Renal perfusion in scleroderma patients assessed by microbubble-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Renal damage is common in scleroderma. It can occur acutely or chronically. Renal reserve might already be impaired before it can be detected by laboratory findings. Microbubble-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been demonstrated to improve blood perfusion imaging in organs. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess renal perfusion in scleroderma patients utilizing this novel technique. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Microbubble-based contrast agent was infused and destroyed by using high mechanical index by Siemens Sequoia (curved array, 4.5 MHz). Replenishment was recorded for 8 seconds. Regions of interests (ROI) were analyzed in renal parenchyma, interlobular artery and renal pyramid with quantitative contrast software (CUSQ 1.4, Siemens Acuson, Mountain View, California). Time to maximal Enhancement (TmE), maximal enhancement (mE) and maximal enhancement relative to maximal enhancement of the interlobular artery (mE%A) were calculated for different ROIs. RESULTS: There was a linear correlation between the time to maximal enhancement in the parenchyma and the glomerular filtration rate. However, the other parameters did not reveal significant differences between scleroderma patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Renal perfusion of scleroderma patients including the glomerular filtration rate can be assessed using microbubble-based contrast media.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound in the detection of liver metastases: a prospective multi-centre dose testing study using a perfluorobutane microbubble contrast agent (NC100100).

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a dose testing analysis of perfluorobutane microbubble (NC100100) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to determine the optimal dose for detection of liver metastases in patients with extra-hepatic primary malignancy. METHODS: 157 patients were investigated with conventional US and CEUS. CEUS was performed following intravenous administration of perfluorobutane microbubbles (using one dose of either 0.008, 0.08, 0.12 or 0.36 µL/kg body weight). Three blinded off-site readers recorded the number and locations of metastatic lesions detected by US and CEUS. Contrast enhanced CT and MRI were used as the "Standard Of Reference" (SOR). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of liver metastasis detection with US versus CEUS, for each dose group were obtained. Dose group analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: 165 metastases were present in 92 patients who each had 1-7 lesions present on the SOR. Sensitivity of US versus CEUS (for all doses combined) was 38% and 67% (p = 0.0001). The 0.12 dose group with CEUS (78%) had significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy (70%) compared to other dose groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of CEUS is dose dependent with the 0.12 µL/kg NC100100 dose group showing the greatest sensitivity and accuracy in detection of liver metastases.

A prospective study comparing different iodine concentrations for triphasic multidetector row CT of the upper abdomen.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different iodine concentrations at either constant injection or iodine administration rates but constant total iodine load on contrast enhancement of liver, pancreas and spleen by multidetector row CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients (70+/-6 years) underwent triphasic liver CT at a four-channel multidetector-row CT using the non-ionic contrast medium iopromide. Patients were divided into six equal groups-I: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; II: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; III: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; IV: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 5 ml/s; V: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml, 60 ml at 6 ml/s, 60 ml at 3 ml/s; VI: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 3.3 ml/s. ROIs were measured in the liver, the pancreas, and the spleen in unenhanced, arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phase. RESULTS: At a constant injection rate of 4 ml/s, pancreatic enhancement over baseline only in the arterial phase was significantly higher at 370 mg/ml (58+/-15 HU versus 59+/-18 HU versus 74+/-20 HU for groups I-III, respectively (p<0.02)). Comparison of different iodine concentrations at constant iodine administration rate (groups II, IV and VI) and of all six protocols revealed no significant differences at either phase. CONCLUSIONS: At a constant iodine load and constant injection rates, the high-iodinated contrast agent iopromide at 370 mg/ml improves pancreatic enhancement in the arterial phase. At constant iodine load and constant iodine administration rates, there is no significant effect of different iodine concentrations.

Comparison of different iodine concentrations for multidetector row computed tomography angiography of segmental renal arteries.

The aims of this study were (1) to assess the diagnostic performance of multidetector row computed tomography angiography (CTA) on imaging of renal artery branches and (2) to investigate the effect of different iodine concentrations at constant total iodine load and either constant injection rates or constant iodine administration rates. A number of 120 consecutive patients (71+/-6 years of age) underwent CTA of renal arteries (collimation 4 x 1 mm) using the nonionic contrast medium iopromide, and were divided into six equal groups: 1: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 2: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 3: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 4: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 5 ml/s; 5: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml, 60 ml at 6 ml/s, 60 ml at 3 ml/s; 6: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 3.3 ml/s. The image quality of the main renal arteries (n=240) and their first-order to fourth-order branches was scored as 0 for no visualization, 1 for only visualization, and 2 for diagnostic. All main renal arteries were diagnostic. First-order branches had score 2 in 38/40, 40/40, 37/40, 38/40, 39/40, and 40/40 patients for groups 1-6, respectively (p=0.34). Second-order branches were imaged best in group 2 (p<0.002)). Third-order branches had score 2 in only 1/40, 5/40, 1/40, 2/40, 0/40, and 2/40 renal arteries. Fourth-order branches were not imaged diagnostically. At a constant total iodine load, the main renal arteries and their first-order branches achieved diagnostic image quality at all iodine concentrations in four-channel multidetector row CTA for the protocols tested. Second-order renal artery branches were imaged best at 120 ml contrast medium with an iodine concentration of 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s.

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography of hepatic tumors.

Liver tumors are defined using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to histological diagnosis, respectively, long-term follow-ups. Forty-two focal liver lesions in 39 patients were examined by contrast harmonic imaging over a period of 2 min after bolus injection of 10-ml galactose-based contrast agent. Vascular enhancement was quantified by using a dedicated software that allowed us to place representative regions of interest (ROI) in the center of the lesion, in the complete lesion, in regular liver parenchyma and in representative liver vessels (artery, vein and portal vein). Peak enhancement was judged to be either in the arterial, portal venous or in the late phase of liver perfusion. The lesion was described as hypovascular, isovascular and hypervascular compared to liver parenchyma. Contrast uptake was described as centrifugal or centripetal and peripheral or homogenous, respectively. Characterization of the lesions was performed unenhanced and after contrast by four independent specialists unaware of histology. Diagnosis of malignancy was evaluated by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, also overall accuracy, average sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Interobserver agreement was defined by the Kappa statistics. Histologic examination revealed 29 malignant [hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), n=11; cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), n=1; lymphoma, n=1; metastases, n=16)] and 7 benign [hemangioma, n=1; focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), n=4, adenoma, n=2)] lesions. Six benign lesions (hemangioma n=1; FNH n=5) were proved by long-term follow-up. ROC analysis regarding the diagnosis of malignancy showed values from 0.43 to 0.62 (mean 0.57) before and from 0.70 to 0.80 (mean 0.75) after contrast agent, respectively. The average values for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative and positive predictive values were 66, 26, 62, 45 and 73% unenhanced and 83, 49, 73, 65 and 82% after contrast, respectively. The interobserver agreement was 0.54 and 0.65 for unenhanced and enhanced examinations, respectively. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography improves the diagnosis of malignancy in liver lesions.