Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 25(6): 595-597, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789599

ABSTRACT

Consensus-based technical guidance for electronic case reporting (eCR) of sexually transmitted infections was implemented within existing health information technologies to automatically detect chlamydia and gonorrhea cases based on diagnosis and laboratory observation codes and build a case report using industry standards. The process was evaluated using 12 420 ambulatory encounters among adolescents and adults 15 years and older seen at 8 Chicago-area community health centers between May 1 and June 30, 2017. We tabulated the frequency of matches between the case detection logic and patient data and compared the eCR identified cases with paper case reports. This study found that eCR increased provider reporting when compared with paper reporting alone. While additional work across stakeholder groups is needed, these early findings suggest that broadly adopted eCR will decrease both provider and public health burden while improving reporting timeliness and data completion to support case investigation.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Disease Notification/methods , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Adolescent , Automation/methods , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Humans , Pilot Projects , Young Adult
2.
Am J Public Health ; 102(4): 633-42, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22397343

ABSTRACT

Currently, public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) is not well defined. Discussions about public health preparedness often make little progress, for lack of a shared understanding of the topic. We present a concise yet comprehensive framework describing PHEP activities. The framework, which was refined for 3 years by state and local health departments, uses terms easily recognized by the public health workforce within an information flow consistent with the National Incident Management System. To assess the framework's completeness, strengths, and weaknesses, we compare it to 4 other frameworks: the RAND Corporation's PREPARE Pandemic Influenza Quality Improvement Toolkit, the National Response Framework's Public Health and Medical Services Functional Areas, the National Health Security Strategy Capabilities List, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's PHEP Capabilities.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Public Health , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Syphilis/prevention & control , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...