1 Cation Channel , Transient Receptor Potential Channels/genetics , Trigeminal Ganglion/cytology , Trigeminal Ganglion/metabolism , Xenopus laevis
2.
Transgenic Res ; 14(6): 807-16, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16315088

ABSTRACT

The current discussion on the safety of transgenic crops includes their effects on beneficial insects, such as parasitoids and predators of pest insects. One important plant trait to consider in this context is the emission of volatiles in response to herbivory. Natural enemies use the odours that result from these emissions as cues to locate their herbivorous prey and any significant change in these plant-provided signals may disrupt their search efficiency. There is a need for practical and reliable methods to evaluate transgenic crops for this and other important plant traits. Moreover, it is imperative that such evaluations are done in the context of variability for these traits among conventional genotypes of a crop. For maize and the induction of volatile emissions by caterpillar feeding this variability is known and realistic comparisons can therefore be made. Here we used a six-arm olfactometer that permits the simultaneous collection of volatiles emitted by multiple plants and testing of their attractiveness to insects. With this apparatus we measured the induced odour emissions of Bt maize (Bt11, N4640Bt) and its near-isogenic line (N4640) and the attractiveness of these odours to Cotesia marginiventris and Microplitis rufiventris, two important larval parasitoids of common lepidopteran pests. Both parasitoid species were strongly attracted to induced maize odour and neither wasp distinguished between the odours of the transgenic and the isogenic line. Also wasps that had previously experienced one of the odours during a successful oviposition divided their choices equally between the two odours. However, chemical analyses of collected odours revealed significant quantitative differences. The same 11 compounds dominated the blends of both genotypes, but the isogenic line released a larger amount of most of these. These differences may be due to altered resource allocation in the transgenic line, but it had no measurable effect on the wasps' behaviour. All compounds identified here had been previously reported for maize and the differential quantities in which they were released fall well within the range of variability observed for other maize genotypes.


Subject(s)
Bacillus thuringiensis/physiology , Hymenoptera/physiology , Odorants , Plants, Genetically Modified/metabolism , Zea mays/metabolism , Zea mays/microbiology , Animals , Chromatography, Gas , Genotype
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...