Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 39(6): 1509-1518, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36790496

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (ATRTs) are malignant embryonal tumours of childhood that affect the central nervous system (CNS). We aim to determine which factors, including patient age, extent of resection (EOR), presence of distal metastasis and use of adjuvant therapies, affect overall survival in children with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (ATRTs) treated at this single centre. METHODS: Retrospective cohort review of patients with histological diagnosis of ATRT treated over 21 years (1999-2020) was conducted. Data on demographics, tumour location, presence of metastasis, use of adjuvant therapy, extent of resection (EOR), complications, neurological outcome post-surgery, and overall survival were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 45 children (mean age 2 years) underwent 64 operations. 25 patients were <1 year of age. Gross-total resection (GTR) pre-adjuvant therapy was achieved in 15, near-total resection (NTR) in 15, subtotal resection (STR) in 9, and biopsy in 6 children. Most children had good neurological outcomes post-operatively (28/45 with GOS 5). Fourteen patients survived longer than 4 years. Survival analysis showed a significant difference in median survival in favour of GTR and localised disease. There was no significant difference in median survival between patients <1 year vs >1 year of age (p=0.84). CONCLUSION: We find that presence of metastasis was an important factor in poor survival in patients with ATRT. GTR, where possible, may confer significant survival benefit in ATRT. Children aged <1 year appear to have performed as well as those >1 year and therefore should still be considered for radical surgery.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Rhabdoid Tumor , Teratoma , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Rhabdoid Tumor/surgery , Rhabdoid Tumor/pathology , Teratoma/surgery , Teratoma/pathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis
2.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(10): 3189-3197, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34554301

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Children affected by premature fusion of the cranial sutures due to craniosynostosis can present with raised intracranial pressure and (turri)brachycephalic head shapes that require surgical treatment. Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion (SA-PVE) is the surgical technique of choice at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (GOSH), London, UK. This study aims to report the SA-PVE clinical experience of GOSH to date. METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out including all SA-PVE cases performed at GOSH between 2008 and 2020. Demographic and clinical data were recorded including genetic diagnosis, craniofacial surgical history, surgical indication and assessment, age at time of surgery (spring insertion and removal), operative time, in-patient stay, blood transfusion requirements, additional/secondary (cranio)facial procedures, and complications. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2020, 200 SA-PVEs were undertaken in 184 patients (61% male). The study population consisted of patients affected by syndromic (65%) and non-syndromic disorders. Concerns regarding raised intracranial pressure were the surgical driver in 75% of the cases, with the remainder operated for shape correction. Median age for SA-PVE was 19 months (range, 2-131). Average operative time for first SA-PVE was 150 min and 87 for spring removal. Median in-patient stay was 3 nights, and 88 patients received a mean of 204.4 ml of blood transfusion at time of spring insertion. A single SA-PVE sufficed in 156 patients (85%) to date (26 springs still in situ at time of this analysis); 16 patients underwent repeat SA-PVE, whilst 12 underwent rigid redo. A second SA-PVE was needed in significantly more cases when the first SA-PVE was performed before age 1 year. Complications occurred in 26 patients with a total of 32 events, including one death. Forty-one patients underwent fronto-orbital remodelling at spring removal and 22 required additional cranio(maxillo)facial procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion is a safe, efficient, and effective procedure based on our 12-year experience. Those that are treated early in life might require a repeat SA-PVE. Long-term follow-up is recommended as some would require additional craniomaxillofacial correction later in life.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Intracranial Hypertension , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Child , Child, Preschool , Cranial Sutures/surgery , Craniosynostoses/diagnostic imaging , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , Skull/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...