[Anatomical and functional results of macular hole surgery using a temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap. Experience with 24 cases]. / Résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels de la chirurgie du trou maculaire avec positionnement d'un volet de membrane limitante interne. Retour d'expérience sur 24 cas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery with a temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study of 24 patients who were operated on for macular hole between March 2014 and April 2017 at Nancy University Hospital. All patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique. ILM peeling was restricted to the temporal side of the fovea, and the macular hole was then covered with the ILM flap, followed by SF6 tamponnade and first day face-down positioning. The main outcome measures included macular hole closure rate and visual acuity at 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Eight men and 16 women of mean age 67.0±5.4 years were included. The mean axial length was 23.5±1.2mm. The mean diameter of the MH was 362±123µm. Closure of the MH was achieved in 23 of 24 eyes (95.8%) after one surgery. The mean BVCA improved significantly from 0.71±0.20 logMar to 0.29±0.22 logMar (P<0.001) at 1 month postoperatively, for a gain of 0.42±0.24 logMar. CONCLUSION: Macular hole surgery with the inverted ILM flap technique results in good anatomical and functional outcomes, comparable to those obtained with the classic technique with complete ILM peeling.

[Outpatient management without day 1 clinical follow-up of patients undergoing uncomplicated filtering surgery]. / Prise en charge ambulatoire sans contrôle clinique à j1 de patients opérés d'une chirurgie filtrante non compliquée en peropératoire.

INTRODUCTION: Although the general increase in ambulatory surgery allows for a 20% reduction in costs of hospitalization, the necessity of a day 1 postoperative visit remains the main problem for elderly patients or those who reside at considerable distance. For these reasons, in 2014, we decided to only see patients with uncomplicated filtering surgery at D5 and D21 and to replace the D1 visit with a telephone call. The primary goal of our study was to analyze a population of patients undergoing uncomplicated filtering surgery who were not seen at D1 and to describe the frequency of postoperative complications, intraocular pressure results and therapeutic management at D5 and D21. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric study in the department of ophthalmology. All patients (naïve of surgical treatment for glaucoma) underwent surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma in an ambulatory surgery unit between May 2014 and July 2016. A nurse made a phone call to the patients at day 1 and they responded to a standardized questionnaire. Depending upon their responses, the patients were seen quickly (<24hr) or on the systematic schedule at day 5 and day 21. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four eyes (126 patients) were included in our study. The mean preoperative IOP was 20.4±6.4mmHg. After the phone call, only five patients were examined before the first planned follow-up at day 5. For 3 of them, the examination revealed the presence of a hyphema, and their topical medication was changed. The other two patients had no treatment modifications. At day 5, the mean IOP was 10.6±5.9mmHg. Thirty-two eyes (22.2%) required a change in their medication at day 5. The mean IOP at day 21 was 12.9±4.6mmHg. Our success rate (IOP<21mmHg with no topical medication) at day 21 was 95.6%. DISCUSSION: The guidelines for filtering glaucoma surgery recommend examining the patient at day 1 (or at least before day 3), day 8, day 15 and day 30 or more frequently according to the case. We replaced the day 1 visit with a telephone call. We did not note a substantial rate of complications due to the elimination of the D1 visit. The criteria of success of filtering glaucoma surgery vary in the literature, but our success rate at D21 seems to be similar that in the literature and may suggest that the day 1 visit is not necessary if the surgery for primary open angle glaucoma is uncomplicated.

Central corneal thickness assessment after phacoemulsification: Subluxation versus Divide-and-Conquer.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of two phacoemulsification techniques (subluxation versus divide-and-conquer) on postoperative corneal edema at postoperative hour 1 and day 4. DESIGN: Comparative study. METHOD: Ninety-six consecutive patients (110 eyes; 43 men and 53 women, mean age 70.9±9.8 years) with equivalent cataract grades underwent cataract surgery and were followed up for 6 months. The presence of corneal edema was determined using central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT was measured preoperatively, and at postoperative hour 1 and day 4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ultrasound power (US %), duration of ultrasound (TPA), effective ultrasound time (TPE), surgical duration and final suture (%). RESULTS: Eyes of participants were divided into two phacoemulsification technique groups: subluxation (n=50 eyes) and divide-and-conquer (n=60 eyes). Non-inferiority analysis revealed similar CCT increases at postoperative hour 1 in both groups, with 69.9±44.9µm and 64.4±42.9µm, observed in the subluxation and divide-and-conquer groups, respectively (P=0.033). TPE was similar in both groups, taking 6.2±3.4 and 7.3±4.5seconds in the subluxation and divide-and-conquer groups, respectively (P=0.150). No correlation was seen between TPE and edema at postoperative hour 1, or between TPE and day 4 edema. Rate of final suture use was similar between the subluxation and divide and conquer groups, at 36% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that cataract surgery performed using the subluxation technique does not result in greater CCT than the divide-and-conquer technique. CCT appears to normalize by postoperative day 4, regardless of the technique used.