Anterior plaque brachytherapy placement for treatment of iris and iridociliary melanomas - Surgical procedure and institutional experience.

Surgical placement of eye plaque brachytherapy (EPB) is the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanomas, including iris/iridociliary melanomas. However, unique challenges exist in anterior EPB placement. Here, we describe a surgical technique for anterior EPB placement when placement requires plaque positioning onto the cornea. Blunt conjunctival peritomy exposes the sclera overlying the tumor. A "dummy" plaque is placed, with positioning confirmed by direct visualization. The amniotic membrane is draped across the cornea and anchored with the eyelet sutures, the plaque is placed overlying the membrane, the conjunctiva is closed over the plaque, and a temporary tarsorrhaphy is performed. One week later, the conjunctival incision is reopened for plaque/amniotic membrane removal. This technique was employed in the treatment of 12 iris/iridociliary melanomas at our institution, with no instances of corneal damage. In placing an anterior plaque, employing this technique allows appropriate cancer treatment while optimizing patient comfort and corneal integrity.

Outpatient ocular brachytherapy: The USC Experience.

PURPOSE: Ocular brachytherapy is a standard-of-care surgical procedure for globe salvage in the treatment of uveal melanoma. The procedure involves the placement and subsequent removal of a radioactive plaque several days later. At many locations, patients are admitted on an inpatient basis until plaque removal due to radiation safety concerns. However, patients may be discharged to home after plaque insertion, and subsequently return to the medical facility for plaque removal. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and systematic financial benefit of the outpatient ocular brachytherapy program at "?>the University of Southern California (USC) Roski Eye Institute for 30 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institution retrospective record review was performed on all 275 patients who underwent brachytherapy for ocular tumors between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2019 to assess for occurrences of reportable radiation and/or patients safety events. The treatment protocols at our institution are described. Data on hospital-adjusted expenses per inpatient day from the American Hospital Association's 2018 Annual Survey were used as a proxy for costs to patients and the health care system to perform a cost-benefit analysis comparing outpatient versus inpatient brachytherapy. RESULTS: Of the 275 plaque procedures over a 30-year period that were reviewed, there were no internally or externally reportable patient or radiation safety events. There were no adverse events related to patient transportation to the hospital, the patient not returning for plaque removal, operative issues in removing the plaque on time due to cancelled or delayed cases, or loss of radioactive material. Additionally, our cost-benefit analysis estimates that outpatient brachytherapy reduced costs for USC's patients in 2018 by an average of $24,722 per patient treated with ocular brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate measures, outpatient ocular brachytherapy allows patients to safely return home with the added benefit of decreased financial burden for both patients and the broader health care system.

Residency Match Trends, Racial Disparity, and Matching Amid a Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Radiation oncology has been facing an evolving crisis in recruitment for several years, and the events of 2020 to 2021 will certainly add to that crisis with the urgency of addressing systemic racial injustice amid a global pandemic. The purpose of this study is to examine applicant data to gain insight on residency match trends and evaluate these findings within the backdrop of a novel match year. METHODS AND MATERIALS: National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) data between 2009 and 2020 were assessed for the number of applicants, programs, and positions available, number of ranked applicants needed to fill positions, and successfully matched applicant data. Additionally, Electronic Residency Application Service data were evaluated for race/ethnicity identification among applicants. RESULTS: The number of applicants who ranked radiation oncology as their preferred specialty has declined for 3 consecutive years from 223 in 2017 to 155 in 2020. In 2020 the applicant-to-position ratio was at an all-time low at 0.82, and the unmatched position rate increased to 18.5%. The percentage of Black or African American applicants applying to radiation oncology has also declined to 4.9%, and this population represents 7.2% of all applicants. The number of ranked applicants needed to fill the available radiation oncology PGY2 positions increased from 4.0 in 2010 to 6.0 in 2020. CONCLUSION: Declining interest in radiation oncology among applicants, and an even further decline of black applicants, along with the challenges of interview and travel restrictions during the pandemic provide heightened concern for this year's match. Innovative efforts to expand the reach of radiation oncology to prospective applicants is needed to engage diverse, bright, and committed students for the continued progress of radiation oncology and most importantly, our patients.

Accreditation Program for Excellence (APEx): A Catalyst for Quality Improvement.

PURPOSE: In 2014 the American Society for Radiation Oncology's Accreditation Program for Excellence (APEx) was created in response to the Target Safely campaign. APEx is a powerful tool to measure and drive quality improvement in radiation oncology practices. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A task group from the American Society for Radiation Oncology's Practice Accreditation Committee was formed to provide an overview of the APEx accreditation program including analysis from specific program data. RESULTS: Through initiatives encouraged by the APEx program, participants are able to evaluate teamwork and effectiveness, implement documented procedures aimed at improving quality and safety, and establish quality management at the practice. The program's Self-Assessment measures performance with program requirements and indicates where compliance lacks standardization. Methods to address these deficiencies form part of on-going quality improvement. These quality outcomes promote the delivery of safe, high-quality care. CONCLUSION: The accreditation process through APEx is a commitment to an ongoing safety culture. Any worthwhile accreditation program should provide a meaningful assessment of practice operations, supply the tools to identify deficiencies and provide the opportunity to showcase growth and development. A commitment to completing APEx is a commitment to excellence for patients and all those who care for them.

Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma with Iodine-125 Plaque Brachytherapy: Ocular Oncology Study Consortium Report 5.

BACKGROUND: Treatment planning for I-125 plaque therapy for uveal melanoma has advanced significantly since the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study trial, with more widely available image-guided planning and improved dosimetry. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated real-world practice patterns for I-125 plaque brachytherapy in the United States by studying practice patterns at centers that comprise the Ocular Oncology Study Consortium (OOSC). METHODS: The OOSC database and responses to a treatment practice survey were evaluated. The database contains treatment information from 9 institutions. Patients included in the database were treated between 2010 and 2014. The survey was conducted in 2018 and current treatment planning methods and prescriptions were queried. RESULTS: Examination of the OOSC database revealed that average doses to critical structures were highly consistent, with the exception of one institution. Survey responses indicated that most centers followed published guidelines regarding dose and prescription point. Dose rate ranged from 51 to 118 cGy/h. As of 2018, most institutions use pre-loaded plaques and fundus photographs and/or computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in planning. CONCLUSIONS: While there were differences in dosimetric practices, overall agreement in plaque brachytherapy practices was high among OOSC institutions. Clinical margins and planning systems were similar among institutions, while prescription dose, dose rates, and dosimetry varied.

Identifying Disparities in Care in Treating Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients Treated at a Safety-net Versus Private Hospital Setting.

BACKGROUND: Patients of lower socioeconomic status (SES) may experience barriers to their oncologic care, but current data conflict over whether SES affects the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GB). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether SES disparities impaired delivery of neuro-oncologic care and affected the prognosis of GB patients. METHODS: The records of GB patients treated from 2010 to 2014 at a safety-net hospital (SNH) or private hospital (PH), both served by 1 academic medical institution, were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 55 SNH and 39 PH GB patients were analyzed with median 11-month follow-up. SNH patients were predominantly Hispanic, low income, enrolled in Medicaid, were less likely to receive radiation (89% vs. 100%), took longer to start radiation (41 vs. 29 days), and were less likely to complete radiation treatment (80% vs. 95%). Concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide use were also lower (85% vs. 94% and 60% vs. 71%, respectively). OS and PFS were not significantly different (15 vs. 16 months and 8 vs. 11 months, respectively). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and RT completion predicted for better OS, whereas hospital type, income, and insurance did not. CONCLUSION: Although GB patients at our SNH received less adjuvant treatment compared with PH, outcomes were similar. Access to multidisciplinary care staffed by academic physicians may play an important role in overcoming socioeconomic barriers to treatment availability and quality at SNHs.

Quantifying Subclinical and Longitudinal Microvascular Changes Following Episcleral Plaque Brachytherapy Using Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

PURPOSE: To assess longitudinal microvascular changes in eyes treated with I-125 episcleral plaque brachytherapy (EPB). METHODS: High resolution OCT angiograms of the central 3×3mm macula were obtained from I-125 episcleral plaque brachytherapy treated and untreated fellow eyes of 61 patients. Capillary density (vessel skeleton density, VSD) and caliber (vessel diameter index, VDI) were quantified using previously validated semi-automated algorithms. Nonperfusion was also quantified as flow impairment regions (FIR). Exams from treated and fellow eyes obtained pre-treatment and at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year intervals were compared using generalized estimating equation linear models. Dosimetry maps were used to evaluate spatial correlation between radiation dose and microvascular metrics. RESULTS: At 6 months, treated eyes had significantly lower VSD (0.145 ± 0.003 vs 0.155 ± 0.002; p = 0.009) and higher FIR (2.01 ± 0.199 vs 1.46 ± 0.104; p = 0.010) compared to fellow eyes. There was a significant decrease in VSD and a corresponding increase in FIR even for treated eyes without clinically identifiable retinopathy at 6 months. VDI was significantly higher in treated eyes than in fellow eyes at 2 years (2.92 ± 0.025 vs 2.84 ± 0.018; p < 0.001). When our cohort was categorized into low dose radiation (<15Gy) and high dose radiation (>45Gy) to the fovea, there were significant differences in VSD and FIR between groups. CONCLUSIONS: OCTA can be used to quantify and monitor EPB induced retinopathy, and can detect vascular abnormalities even in the absence of clinically observable retinopathy. OCTA may therefore be useful in investigating treatment interventions that aim to delay EPB-induced radiation retinopathy.

Patient-reported outcomes of the relative severity of side effects from cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: It is not known which side effects (SEs) cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) perceive as worse than others. Our objectives were to (1) identify the worst SEs in patients receiving definitive RT-predominant treatment using patient-reported outcomes and (2) investigate the prominence of physical SEs relative to psychosocial SEs. METHODS: In a single-center outpatient radiation oncology clinic, patients were surveyed on the final day of definitive RT. Sixty-seven cards listed SEs (40 physical and 27 psychosocial), and patients ranked the five most severe. Fifteen points were assigned to the top five selected SEs with descending scores of 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients completed ≥ 4 weeks of RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy and had not received ≥ 4 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with head and neck and pelvis cancers perceived physical SEs as worse relative to psychosocial SEs; physical SEs filled 78% and 69% of the 15 points, respectively. In breast cancer patients, however, psychosocial SEs filled 45% of the 15 points in breast cancer patients (anxiety, depression, and sequelae), compared to 25% in others (P = 0.007). Affects my work, home duties, a SE not associated with the treatment itself, was the most frequently cited psychosocial SE (20% of cohort) and was ranked ninth overall. CONCLUSION: Perceptions of SEs of cancer RT are dominated by physical quality of life (QoL) concerns and are influenced by the anatomic area receiving RT. Psychosocial QoL concerns are significantly more frequent in breast cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02978846.

The Cancer Bell: Too Much of a Good Thing?

PURPOSE: Patients around the world often ring a bell on the final day of radiation therapy (RT) to celebrate treatment completion. Patients appear to enjoy ringing the bell, but its psychological impact is unexamined. Applying a psychological principle named the "peak-end rule," we hypothesized that ringing the bell would improve patients' perceptions of the overall distress from cancer treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled 2 cohorts of patients completing definitive RT in a single-center outpatient radiation oncology clinic. Patients in the control arm completed treatment and filled out the survey mentioned below. A bell was then installed in the clinic, and patients in the intervention arm rang the bell on the final day of RT and filled out the same survey. Patients evaluated their overall distress from cancer treatment using a survey composed of an 11-point numerical rating scale in combination with the Verbal Rating Scale. At follow-up, a shorter survey was completed that asked the same questions about distress from cancer treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients were enrolled, 107 in the bell group and 103 in the control group. One hundred sixty-three patients completed follow-up surveys, n = 86 (80%) and n = 77 (75%) in the bell and control groups, respectively. Demographics and treatment characteristics were well balanced. The bell group reported worse overall distress scores than those not ringing the bell (mean [standard deviation] 5.6 [2.8] vs 4.7 [2.7], P = .045). This difference worsened further at follow-up (6.4 [2.9] vs 5.1 [3.0], P = .009; mean 103 vs 130 days, P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Counter to our hypothesis, ringing the bell on the final day of RT worsens patients' evaluation of overall distress from cancer treatment, and this distress persists and even worsens in the months after treatment. Emotional arousal created by ringing the bell may magnify the distress from cancer treatment and subsequently worsen the perception of distress from treatment.

Trends in Radiation Practices for Female Ocular Oncologists in North America: A Collaborative Study of the International Society of Ocular Oncology.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the known radiation exposure, attitudes, and consequent risk modifications among female ocular oncologists in North America who routinely administer radioactive plaque brachytherapy treatment and are members of the International Society of Ocular Oncology. METHODS: Nineteen female ocular oncologists completed an anonymous 17-question radiation exposure survey. RESULTS: Eleven of the participants chose to routinely wear lead protection during surgery; 8 did not. Fifteen of 19 participants reported using an unloaded "nonactive" template to prepare for plaque implantation. During pregnancy, 11 of 13 participants continued to perform plaque brachytherapy. Eight of these 11 undertook measures to decrease radiation exposure self-reported as lead wear and other. The average reported anxiety regarding fertility was 2.1 (SD, 2.2) on a scale from 1 to 10. CONCLUSION: This study corroborates prior literature that surgeons' exposure to radiation during plaque brachytherapy is minimal. Nonetheless, there remains some anxiety regarding exposure risk to women, due to potential effects on fertility and fetal health. We found variability in exposure monitoring, required training, and precautions during pregnancy amongst this group of surgeons. Improved education and clearer pregnancy guidelines may equip female ocular oncologists with optimal knowledge regarding risk of radiation exposure.

Phase 1 Trial of SBRT to the Prostate Fossa After Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (within 10 weeks after treatment) associated with increasing hypofractionation to the prostate fossa (PF). We hypothesized that escalating the dose per fraction (fx) to the PF would have acceptable toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tested dose levels (DLs) were 3.6 Gy × 15 fx (DL1); 4.7 Gy × 10 fx (DL2); and 7.1 Gy × 5 fx (DL3). Escalation followed a 6 + 6 rules-based design with 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade (G) ≥3, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with indications for adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy (RT) enrolled (6 at DL1 and 2; 12 at DL3). All patients had at least 6 months of follow-up (median follow-up, 14.1 months). Four patients received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. No G ≥ 3 GI or GU toxicity was seen at any DL; 2 of 6 patients in the DL1 group, 3 of 6 in DL2, and 7 of 12 in DL3 experienced G2 GI toxicity during RT. Except in 1 patient, all acute G2 GI toxicity resolved by 10 weeks. Three of 12 patients reported an increase to G1 and G2 GU toxicity in the 2 weeks after RT in groups DL1 and DL2 and 1 of 12 patients in DL3. At week 2 after RT, decline in the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel domain met criteria for a minimally important difference in 71% of patients. At week 10, 1 of 6, 2 of 6, and 7 of 11 patients at DLs 1, 2, and 3, respectively, still met minimally important difference criteria. International Prostate Symptom Scores worsened 2 weeks after treatment but improved by 6 to 10 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation up to 7.1 Gy × 5 fx to the PF was completed without acute G ≥ 3 toxicity. There was transient G2 rectal toxicity at all DLs during and immediately after RT. We must perform long-term follow-up and assessment of late toxicity of SBRT to the PF.

Outcomes of choroidal melanomas treated with eye physics plaques: A 25-year review.

PURPOSE: To review long-term outcomes of the University of Southern California Plaque Simulator (PS) software and Eye Physics (EP) plaques. We hypothesize that the PS/EP system delivers lower doses to critical ocular structures, resulting in lower rates of radiation toxicity and favorable visual outcomes compared to Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study plaques, while maintaining adequate local tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of 133 patients treated for choroidal melanoma with 125I brachytherapy, using PS software and EP plaques, from 1990 through 2015. A dose of 85 Gy at a rate of 0.6 Gy/h was prescribed to the tumor apex (with a typical margin of 2 mm) over 7 days. Primary outcomes were local tumor recurrence, globe salvage, and metastasis. Secondary outcomes were changes in visual acuity and radiation complications. RESULTS: With median followup of 42 months, 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated rates for tumor control, globe salvage, and metastatic-free survival were 98.3%, 96.4%, and 88.2%, respectively. Median doses to the macula and optic nerve were 39.9 Gy and 30.0 Gy, respectively. Forty-three percent of patients developed radiation retinopathy, and 20% developed optic neuropathy; 39% lost ≥6 Snellen lines of vision. CONCLUSIONS: The PS/EP system is designed to improve the accuracy and conformality of the radiation dose, creating a steep dose gradient outside the melanoma to decrease radiation to surrounding ocular structures. We report favorable rates of local tumor control, globe salvage, metastases, and radiation complications when compared to the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study and other studies. Overall, the PS/EP system results in excellent tumor control and appears to optimize long-term visual and radiation-related outcomes after brachytherapy.

Safety-net versus private hospital setting for brain metastasis patients treated with radiosurgery alone: Disparities in follow-up care and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone is an increasingly accepted treatment for brain metastases, but it requires adherence to frequently scheduled follow-up neuroimaging because of the risk of distant brain metastasis. The effect of disparities in access to follow-up care on outcomes after SRS alone is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 brain metastasis patients treated consecutively with SRS alone from 2010 through 2016 at an academic medical center and a safety-net hospital (SNH) located in Los Angeles, California. Outcomes included neurologic symptoms, hospitalization, steroid use and dependency, salvage SRS, salvage whole-brain radiotherapy, salvage neurosurgery, and overall survival. RESULTS: Ninety-three of the 153 patients were private hospital (PH) patients, and 60 were SNH patients. The median follow-up time was 7.7 months. SNH patients received fewer follow-up neuroimaging studies (1.5 vs 3; P = .008). In a multivariate analysis, the SNH setting was a significant risk factor for salvage neurosurgery (hazard ratio [HR], 13.65; P < .001), neurologic symptoms (HR, 3.74; P = .002), and hospitalization due to brain metastases (HR, 6.25; P < .001). More clinical visits were protective against hospitalizations due to brain metastases (HR, 0.75; P = .002), whereas more neuroimaging studies were protective against death (HR, 0.65; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SNH patients with brain metastases treated with SRS alone had fewer follow-up neuroimaging studies and were at higher risk for neurologic symptoms, hospitalization for brain metastases, and salvage neurosurgery in comparison with PH patients. Clinicians should consider the practice setting and patient access to follow-up care when they are deciding on the optimal strategy for the treatment of brain metastases. Cancer 2018;124:167-75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Use of the Toric Surgical Marker to Aid in Intraoperative Plaque Placement for the USC Eye Physics Plaques to Treat Uveal Melanoma: A New Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To describe a new surgical technique for intraoperative placement of Eye Physics (EP) plaques for uveal melanoma using a toric marker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A toric marker is designed for cataract surgery to align the axis of astigmatism; its use was modified in this protocol to mark the axis of suture coordinates as calculated by Plaque Simulator (PS) software. RESULTS: The toric marker can be used to localize suture coordinates, in degrees, during intraoperative plaque placement. Linear marking using the toric marker decreases potential inaccuracies associated with the surgeon estimating 'clock-hours' by dot placement. CONCLUSION: Use of the toric marker aided surgical placement of EP plaques. The EP planning protocol is now designed to display the suture coordinates either by clock-hours or degrees, per surgeon preference. Future research is necessary to determine whether routine use of the toric marker improves operative efficiency. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46:866-870.].

Radiation-Associated Toxicities in Obese Women with Endometrial Cancer: More Than Just BMI?

PURPOSE: The study characterizes the impact of obesity on postoperative radiation-associated toxicities in women with endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study identified 96 women with EC referred to a large urban institution's radiation oncology practice for postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) and/or intracavitary vaginal brachytherapy (ICBT). Demographic and clinicopathologic data were obtained. Toxicities were graded according to RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 11 years (median 2 years). Data were analyzed by χ(2), logistic regression, and recursive partitioning analyses. RESULTS: 68 EC patients who received WPRT and/or ICBT were analyzed. Median age was 52 years (29-73). The majority were Hispanic (71%). Median BMI at diagnosis was 34.5 kg/m(2) (20.5-56.6 kg/m(2)). BMI was independently associated with radiation-related cutaneous (p = 0.022) and gynecologic-related (p = 0.027) toxicities. Younger women also reported more gynecologic-related toxicities (p = 0.039). Adjuvant radiation technique was associated with increased gastrointestinal- and genitourinary-related toxicities but not gynecologic-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing BMI was associated with increased frequency of gynecologic and cutaneous radiation-associated toxicities. Additional studies to critically evaluate the radiation treatment dosing and treatment fields in obese EC patients are warranted to identify strategies to mitigate the radiation-associated toxicities in these women.

Outcomes of medium choroidal melanomas treated with ruthenium brachytherapy guided by three-dimensional pretreatment modeling.

PURPOSE: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) established iodine-125 (I-125) plaque brachytherapy for eye preserving treatment of medium-sized choroidal melanomas in the United States. Eye Physics I-125 plaque treatment modeled with Plaque Simulator (PS) software yields similar results to COMS. Herein, we report results from a series of 15 patients treated with ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy using PS pretreatment modeling for plaque localization and dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with medium-sized choroidal melanomas (2.84-5.5 mm in apical height and a basal diameter of 7.8-12.6 mm) treated with ruthenium brachytherapy from 2003 to 2005 were evaluated retrospectively. Baseline and followup data were evaluated for tumor height, best corrected visual acuity, radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, postradiation cataract formation, diplopia, and ptosis. Tumor response for both Ru-106 and I-125 plaques planned using the same PS pretreatment modeling was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Isotope-specific radiation profiles were compared, and rates of local treatment failure (0%), optic neuropathy (6.7%), retinopathy (20%), and cataracts (33%) were evaluated. Five year-treated tumor heights were approximately 0.61 ± 0.29 (I-125, n = 16) and 0.53 ± 0.17 (Ru-106, n = 6) of their heights at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This patient subset had background characteristics very similar to those of the COMS and patients treated at our institution with I-125 plaques. Treatment response was equivalent although radiation complications occurred slightly less frequently in the Ru-106 group compared with those treated with I-125. Image-guided three-dimensional pretreatment modeling for plaque localization and dosimetry seems to work equally as well for Ru as for I-125 plaques and justifies more extensive investigation.

Induction docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil precludes definitive chemoradiotherapy in a substantial proportion of patients with head and neck cancer in a low socioeconomic status population.

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective study we evaluate the tolerability and outcomes after induction chemotherapy for patients with predominately low socioeconomic status (SES) with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients with LAHNC of the hypopharynx, larynx, oral cavity, or oropharynx began curative intent therapy with induction cisplatin (75 or 100 mg/m), docetaxel (75 mg/m), and 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m×5 d or 1000 mg/m×4 d; continuous infusion) every 3 weeks (DPF) for a planned 2 to 3 cycles. All patients were to receive curative radiotherapy with concurrent systemic therapy. Associations were tested using χ test, and survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Most patients (75.4%) were of low SES. Induction DPF was delivered for a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 3) and 14% of the patients (n=17) died during induction DPF. After DPF, 38.2% of patients were unable to complete or receive planned definitive therapy. Overall 15.3% of patients died during therapy, and mortality was associated with a Karnofsky performance status <80 (P=0.04). At 2 years the locoregional control was 52.7%, whereas the distant metastases free rate was 72.6%, and the overall survival rate was 34.1%. Low SES patients were less likely to achieve locoregional control (P=0.05) or survive (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of LAHNC patients of low SES with a high tumor burden and poor performance status, use of induction DPF was associated with 15.3% mortality during therapy and precluded 38.2% of patients from initiating or completing planned definitive therapy.