Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Psychol Assess ; 35(4): 325-338, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36633979

ABSTRACT

There is a clear need to improve the measurement of posttraumatic symptoms in veterans seeking trauma-focused treatment. We evaluated the structure and psychometric performance of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in a naturalistic sample of veterans engaging in evidence-based therapy in a Veterans Affairs (VA) PTSD outpatient clinic. We collected data from 500 sequential patients at the beginning and end of treatment, evaluating the PCL-5 factor structure followed by psychometric analyses. Results align with recent research following rigorous methods and advanced statistical techniques in suggesting a unidimensional factor structure for the PCL-5, with indications for its items representing a general factor with no clear support for multiple factors or subscales aligned with specific symptom clusters. In addition, psychometric analyses suggest a wider range of potential cutoff scores predicting PTSD diagnosis that may be specific to this population or setting. Given the remaining research questions surrounding the PCL-5 and its structure and functioning specifically, as well as the evolving conceptualizations of PTSD as a psychological disorder, further research is needed to guide clinical practice and future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Veterans , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Veterans/psychology , Psychometrics , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
2.
Telemed J E Health ; 28(10): 1496-1504, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35231193

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Autonomic dysfunction has been implicated as a consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Heart rate variability (HRV) may be a viable measure of autonomic dysfunction that could enhance rehabilitative interventions for individuals with TBI. This pilot study sought to assess the feasibility and validity of using the Zeriscope™ platform system in a real-world clinical setting to measure HRV in active-duty service members with TBI who were participating in an intensive outpatient program. Methods: Twenty-five service members with a history of mild, moderate, or severe TBI were recruited from a military treatment facility. A baseline assessment was conducted in the cardiology clinic where point validity data were obtained by comparing a 5-min recording of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) output against the Zeriscope platform data. Results: Compared with the ECG device, the Zeriscope device had a concordance coefficient (rc) of 0.16, falling below the standard deemed to represent acceptable accuracy in HR measurement (i.e., 0.80). Follow-up analyses excluding outliers did not significantly improve the concordance coefficient to an acceptable standard for the total participant sample. System Usability Survey responses showed that participants rated the Zeriscope system as easy to use and something that most people would learn to use quickly. Conclusions: This study demonstrated promise in ambulatory HRV measurement in a representative military TBI sample. Future research should include further refinement of such ambulatory devices to meet the specifications required for use in a military active-duty TBI population.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Military Personnel , Wearable Electronic Devices , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Heart Rate , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic , Pilot Projects
3.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 84(11): 923-934, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27599225

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evidence of feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of home-based telebehavioral health (HBTBH) needs to be established before adoption of HBTBH in the military health system can occur. The purpose of this randomized controlled noninferiority trial was to compare the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of HBTBH to care provided in the traditional in-office setting among military personnel and veterans. METHOD: One hundred and twenty-one U.S. military service members and veterans were recruited at a military treatment facility and a Veterans Health Administration hospital. Participants were randomized to receive 8 sessions of behavioral activation treatment for depression (BATD) either in the home via videoconferencing (VC) or in a traditional in-office (same room) setting. Participants were assessed at baseline, midtreatment (4 weeks), posttreatment (8 weeks), and 3 months posttreatment. RESULTS: Mixed-effects modeling results with Beck Hopelessness Scale and Beck Depression Inventory II scores suggested relatively strong and similar reductions in hopelessness and depressive symptoms for both groups; however, noninferiority analyses failed to reject the null hypothesis that in-home care was no worse than in-office treatment based on these measures. There were not any differences found between treatment groups in regards to treatment satisfaction. Safety procedures were successfully implemented, supporting the feasibility of home-based care. CONCLUSION: BATD can be feasibly delivered to the homes of active duty service members and veterans via VC. Small-group differences suggest a slight benefit of in-person care over in-home telehealth on some clinical outcomes. Reasons for this are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Military Personnel/psychology , Telemedicine/methods , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Home Care Services , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 31(10): 1206-11, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27170304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is associated with increased health care utilization, medical morbidity, and tobacco and alcohol use. Consequently, screening for PTSD has become increasingly common in primary care clinics, especially in Veteran healthcare settings where trauma exposure among patients is common. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to revise the Primary Care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD) to reflect the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for PTSD (PC-PTSD-5) and to examine both the diagnostic accuracy and the patient acceptability of the revised measure. DESIGN: We compared the PC-PTSD-5 results with those from a brief psychiatric interview for PTSD. Participants also rated screening preferences and acceptability of the PC-PTSD-5. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 398 Veterans participated in the study (response rate = 41 %). Most of the participants were male, in their 60s, and the majority identified as non-Hispanic White. MEASURES: The PC-PTSD-5 was used as the screening measure, a modified version of the PTSD module of the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to diagnose DSM-5 PTSD, and five brief survey items were used to assess acceptability and preferences. KEY RESULTS: The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.941; 95 % C.I.: 0.912- 0.969). Whereas a cut score of 3 maximized sensitivity (κ[1]) = 0.93; SE = .041; 95 % C.I.: 0.849-1.00), a cut score of 4 maximized efficiency (κ[0.5] = 0.63; SE = 0.052; 95 % C.I.: 0.527-0.731), and a cut score of 5 maximized specificity (κ[0] = 0.70; SE = 0.077; 95 % C.I.: 0.550-0.853). Patients found the screen acceptable and indicated a preference for administration by their primary care providers as opposed to by other providers or via self-report. CONCLUSIONS: The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated strong preliminary results for diagnostic accuracy, and was broadly acceptable to patients.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Preference , Sensitivity and Specificity , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
5.
Telemed J E Health ; 21(8): 652-60, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25885491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there is growing empirical support for the clinical efficacy of telemental health (TMH) treatments, questions remain about how patient perceptions of the TMH treatment process may compare with those of traditional in-person psychotherapy treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a systematic review, we specifically examine measures of patient treatment satisfaction and therapeutic alliance in studies that included direct comparisons of video teleconferencing or telephone-based psychotherapeutic TMH treatments with in-person treatment delivery. We performed a comprehensive search of the PsychINFO and MEDLINE databases for articles published in the last 10 years (2004-2014) on TMH treatments that included in-person comparison groups, yielding 552 initial results with 14 studies meeting our full inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The findings generally show comparable treatment satisfaction as well as similar ratings of therapeutic alliance. Some results suggested the potential for decreased patient comfort with aspects of group treatment delivered via TMH. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss implications for providing psychotherapeutic treatments via TMH and review practice recommendations for assuring and enhancing satisfaction with TMH services.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Telemedicine/methods , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Psychotherapy , Remote Consultation , Telephone , Videoconferencing
6.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 38(1): 134-44, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24747488

ABSTRACT

Home-based telemental health (TMH) treatments have the potential to address current and future health needs of military service members, veterans, and their families, especially for those who live in rural or underserved areas. The use of home-based TMH treatments to address the behavioral health care needs of U.S. military healthcare beneficiaries is not presently considered standard of care in the Military Health System. The feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of home-based TMH treatments must be established before broad dissemination of home-based treatment programs can be implemented. This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a clinical trial that compares in-office to home-based Behavioral Activation for Depression (BATD) treatment delivered via web-based video technology for service members and veterans with depression. This grant funded three-year randomized clinical trial is being conducted at the National Center for Telehealth and Technology at Joint-base Lewis-McChord and at the Portland VA Medical Center. Best practice recommendations regarding the implementation of in-home telehealth in the military setting as well as the cultural and contextual factors of providing in-home care to active duty and veteran military populations are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Depression/therapy , Military Personnel , Research Design , Telemedicine/methods , Veterans , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL