Assessment of operator performance during oocyte retrievals: residents' learning curve and continuous monitoring of senior physicians.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve cumulative summation test (LC CUSUM test) allows to define an individualized learning curve and determine the moment when clinical proficiency is attained. After acquisition of the skills, the cumulative summation test (CUSUM test) allows to monitor the maintenance of the required level over time. The LC CUSUM test has been frequently used in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) for several procedures, but only once for OR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study at Angers university hospital between May 2017 and September 2018. Seven Ob/Gyn residents and 5 senior physicians were included, and all OR performed during that time (n = 690) were analyzed. The performance index assessed was the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR), defined as the ratio of oocytes retrieved to follicles aspirated. We used the LC CUSUM test to analyze the learning curves of residents, and the CUSUM test to monitor the performance of senior physicians. An ORR ≥50% in 60% of retrievals was defined as the threshold for clinical proficiency. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-four oocyte retrieval (OR) were included: 315 were performed by residents, 220 by senior physicians, and 139 by both residents and physicians (mixed retrievals). Four residents (57%) reached the threshold after aspirating 82, 67, 53 and 46 ovaries, respectively. The mean number of ovaries aspirated in order to reach clinical proficiency was 62, and the mean number of weeks needed was 21. The duration of the learning period varied between 26 and 80 days. Two senior physicians (40%) remained proficient across the duration of the study, while two physicians (40%) had one statistically "suboptimal" OR, and one physician (20%) had two suboptimal retrievals. CONCLUSION: There is a large variability in the duration of the learning period and the number of procedures needed for a resident to master OR. Senior physicians maintain an adequate performance.

Surgical treatment of septate uterus in cases of primary infertility and before assisted reproductive technologies.

Septate uterus is the most common congenital uterine malformation in women with infertility. Several criteria are available for the definition of septate uteri, such as the one proposed by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) (ESHRE/ESGE), or by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), with notable differences between the two. Recently, a simplified classification was proposed by the Congenital Uterine Malformations Experts (CUME), where a septum is defined as an internal indentation depth≥10mm. To date, there is no consensus on the management of women with a septate uterus and infertility. We have performed an extensive literature appraisal and reviewed all the available international guidelines in order to propose a management strategy for infertile patients with a uterine septum. Hysteroscopic septum incision seems to improve natural conception rates in the year following surgery. Moreover, it improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes when performed before the embryo transfer, by improving embryo implantation rates. On the other hand, for patients with an arcuate uterus (indentation<1.5cm according to the ASRM guidelines) and infertility, it seems that assisted reproductive technologies are the most appropriate first line treatment. However, in cases of recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss following IVF, hysteroscopic section could be proposed. Overall, we recommend hysteroscopic septum incision for patients with primary infertility, and for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.

[In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation]. / Réponse insuffisante à la stimulation en vue de FIV : maintenir la ponction ou choisir l' insémination ?

In women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF), a poor ovarian response, defined as three of fewer mature follicles, can lead to cancellation of the cycle. However, in women with at least one patent tube and normal semen parameters, conversion to intrauterine insemination (IUI) is considered an option, offering reasonable pregnancy rates at a lower cost and without the complications associated with oocyte retrieval. Studies have shown that in cycles with only one mature follicle, IVF should be canceled. However, in cycles with 2 or 3 mature follicles, patients have the choice between IVF and conversion to IUI. Some studies have shown that IVF is superior to IUI in such cases, whereas other reports failed to find any difference. Most of these studies are retrospective and limited by the presence of several biases and low numbers of cycles, and to this date, there is no consensus on the best approach. We have thus designed a multicenter, randomized non-inferiority study, comparing live birth rates following conversion to IUI or IVF in patients with 2 or 3 mature follicles in COH cycles. Nine hundred and forty patients will be randomized on trigger day to either IVF or conversion to IUI. Our study will also include a medico-economic analysis.

[Training of medical students for pelvic examination: Benefits of teaching on anatomic models]. / Formation des externes à l'examen gynécologique : intérêt de l'enseignement sur modèles anatomiques.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits of training sessions for pelvic examination using anatomic models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical students (MS) registered in their 5th year of medical studies at Angers University Hospital had to complete two anonymous questionnaires; one at the beginning of the workshop and one at the end. Every procedure which included pelvic exam (PE), vaginal sample (VS), smear test (ST), insertion of a speculum and insertion of intra-uterine device (IUD) was evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-one MS answered both questionnaires. They were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcomes of the workshop in 91 % of the cases. At the beginning of the workshop, 28 %, 52 %, 30 %, 25 % and 3 % reported a low level of difficulty to carry out, respectively, a PE, VS, ST, insertion of a speculum, insertion of an IUD. At the end of the session, there were respectively 55 %, 83 %, 76 %, 66 % and 16 % of MS to report a low level of difficulty of these same procedures. For all of these procedures, there were a significant (P<0.05) number of MS who estimated the procedure's level of difficulty as being low at the end of the session. CONCLUSION: The level of technical difficulty of all procedures was significantly decreased at the end of the workshop.