Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Hum Hypertens ; 24(4): 254-62, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20090775

ABSTRACT

There are several methods of assessing total arterial compliance (TAC) based on the two element Windkessel model, which is a ratio of pressure and volume, but the optimal technique is unclear. In this study, three methods of estimating TAC were compared to determine which was the most robust in a large group of patients with and without cardiovascular risk. In all, 320 patients (170 men; age 55+/-10) were studied; TAC was determined by the pulse-pressure method (PPM), the area method (AM) and the stroke volume/pulse-pressure method (SVPP). We obtained arterial waveforms using radial applanation tonometry, dimensions using two-dimensional echocardiography and flow data by Doppler. Clinical data, risk factors, echo parameters and TAC by all three methods were then compared. TAC (ml mm Hg(-1)) by the PPM was 1.24+/-0.51, by the AM 1.84+/-0.90 and by the SVPP 1.96+/-0.76 (P<0.0001 between groups). Correlation was good between all methods: PPM/AM r=0.83, PPM/SVPP r=0.94 and AM/SVPP r=0.80 (all P<0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed significant differences between patients with and those without cardiovascular risk for all three methods; TAC-AM and TAC-SVPP values were similar and significantly higher than TAC-PPM. The only significant relationships observed with TAC and echo parameters were in left ventricular (LV) septal thickness (R(2)=0.07; P<0.0001) and LV mass (R(2)=0.04; P=0.004). Normal and abnormal values of TAC vary according to method, which should be expressed. Each of the techniques shows good correlation with each other, however, values for TAC-PPM are significantly lower. TAC-PPM and TAC-SVPP are comparable in determining differences between groups with and without cardiovascular risk.


Subject(s)
Compliance/physiology , Echocardiography , Hypertension/diagnostic imaging , Hypertension/physiopathology , Manometry , Models, Cardiovascular , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/epidemiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left
2.
Heart ; 95(16): 1343-9, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19429570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the effects of a 1-year exercise intervention on myocardial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial, the Diabetes Lifestyle Intervention Study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 223 T2DM patients without occult coronary artery disease, aged 18-75 were randomised to an exercise training group (n = 111) or a usual care group (n = 112). Complete follow-up data were available in 176 (88 exercise, 88 usual care). INTERVENTIONS: Exercise training consisted of gym, followed by telephone-monitored home-based exercise training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tissue Doppler-derived myocardial velocities, strain-rate and strain, body composition, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) and physical activity. RESULTS: Overall changes in myocardial function were not different between groups despite improvements in waist circumference, fat mass, blood glucose, HbA(1c), insulin sensitivity, VO(2max) and 6-minute walk distance in the intervention group (p<0.05). The latter also spent significantly more time in vigorous activity (p<0.05). A post-hoc analysis revealed that intervention patients who spent more time in both moderate and vigorous activity showed a significant improvement in myocardial tissue velocity (p<0.01), HbA(1c) (p = 0.03) and VO(2max) (p = 0.03) compared to controls. Myocardial strain rate (p = 0.03) and HbA(1c) improved in intervention patients with the greatest increase in moderate activity (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM, current exercise recommendations led to an improvement in metabolic function, but failed to improve myocardial function in the overall group. Patients with greater increases in both moderate and vigorous activity showed improvements in myocardial function, glycaemic control and cardiorespiratory fitness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12607000060448.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Angiopathies/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Composition , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology , Coronary Circulation , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetic Angiopathies/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Angiopathies/physiopathology , Echocardiography , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Consumption , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Young Adult
3.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 35(7): 438-43, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16008545

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brachial pulse pressure (BPP) is a predictor of outcome in epidemiologic studies, but brachial and aortic pulse pressure (AoPP) may not correspond and both are influenced by multiple parameters including arterial properties and cardiac output. We sought to what extent pulse pressure (PP) measurements reflected direct measurement of arterial properties, assessed as total arterial compliance (TAC). METHODS: We studied 123 patients (76 men; age 55 +/- 11); 31 normal controls, 46 patients with coronary artery disease and 46 patients with hypertension. PP was determined from brachial cuff pressure and TAC was measured by simultaneous radial applanation tonometry and pulsed wave Doppler of the LV outflow. AoPP was calculated using a transfer function from the radial waveform. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between BPP and AoPP (57 +/- 16 vs. 45 +/- 14; P < 0.0001), although TAC correlated with BPP (r = -0.72; P = 0.01) and AoPP (r = -0.66; P = 0.01). In a multiple linear regression, the difference between BPP and AoPP was predicted by cardiac output (CO) (P = 0.002) and gender (P = 0.03). Bland-Altman analysis showed the best correspondence between BPP and AoPP in the middle tertile (CO 4.7 to 5.7 L min(-1)) with less correlation in the low and high tertiles. The same analysis by gender showed a higher difference in women than men (14 +/- 6 vs. 10 +/- 5; P < 0.0001). The difference between BPP and AoPP showed the best correlation in the control group and the worst in the hypertension group. CONCLUSION: BPP correlates with TAC in men with normal cardiac function. However, in women, in patients at the low and high extremes of function, and in patients with preclinical and overt cardiovascular disease, there appears to be incremental value in measuring TAC.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Vascular Resistance , Adult , Aged , Anthropometry , Aorta/physiopathology , Blood Pressure , Brachial Artery/physiopathology , Cardiac Output , Compliance , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Stress , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnostic imaging , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...