The Reliability and Validity of the Mandarin Chinese Version of the Vocal Fatigue Index: Preliminary Validation.

PURPOSE: This study attempted to develop and to preliminarily validate the Mandarin Chinese version of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) as a standardized self-assessment questionnaire tool for potential clinical applications. METHOD: The experimental procedure involved (a) cross-cultural adaptation of the VFI into the Mandarin Chinese version (CVFI), (b) evaluation by an expert panel, (c) back translation, (d) pilot testing, and (e) validation of the questionnaire by three participant groups: 50 with voice disorders, 50 occupational voice users (at-risk group), and 50 with normal voice (control group). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and convergent validity of the CVFI were examined, and discriminatory ability (diagnostic accuracy) for distinguishing between the groups was evaluated. RESULTS: Results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ .8817 for the total CVFI scores for all groups), high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ .9072, p < .001 for the total CVFI scores for all groups), high content validity (total content validity index = 0.9368), and high convergent validity (Pearson r ≥ .8155, p < .001 between the total CVFI scores and Factors 1 and 2 scores). Significant differences between the three groups were found in all scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing between the disorders group and the normal group (area under the curve ≥ 0.927, p < .001 for the total CVFI scores and Factors 1 and 2 scores), with cutoff scores of ≥ 36 (total CVFI score), ≥ 23.5 (Factor 1 score), ≥ 7.5 (Factor 2 score), and ≤ 6.5 (Factor 3 score). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that the CVFI could be a reliable and valid self-assessment tool for the clinical evaluation of vocal fatigue in Mandarin Chinese-speaking populations. A full-scale validation study of the CVFI is recommended to verify these results.

Phonation Threshold Pressure/Flow for Reflecting Glottal Closure in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous theoretical analysis predicted that phonation threshold flow (PTF) could be a more sensitive aerodynamic measure than phonation threshold pressure (PTP) for reflecting glottal incompetence. This study investigated the feasibility of whether PTP and PTF may differentiate subjects with unilateral adductor vocal fold paralysis and paresis (UAVFP) from those without, and whether PTP and PTF could reflect the extent of incomplete glottal closure associated with UAVFP. METHODS: PTP and PTF were quantified for 13 subjects with UAVFP and 21 control subjects with normal voice, and the normalized glottal gap area (NGGA) based on videostroboscopic image analysis was quantified for subjects with UAVFP. RESULTS: Significant differences in both PTP and PTF were found between subjects with UAVFP and control subjects. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated a higher discriminatory ability of PTP for differentiating subjects with UAVFP from those without (area under the curve of 0.905 for PTP, 0.678 for PTF), yet a significant positive correlation was found between PTF and NGGA (Spearman's ρ = 0.571) but not between PTP and NGGA (ρ = -0.364). CONCLUSION: Results supported the feasibility of using PTP and PTF as potential diagnostic indicators for reflecting glottal closure in UAVFP, with PTP potentially more sensitive for differentiating subjects with and without incomplete glottal closure. These preliminary findings were limited by the small sample size, with further studies needed to verify whether PTF could be more sensitive for reflecting the extent of incomplete glottal closure, as predicted theoretically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1598-E1604, 2021.