Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J AOAC Int ; 99(3): 664-75, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27297837

ABSTRACT

The 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid Aerobic Count (RAC) Plate is a sample-ready culture medium system containing dual-sensor indicator technology for the rapid quantification of aerobic bacteria in food products. The 3M Petrifilm RAC Plate was compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA BAM) Chapter 3 (Aerobic Plate Count) for the enumeration of aerobic bacteria in raw easy-peel shrimp and the Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products (SMEDP) Chapter 6 (Standard Plate Count Method) for the enumeration of aerobic bacteria in pasteurized skim milk and instant nonfat dry milk (instant NFDM). The 3M Petrifilm RAC Plate was evaluated using a paired study design in a multilaboratory collaborative study following current AOAC validation guidelines. Three target contamination levels (low, 10-100 CFU/g; medium, 100-1000 CFU/g; and high 1000-10 000 CFU/g) were evaluated for naturally occurring aerobic microflora for each matrix. For raw easy-peel shrimp, duplicate 3M Petrifilm RAC Plates were enumerated after 24 ± 2 h incubation at both 32 and 35°C. Pasteurized skim milk 3M Petrifilm RAC Plates were enumerated after 24 ± 2 h incubation at 32°C, and instant NFDM 3M Petrifilm RAC Plates were enumerated after 48 ± 3 h incubation at 32°C. No statistical difference was observed between 3M Petrifilm RAC Plate and FDA BAM or SMEDP reference methods for each contamination level.


Subject(s)
Bacteria, Aerobic/isolation & purification , Bacterial Load , Laboratories
2.
J AOAC Int ; 98(3): 767-783, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26086256

ABSTRACT

The 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid Yeast and Mold (RYM) Count Plate is a simple, ready-to-use chromogenic culture method for the rapid detection and enumeration of yeast and mold in food products. The 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method was compared to the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA BAM) Chapter 18, Yeasts, Molds and Mycotoxins and the ISO 21527:2008 Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs-Horizontal Method for the Enumeration for Yeast and Molds - Part 1: Colony Count Technique in Products with Water Activity Greater Than 0.95 and Part 2: Colony Count Technique in Products with Water Activity Less Than or Equal to 0.95 reference methods for raw almonds and raw frozen ground beef patties (77% lean). The 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method was evaluated using a paired study design in a multi-laboratory collaborative study following the current AOAC Validation Guidelines. Three target contamination levels (low, 10-100 CFU/g; medium, 100-1000 CFU/g; high 1000-10 000 CFU/g) as well as an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/g) were evaluated for each matrix. Samples evaluated by the 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method were prepared in duplicate and incubated at both 25°C and 28°C. Plates at both temperatures were enumerated after 48 and 60 h of incubation. No significant difference was observed between the 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method and the FDA BAM or ISO 21527 reference methods for each contamination level. No statistical differences were observed between samples analyzed by the 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method (at either 25°C or 28°C) and the reference methods. No statistical significant differences were observed between enumeration of colonies at 48 and 60 h on the 3M Petrifilm RYM Count Plate method and the reference methods.


Subject(s)
Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Food Microbiology/instrumentation , Fungi/growth & development , Yeasts/growth & development , Animals , Cattle , Food Microbiology/methods , Meat/microbiology , Prunus/microbiology , Specimen Handling
3.
J AOAC Int ; 97(6): 1563-75, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25632434

ABSTRACT

The 3M™ Petriflm™ Salmonella Express (SALX) System is a simple, ready-to-use chromogenic culture medium system for the rapid qualitative detection and biochemical confirmation of Salmonella spp. in food and food process environmental samples. The 3M Petrifilm SALX System was compared using an unpaired study design in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS) Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) 4.07 (2013) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges for raw ground beef and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5, Salmonella (2011) reference method for dry dog food following the current AOAC validation guidelines. For this study, a total of 17 laboratories located throughout the continental United States evaluated 1872 test portions. For the 3M Petrifilm SALX System, raw ground beef was analyzed using 25 g test portions, and dry dog food was analyzed using 375 g test portions. For the reference methods, 25 g test portions of each inatrix were analyzed. The two matrices were artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels: an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). Each inoculation level was statistically analyzed using the probability of detection statistical model. For the raw ground beef and dry dog food test portions, no significant differences at the 95% confidence interval were observed in the number of positive samples detected by the 3M Petrifilm SALX System versus either the USDA/FSIS-MLG or FDA/BAM methods.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/instrumentation , Food Analysis/instrumentation , Food Microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , Dogs , Probability , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J AOAC Int ; 94(1): 159-71, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21391493

ABSTRACT

In a multilaboratory study, the effectiveness of an alternative method for rapid screening of Listeria species compared to traditional reference methods was demonstrated in a variety of food products. A collaborative study was conducted to compare the VIDAS Listeria species Xpress (LSX) method and the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria species in foods. Six food types were tested: vanilla ice cream, cheddar cheese, raw ground beef, frozen green beans, deli turkey, and cooked shrimp. Each food, inoculated with a different Listeria strain at two levels and uninoculated test portions, was analyzed by each method. A total of 15 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study 1134 tests were analyzed in the statistical analysis. There were 490 positives by the VIDAS LSX method using the sample boiling step, 483 positives by the VIDAS LSX method using the Heat and Go system, and 439 positives by the standard culture methods. Overall, the Chi-square result for the VIDAS LSX method with boiling for all foods was 7.25, indicating a significant statistical difference between the VIDAS method and the standard methods at the 5% confidence. For the VIDAS LSX method with the Heat and Go system, the Chi-square result for all foods was 5.37, indicating a significant statistical difference between the VIDAS LSX assay with the Heat and Go system and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance. In both cases, the VIDAS method was more sensitive than the standard methods. The LSX method detects Listeria species in foods with negative or presumptive positive results in a minimum of 30 h compared to at least 5 days for the cultural methods. Based on the results of this collaborative study, it is recommended that the VIDAS LSX method be adopted as an AOAC Official Method for the detection of Listeria species in dairy products, vegetables, seafood, raw meats and poultry, and processed meats and poultry.


Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Food Microbiology/methods , Listeria/isolation & purification , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques , Cattle , Cooperative Behavior , Dairy Products/microbiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/instrumentation , Food Microbiology/instrumentation , Humans , Listeria/pathogenicity , Meat/microbiology , Meat Products/microbiology , Poultry/microbiology , Poultry Products/microbiology , Seafood/microbiology , Vegetables/microbiology
5.
J AOAC Int ; 91(1): 164-73, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18376599

ABSTRACT

A multilaboratory study was conducted to determine the limit of detection (LOD) of Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SET) in 5 foods. Cooked chicken, ham, potato salad, pasteurized liquid whole milk, and canned mushrooms were each spiked with a different enterotoxin (A, B, C1, D, or E), and tested at 0.25 and 0.5 ng/g SET levels to determine the LOD of the assay for those foods in a collaborative study. Unspiked controls were also included. A total of 19 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1674 test portions were analyzed, of which 1638 were used in the statistical analysis. Of the 1638 test portions used in the statistical analysis, 1104 were spiked test portions, of which 1073 were positive by the VIDAS Staph enterotoxin II (SET 2) method. The detection rates at the 0.25 ng/mL level were cooked chicken, 98.2%; ham, 99.0%; potato salad, 99.1%; liquid whole milk, 85.2%; and canned mushrooms, 100%. The detection rates at the 0.5 ng/mL level were cooked chicken, 97.4%; ham, 98.1%; potato salad, 100%; liquid whole milk, 99.0%; and canned mushrooms, 100%. The data indicate that the SET 2 method is capable of detecting SET at 0.25 ng/g in cooked chicken, ham, potato salad, and canned mushrooms and at 0.5 ng/g in pasteurized liquid whole milk.


Subject(s)
Enterotoxins/analysis , Food Microbiology , Immunoassay/methods , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus/pathogenicity
6.
J AOAC Int ; 88(3): 750-60, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16001849

ABSTRACT

A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the VIDAS LIS immunoassay with the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria in foods using an enrichment modification of AOAC Official Method 999.06. The modified enrichment protocol was implemented to harmonize the VIDAS LIS assay with the VIDAS LMO2 assay. Five food types--brie cheese, vanilla ice cream, frozen green beans, frozen raw tilapia fish, and cooked roast beef--at 3 inoculation levels, were analyzed by each method. A total of 15 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1206 test portions were tested, of which 1170 were used in the statistical analysis. There were 433 positive by the VIDAS LIS assay and 396 positive by the standard culture methods. A Chi-square analysis of each of the 5 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. The resulting average Chi square analysis, 0.42, indicated that, overall, there are no statistical differences between the VIDAS LIS assay and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance.


Subject(s)
Food Analysis/methods , Food Contamination , Food Microbiology , Immunoassay/methods , Listeria/metabolism , Animals , Cheese/microbiology , Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Fabaceae/microbiology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Frozen Foods/microbiology , Ice Cream/microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tilapia/microbiology , Vegetables/microbiology
7.
J AOAC Int ; 87(5): 1123-32, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15493669

ABSTRACT

A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the VIDAS Listeria monocytogenes II (LMO2) immunoassay and the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Five food types-vanilla ice cream, brie cheese, cooked roast beef, frozen green beans, and frozen tilapia fish-at 3 levels were analyzed by each method. A total of 26 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1404 test portions were analyzed of which 1152 were used in the statistical analysis. There were 448 positive by the VIDAS LMO2 assay and 457 positive by the standard culture methods. A chi2 analysis of each of the 5 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. The resulting chi2 value, 0.36, indicates that overall, there are no statistical differences between the VIDAS LMO2 assay and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Immunoassay
8.
J AOAC Int ; 87(2): 395-410, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15164834

ABSTRACT

A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the automated BAX system and the standard cultural methods for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Six food types (frankfurters, soft cheese, smoked salmon, raw, ground beef, fresh radishes, and frozen peas) were analyzed by each method. For each food type, 3 inoculation levels were tested: high (average of 2 CFU/g), low (average of 0.2 CFU/g) and uninoculated controls. A total of 25 laboratories representing government and industry participated. Of the 2335 samples analyzed, 1109 were positive by the BAX system and 1115 were positive by the standard method. A Chi square analysis of each of the 6 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. For all foods, except radishes, the BAX system performed as well as or better than the standard reference methods based on the Chi square results.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Chi-Square Distribution
9.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 963-70, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632398

ABSTRACT

The 3M Petrifilm Staph Express Count plate method was compared with AOAC Official Method 975.55 for the enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in selected foods. Five foods--ice cream, raw milk, yogurt, whey powder, and cheese--were analyzed for S. aureus by 12 collaborating laboratories. For each food tested, the collaborators received 8 blind test samples consisting of a control sample, a low inoculation level, a medium inoculation level, and a medium inoculation level with background flora, each in duplicate. The mean log10 counts for the methods were comparable for all 5 foods. The repeatability and reproducibility variances of the 24 h Petrifilm Staph Express Count plate method were similar to those of the 72 h standard method.


Subject(s)
Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Dairy Products/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Animals , Cheese/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/instrumentation , Ice Cream/microbiology , Laboratories , Milk/microbiology , Milk Proteins , Reproducibility of Results , Whey Proteins , Yogurt/microbiology
10.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 954-62, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632397

ABSTRACT

The 3M Petrifilm Staph Express Count plate method was compared with AOAC Official Method 975.55 for the enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in selected foods. Five foods--frozen lasagna, custard, frozen mixed vegetables, frozen hashbrowns, and frozen batter-coated mushrooms--were analyzed for S. aureus by 13 collaborating laboratories. For each food tested, the collaborators received 8 blind test samples consisting of a control sample, a low inoculation level, a medium inoculation level, and a medium inoculation level with background flora, each in duplicate. The mean log10 counts for the methods were comparable for all 5 foods. The repeatability and reproducibility variances of the 24 h Petrifilm Staph Express Count plate method were similar to those of the 72 h standard method.


Subject(s)
Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Food Microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Agaricales , Colony Count, Microbial/instrumentation , Food Handling , Food Preservation/methods , Freezing , Reproducibility of Results , Vegetables/microbiology
11.
J AOAC Int ; 86(6): 1149-59, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14979696

ABSTRACT

A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the automated BAX System to the standard cultural methods for detection of Salmonella in selected foods. Five food types--frankfurters, raw ground beef, mozzarella cheese, raw frozen tilapia fish, and orange juice--at 3 inoculation levels, were analyzed by each method. A sixth food type, raw ground chicken, was tested using 3 naturally contaminated lots. A total of 16 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1386 samples were analyzed, of which 1188 were paired samples and 198 were unpaired samples. Of the 1188 paired samples, 461 were positive by both methods and 404 were negative by both methods. Thirty-seven samples were positive by the BAX System but negative by the standard reference method, and 11 samples were positive by standard cultural method and negative by the BAX System. Of the 198 unpaired samples, 106 were positive by the BAX System and 60 were positive by the standard cultural method. A Chi square analysis of each of the 6 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. For all foods, the BAX System demonstrated results comparable to those of the standard reference methods based on the Chi square results.


Subject(s)
Cheese/microbiology , Citrus/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella/chemistry , Animals , Autoanalysis , Beverages/microbiology , Cattle , Chickens , Culture Media , Indicators and Reagents , Tilapia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...