Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Epratuzumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to- Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From an Open-Label Extension Study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess the long-term safety of repeated courses of epratuzumab therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Secondary objectives were to assess long-term efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Eligible patients from the 12-week, phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled EMBLEM study enrolled into the open-label extension (OLE) study, SL0008. In the SL0008 study, patients received 1,200 mg epratuzumab infusions at weeks 0 and 2 of repeating 12-week cycles, plus standard of care. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs. Efficacy measures included combined treatment response, the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group score, the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score, and the physician's and patient's global assessment of disease activity. Total daily corticosteroid dose and HRQOL (by the Short Form 36 health survey) were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 113 of the 203 patients (55.7%) who entered the SL0008 study continued epratuzumab therapy until study closure (total cumulative exposure: 381.3 patient-years, median exposure: 845 days, and maximum exposure: 1,185 days/approximately 3.2 years). TEAEs were reported in 192 patients (94.6%); most common were infections and infestations (68.0%, 138 patients). Serious TEAEs were reported in 51 patients (25.1%), and 14 patients (6.9%) had serious infections. In patients treated for 108 weeks (n = 116), the median corticosteroid dose was reduced from 10.0 mg/day at OLE screening to 5.0 mg/day at week 108. Improvements in efficacy and HRQOL measures in EMBLEM were maintained in the OLE, while placebo patients exhibited similar improvements in disease activity upon a switch to epratuzumab. CONCLUSION: Open-label epratuzumab treatment was well tolerated for up to 3.2 years, and associated with sustained improvements in disease activity and HRQOL, while steroids were reduced.

Polymorphisms within the human leucocyte antigen-E gene and their associations with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis as well as clinical outcome of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy.

Involvement of the non-classical human leucocyte antigen-E (HLA-E) in both innate and acquired immune response suggests its possible role in development of autoimmune pathologies. This study was undertaken to investigate relationships between the HLA-E gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and a risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as to evaluate a potential of these polymorphisms to modulate clinical outcome of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment in female patients. A total of 223 female patients with RA receiving anti-TNF biological therapy and 134 female healthy subjects were enrolled into the study. Genotypings for two SNPs within the HLA-E gene (rs1264457 HLA-E*01:01/01:03; rs1059510 HLA-E*01:03:01/01:03:02) were performed using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification employing LightSNiP assays. Clinical response was evaluated according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of the therapy. The frequency of the HLA-E*01:01/01:01 genotype was decreased significantly in RA patients in comparison to controls (P = 0.031). The presence of the HLA-E*01:01/01:01 genotype in patients correlated with better EULAR response after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment, while 01:03 allele carriers were generally unresponsive to the treatment (P = 0.014). The HLA-E*01:03/01:03 genotype was also over-represented among non-responding patients in comparison to HLA-E*01:01/01:01 homozygotes (P = 0.021). With respect to the HLA-E rs1059510 variation, a better response after 12 weeks was observed more frequently in patients carrying the HLA-E*01:03:01/01:03:01 genotype than other genotypes (P = 0.009). The results derived from this study imply that HLA-E polymorphisms may influence RA susceptibility and affect clinical outcome of anti-TNF therapy in female RA patients.

Effect of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor on serum level of dickkopf-1 protein and bone morphogenetic protein-7 in ankylosing spondylitis patients with high disease activity.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in serum levels of the bone remodelling molecules dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), sclerostin, wingless-type protein-3a (Wnt-3a), and bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) during 6 months of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with high disease activity. METHOD: We included 40 patients with axial AS: 20 patients with high disease activity were assigned to treatment with TNF inhibitor and 20 with low disease activity were assigned to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment. Markers of bone remodelling and inflammation were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: In the TNF inhibitor-treated group Dkk-1 decreased significantly from 196.8 pg/mL [95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1-399.0] to 116.3 pg/mL (95% CI 38.0-301.6) and BMP-7 increased significantly from 1.4 pg/mL (95% CI 0-23.0) to 20.3 pg/mL (95% CI 4.9-41.3). There was a significant negative correlation between Dkk-1 and BMP-7 at 6 months (r = -0.64, p = 0.004) in this group. Non-parametric regression analysis adjusted for disease duration, age, sex, baseline modified Stoke's Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) confirmed a statistically significant effect of treatment on time-related changes of Dkk-1 and BMP-7. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, and also the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score decreased significantly in the anti-TNF-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Among the potential biomarkers of bone remodelling in AS, Dkk-1 and BMP-7 displayed significant time alterations and correlative interactions during anti-TNF treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of two different molecular weight (MW) hyaluronans F60027 and Hylan G-F20 in symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA). Results of a non inferiority, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of a 'medium' molecular weight (MW) hyaluronan product (F60027, Structovial) with a 'high' MW (Hylan G-F20, Synvisc). METHODS: Prospective, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, active controlled, parallel-group study with a non-inferiority design. Patients with symptomatic KOA, global pain ≥ 40 mm (VAS, 0-100), Lequesne index (LFI, 0-24) score >7 and radiological Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2/3 were centrally randomised to receive F60027 or Hylan G-F20, administered via three weekly injections, with regular follow-up evaluations up to week 24 (W24). The primary outcome was LFI score change over 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes comprised pain VAS, quality of life, patient's and physician's global assessments, rescue medication consumption and OMERACT-OARSI responders rate. RESULTS: 276 patients were analysed in the full analysis dataset (FAS), 236 in the Per Protocol dataset (PP). In the main efficacy analysis (PP), the difference of the LFI score change over 24 weeks between F60027 (-4.67 (0.27)) and Hylan G-F20 (-4.54 (0.28)) was 0.132 [95%CI: -0.598, 0.861] which met the predefined non-inferiority margin. Analyses of secondary efficacy criteria showed clinically relevant improvements of all outcomes at W24 for each treatment on both PP/FAS populations. Changes of LFI score between baseline and W24 were -5.73 in the F60027 and -5.57 in the Hylan G-F20 group (PP dataset). Few local reactions were reported: 3.6% of patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS: F60027 and Hylan G-F20 were equally effective in reducing functional impairment and relieving pain in KOA patients, and well-tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of pamapimod in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving stable methotrexate therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomised to one of six dose groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind pamapimod (up to 300 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with > or =20% improvement in RA based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 12 weeks. Secondary measures were ACR50, Disease Activity Score (DAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses and the individual ACR core set of parameters. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing and immunology assessments. RESULTS: On a background of MTX, the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response at week 12 in the pamapimod groups (31% to 43%) was not significantly different from placebo (34%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically mild and included infections, gastrointestinal disturbances, dizziness and rashes; AEs resulting in discontinuation of study drug were primarily attributed to infections. CONCLUSION: In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, pamapimod showed non-significant improvement in efficacy outcomes compared to placebo.