Survival of revision ankle arthroplasty.

Aims: The number of revision total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) which are undertaken is increasing. Few studies have reported the survival after this procedure. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of revision ankle arthroplasties using large datasets. Secondary aims were to summarize the demographics of the patients, the indications for revision TAA, further operations, and predictors of survival. Methods: The study combined data from the National Joint Registry and NHS Digital to report the survival of revision TAA. We have previously reported the failure rates and risk factors for failure after TAA, and the outcome of fusion after a failed TAA, using the same methodology. Survival was assessed using life tables and Kaplan Meier graphs. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates. Results: A total of 228 patients underwent revision TAA. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years (SD 2.0). The mean time between the initial procedure and revision was 2.3 years (SD 1.8). The most commonly used implant was the Inbone which was used in 81 patients. A total of 29 (12.7%) failed; nine (3.9%) patients underwent a further revision, 19 (8.3%) underwent a fusion, and one (0.4%) had an amputation. The rate of survival was 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.6 to 97.5) at one year, 87.7% (95% CI 81.9 to 91.7; n = 124) at three years and 77.5% (95% CI 66.9 to 85.0; n = 57) at five years. Revision-specific implants had a better survival than when primary implants were used at revision. A total of 50 patients (21.9%) had further surgery; 19 (8.3%) underwent reoperation in the first 12 months. Cox regression models were prepared. In crude analysis the only significant risk factors for failure were the use of cement (hazard ratio (HR) 3.02 (95% CI 1.13 to 8.09)) and the time since the primary procedure (HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.97)). No risk factors for failure were identified in multivariable Cox regression modelling. Conclusion: Revision TAAs have good medium term survival and low rates of further surgery. New modular revision implants appear to have improved the survival compared with the use of traditional primary implants at revision.

Fusion after a failed primary total ankle arthroplasty.

Aims: When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can be converted to a fusion or a revision arthroplasty. Despite the increasing numbers of TAAs being undertaken, there is little information in the literature about the management of patients undergoing fusion following a failed TAA. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of fusions following a failed TAA using a large dataset from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Methods: A data linkage study combined NJR and NHS Digital data. Failure of a TAA was defined as a fusion, revision to a further TAA, or amputation. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to record survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare the rates of failure. Results: A total of 131 patients underwent fusion as a salvage procedure following TAA. Their mean age was 65.7 years (SD 10.6) and 73 (55.7%) were male. The mean follow-up was 47.5 months (SD 27.2). The mean time between TAA and fusion was 5.3 years (SD 2.7). Overall, 32 (24.4%) underwent reoperations other than revision and 29 (22.1%) failed. Of these 24 (18.3%) underwent revision of the fusion and five (3.8%) had a below-knee amputation. No patients underwent conversion to a further TAA. Failure usually occurred in the first three postoperative years with one-year survival of fusion being 96.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.7 to 98.3) and three-year survival in 69 patients being 77.5% (95% CI 68.3 to 84.4). Conclusion: Salvage fusion after a failed TAA shows moderate rates of failure and reoperations. Nearly 25% of patients required revision within three years. This study is an extension of studies using the same methodology reporting the failure rates and risk factors for failure, which have recently been published, and also one reporting the outcome of revision TAA for a failed primary TAA, using the same methodology, which will shortly be published.

Risk Factors for Failure of Total Ankle Replacements: A Data Linkage Study Using the National Joint Registry and NHS Digital.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing numbers of ankle replacements, there remains debate about which patients should undergo an ankle replacement, and there are limited studies analyzing risk factors for failure of an ankle replacement. The primary aim of this study is to analyze the risk factors for failure of total ankle replacements. METHODS: A data linkage study combining the National Joint Registry (NJR) Data and NHS (National Health Service) Digital data was performed. The primary outcome of failure is defined as the removal or exchange of any components of the implanted device. Kaplan-Meier survival charts were used to illustrate survivorship. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to analyze potential risk factors for failures or ankle replacements. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 90.2% (95% CI 89.2%-91.1%). In multivariable (adjusted) Cox regression models, only age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.97), body mass index (BMI; HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06), and underlying etiology (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97) were associated with an increased risk of failure. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that younger patients and those with an increased BMI have an increased risk of failure of a primary ankle replacement. We also show that rheumatoid patients have higher survivorship than those with osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

How long do ankle arthroplasties last?

Despite the increasing numbers of ankle arthroplasties, there are limited studies on their survival and comparisons between different implants. The primary aim of this study was to determine the failure rates of primary ankle arthroplasties commonly used in the UK. A data linkage study combined National Joint Registry (NJR) data and NHS Digital data. The primary outcome of failure was defined as the removal or exchange of any components of the implanted device. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier survival charts were used to illustrate survivorship. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2018. Overall, 5,562 primary ankle arthroplasties were recorded in the NJR. Linked data show a one-year survivorship of 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 98.4% to 99.0%), five-year survival in 2,725 patients of 90.2% (95% CI 89.2% to 91.1%), and ten-year survival in 199 patients of 86.2% (95% CI 84.6% to 87.6%). The five-year survival for fixed-bearing implants was 94.3% (95% CI 91.3% to 96.3%) compared to 89.4% (95% CI 88.3% to 90.4%) for mobile-bearing implants. A Cox regression model for all implants with over 100 implantations using the implant with the best survivorship (Infinity) as the reference, only the STAR (hazard ratio (HR) 1.60 (95% CI 0.87 to 2.96)) and INBONE (HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.05 to 2.84)) did not demonstrate worse survival at three and five years. Ankle arthroplasties in the UK have a five-year survival rate of 90.2%, which is lower than recorded on the NJR, because we have shown that approximately one-third of ankle arthroplasty failures are not reported to the NJR. There are statistically significant differences in survival between different implants. Fixed-bearing implants appear to demonstrate higher survivorship than mobile-bearing implants.

Total Talus Replacements.

Background: Total talus replacements are a surgical treatment for talar avascular necrosis (AVN) replacing the entire talus. The potential for total talus replacements has increased with the advent of patient-specific implants using 3D printing based on computed tomographic scanning of the ipsilateral or contralateral talus. The primary aim of this review is to summarize the literature on total talus replacements, providing a historical survey, indications, controversies, complications, survival, and functional outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was performed. Articles with survival of total talus replacements were included. Basic percentages and a critical review of the literature was performed. Results: Nine articles with 115 patients were included. The mean age ranged from 27.6 to 72 years, but with 5 studies having a mean age of <50 years. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.8 to 152 months. The most common indication was avascular necrosis in 67 patients (58%). Five studies used customized implants and 4 studies used 3D printing. Four studies used ceramic prostheses, 3 cobalt chromium, 1 stainless steel, and 1 titanium with ceramic surface. Three studies involved a talus replacement in conjunction with an ankle replacement. Postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 33%. Of 24 functional outcomes scores, 66.7% demonstrated significant improvement. Conclusion: Total talus replacements are a promising alternative to tibiotalocalcaneal fusion for patients with avascular necrosis of the talus; however, further studies are required to ensure reliable outcomes prior to widespread adoption of this technology. Level of Evidence: Level IV, review of case series.

Pulmonary Embolism, Mortality, and Medical Complications Following a Total Ankle Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is sparse data on the incidence of thromboembolic and medical complications following total ankle replacements. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as mortality and medical complications following ankle replacements. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using all levels of evidence following PRISMA guidelines. Of the 1657 articles identified, 25 met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were a primary total ankle replacement with the recording of medical complications and/or thromboembolic events and/or mortality data. Two reviewers independently reviewed all articles. Quantitative methods were used to pool the percentages with complications across studies. RESULTS: The pooled percentage with reported symptomatic deep vein thrombosis across 18 studies was 0.07% (95% CI 0.001%-0.59%). The pooled percentage with reported postoperative pulmonary embolism across 8 studies was 0.01% (95% CI 0.001%-0.03%). The pooled postoperative reported mortality was 0.06% (95% CI 0.001%-0.24%). Other medical complications had low incidences. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates rates of reported thromboembolic events of less than 1 in 1000. Notably the level of evidence analyzed was mainly Level III and IV, likely underestimating the true incidence of these events because of recall and medical record limitations, and we had insufficient information on usage of chemoprophylaxis among these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review based on all levels of evidence including case series.

The predictive value of vascular calcification on plain radiographs of the ankle to diagnose diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: There are nearly 500,000 people with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in the UK. A common complication of diabetes is vascular calcification. The incidental finding of vascular calcification on plain radiographs in patients with undiagnosed diabetes has the potential to alter patient management. We hypothesised that the presence of vascular calcification on plain radiographs of the foot may predict the diagnosis of diabetes and aimed to determine the positive predictive value of vascular calcification to diagnose diabetes. METHODS: A retrospective case control study compared 130 diabetic patients to 130 non-diabetic patients that were matched for age and gender. The presence of vascular calcification in anterior, posterior or plantar vessels was measured on plain radiographs. McNemar's Chi-squared test and positive predictive values were calculated. Conditional logistic regression models estimated the association between calcification and diabetes RESULTS: The overall mean age was 58.0 % and 31.5 % were females. 89.2 % of those with diabetes had calcification present, and 23.1 % in those who did not have diabetes had calcification. McNemar's test for independence gives p < 0.001. Calcification in both anterior and posterior vessels predicts diabetes with a positive predictive value of 91.2 % (95 % CI 76.9-97.0 %). The odds ratio for having diabetes is 78 (95 % CI: 7.8 - 784) times higher in a person who has calcification in the blood vessels of their ankle than in a person without calcification after adjusting for confounders CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that vascular calcification in the anterior and posterior blood vessels is over 90 % predictive of a diagnosis of diabetes. This screening test could be used in future clinics when interpreting radiographs, aiding in the diagnosis of diabetes and altering patient management.

The outcomes of revision surgery for a failed ankle arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed. RESULTS: Six papers analyzed all-cause reoperations of revision ankle arthroplasties, and 14 papers analyzed failures of conversion of a TAA to fusion. It was found that 26.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.4% to 40.1%) of revision ankle arthroplasties required further surgical intervention and 13.0% (95% CI 4.9% to 23.4%) of conversion to fusions; 14.4% (95% CI 8.4% to 21.4%) of revision ankle arthroplasties failed and 8% (95% CI 4% to 13%) of conversion to fusions failed. CONCLUSION: Revision of primary TAA can be an effective procedure with improved functional outcomes, but has considerable risks of failure and reoperation, especially in those with periprosthetic joint infection. In those who undergo conversion of TAA to fusion, there are high rates of nonunion. Further comparative studies are required to compare both operative techniques.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):596-606.

Subtalar Arthrodesis Union Rates With and Without Adjacent Ankle Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Subtalar arthrodesis is the surgical procedure commonly performed to treat subtalar arthritis. Subtalar arthrodesis may have a higher nonunion rate if there is a preexisting adjacent joint arthrodesis. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the subtalar arthrodesis union rate of patients with native tibiotalar joints to that of patients with prior tibiotalar arthrodesis. The secondary aim was to assess risk factors for nonunion. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients that underwent a subtalar arthrodesis in a single center between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome of union was determined based on bridging callus on radiographs and clinical symptoms. If there was uncertainty, then a nonweightbearing CT was acquired. Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney tests compared differences in demographics and risk factors for nonunion between groups. A logistical regression model was performed to determine risk factors for nonunion. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had an adjacent ankle arthrodesis and 53 patients did not. The successful subtalar arthrodesis union rate in those with a preexisting ankle joint arthrodesis (44.4%) was approximately half that in those without an ankle joint arthrodesis (86.8%) (P < .001). On multivariate logistic regression, an adjacent ankle arthrodesis was the only significant risk factor for nonunion. The odds ratio of nonunion of the subtalar joint with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis present was 4.90 (95% CI 1.02-23.56) compared to a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle joint. In addition, 9.4% of patients without an ankle arthrodesis underwent a revision subtalar arthrodesis compared with 44.4% of those with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis (P = .001). CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that patients undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis have a significantly increased risk of nonunion compared with those undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle. Patients with a previously fused ankle need counseling about the high risk of nonunion and potential additional surgery.

Avoidance of injury to the posterior neurovascular bundle during total ankle arthroplasty - A simple technical tip.

Iatrogenic nerve injury to the tibial nerve is a serious but avoidable complication of total ankle replacements and may be under-reported as it may go unrecognised or thought to be due to tarsal tunnel syndrome. The tibial nerve is particularly vulnerable during the saw cuts at the posteromedial corner without appropriate protection. Prior to drilling the tibial and talar pins of the adjustment block for the Infinity ankle replacement we perform a 2 cm incision behind the medial malleolus. The tibialis posterior tendon sheath is identified and incised. A periosteal elevator is used to develop a plane between the back of the tibia and the tibialis posterior tendon and then exchanged for a mini Hohmann retractor protecting the neurovascular bundle. This allows us to drill the pins and saw cuts safely. The Hohmann retractor can be felt at the tip of the saw blade providing reassurance that the blade is not too deep. Our technique has not previously been reported in the literature. It acts as a simple reproducible way of avoiding injury to structures at the back of the ankle joint.

Patient reported outcome measures in ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Compare the functional outcomes of comparative studies of ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle replacements (TAR). DESIGN: Systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases in July 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that directly compared TAR and AA which reported patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) of pain, function and quality of life. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently reviewed all papers. PROMs were allocated into pain, function or quality of life domains. Two summary statistics were created to allow for analysis of the PROMs. These statistics were the mean difference in post-operative score and the mean difference in the change of score. RESULTS: 1323 papers were assessed of which 20 papers were included. 898 ankle arthrodesis and 1638 ankle replacements were evaluated. The mean follow up was 3.3 years (range 0.5-13.0 years). AA patients had a mean age of 55.7 (range 20-82) and TAR 62.5 (range 21-89). There was major heterogeneity in outcomes used. We were unable to find a significant difference between the reported change in PROMs following TAR and AA. 29.3% of PROMs and their subscores showed TAR had better outcomes, 68.7% showed no significant difference and only 2.0% showed AA to have better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of published studies found equality in patient reported outcomes following TAR and AA although the quality of the studies was of low-level evidence. There is an urgent need for randomised controlled studies to definitively answer this important clinical question.

A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Functional Outcomes of Primary and Revision Ankle Replacements.

BACKGROUND: The number of ankle and revision ankle replacements performed is increasing. There is limited research into functional outcomes, especially in revision ankle replacements. The primary aim of this cohort study was to determine the functional improvements following primary and revision ankle replacements and compare which gave the greatest improvement in functional scores. METHODS: A single-center prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2015 and 2018. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Patients undertook a preoperative and 2-year Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MoxFQ) score. The Mann Whitney test was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 33 primary and 23 revision ankle replacements were performed between 2015 and 2018. The mean age was 69.3 years for primary replacements and 64.7 years for revision replacements. All primary replacements were the Infinity ankle replacement. Revision replacements were either the Inbone II or Invision. The indication for revision was 9 aseptic loosening, 6 infections, 5 cysts, and 3 malposition. Seventeen were performed as a single stage and 6 as a 2-stage revision. The overall MoxFQ improved by a mean of 48.8 for primaries and 20.2 for revisions (P = .024). The walking/standing domain improved by 57.5 for primaries and 22.5 for revisions (P = .016), the pain score improved by 43.0 and 32.3 (P = .009), and the social interaction improved by 40.0 and 11.7 (P = .128). CONCLUSION: Both primary and revision ankle replacements result in improved functional scores. In this relatively small cohort with the implants used, primary ankle replacements though have a significantly greater improvement in functional scores compared to revision ankle replacements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

A case series of mortality and morbidity in distal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures are occurring in increasing numbers. There is limited research into outcomes and mortality. This study aimed to assess the 1 year mortality and complications requiring further surgery in the two years following a presentation with a periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. A retrospective case series of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures at a single trauma centre was undertaken. All patients were included who presented with a distal femur periprosthetic fracture between 1st January and 2008 and 31st March 2015. 60 patients with 49 females and 11 males. Mean age was 80.7. Median time to surgery was 63 h 42 (70%) underwent open reduction internal fixation, 13 (21.7%) underwent revision arthroplasty and 5 (8.3%) underwent non-operative treatment. Median length of stay was 14 days. There were 12 (20%) complications requiring further surgery within 2 years. There were 2 (3.3%) deaths in 30 days and 8 (13.3%) within 1 year following fracture. Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures are becoming a common orthopaedic presentation. They occur in a complex group of patients and have high rates of mortality and complications.

Reliability of the commonly used classification systems for interprosthetic fractures.

OBJECTIVES: An interprosthetic fracture occurs between a hip and knee arthroplasty. There is currently no universally agreed classification. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the most commonly used interprosthetic fracture classifications. METHODS: Nineteen interprosthetic fractures were classified by four reviewers for inter- and intraobserver reliability. The most commonly used interprosthetic fracture classifications were the Soenen classification, Platzer classification, and Pires classification. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: A moderate interobserver reliability was found for all the classification systems. The Platzer classification had a kappa value of 0.586, the Pires classification 0.499, and Soenen classification 0.489. The intraobserver error was 0.767 for the Platzer classification (substantial agreement), 0.636 for the Pires classification (substantial agreement), and 0.318 for the Soenen classification (fair agreement). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated moderate interobserver reliability and substantial intraobserver reliability for both the Platzer and Pires classifications. This paper would recommend the use of either classification for interprosthetic fractures.

Outcome of surgical treatment of inter prosthetic fractures: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic fractures occur between a total knee replacement and a femoral stem of either a hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. The number of interprosthetic fractures will increase as the number of joint replacements rises. There is currently a paucity of literature looking at the outcomes of interprosthetic fractures. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to: (1) determine fracture union in patients following surgical treatment of a femoral interprosthetic fracture, (2) measure outcomes included mortality and complications. HYPOTHESIS: Favoring bone fixation instead of prosthetic revision gives an acceptable rate of reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all interprosthetic femoral fractures admitted to a tertiary trauma centre over a 7-year period. There were 24 patients (4 males and 20 females) with a mean age of 82.3 (65-98). The initial operative procedure was a total hip replacement (THR) and a total knee replacement (TKR) in 19 patients, one THR and revision TKR, four hip hemiarthroplasty and TKR. There were 23 cemented femoral stems, and 1 uncemented femoral stem. The median time to surgery was 84hours. The median length of hospital stay was 16 days. Nineteen patients underwent open reduction internal fixation and 1 of these used a strut graft. Two patients underwent revision knee replacements and 3 underwent a revision hip replacement. All patients had at least 2 years clinical follow-up. RESULTS: One patient died within 30 days of fracture, leaving 23 patients to assess bone union. Another patient died within 1 year of fracture. Three out of 24 patients (12.5%) suffered a complication that required further surgery. The fracture united in 19/23 (82.6%) of patients and the 2-year mortality rate was 5/24 (20.8%). DISCUSSION: Interprosthetic fractures are complex fractures occurring in elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Whenever possible bone fixation instead of prostehtic revision give a low rate of complication and reoperation. The surgical treatments are complex, but with a well-performed surgical technique and an adequate rehabilitation program can result in satisfactory outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Distal femoral fractures have many of the same challenges as hip fractures, but there has been limited research into outcomes following these. The aim of this study was to assess 30 day mortality following distal femoral fractures in comparison to hip fractures presenting to a single institution Secondary outcomes included risk factors for mortality, post-operative complications and union. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all distal femoral fragility fractures in patients over 65, and hip fractures over a 5 year period at a single institution. RESULTS: 88 distal femoral fractures and 2837 hip fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the distal femoral fractures there were 80 females and 8 males with a mean age of 82.4 (range 65-103). The mean age of the hip fractures was 83.7 (range 65-106) and there were 2066 females and 771 males. The overall 30 day mortality for hip fractures was 7.7% and was 9.1% for distal femoral fractures. The risk ratio was 1.1777(95% CI 0.6009-2.3080) (p = 0.6338). There was no significant difference in 30 day mortality between the two fracture types. Of the 88 distal femoral fractures 75 (85.2%) underwent open reduction internal fixation, 5 (5.7%) intramedullary nail and 8 (9.1%) conservative treatment. 11.4% suffered a medical complication. 9.1% patients required at least 1 further surgical procedure. The union rate was 94.3%. The 1 year mortality was 34.1%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in 30 day mortality between distal femoral and hip fractures. Distal femoral fractures occur in a complex group of patients that is similar to hip fractures. They have high mortality and complication rates.

A case series of patients change in mobility following a hip fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are common in the elderly population. It is currently believed that patients can expect to lose a level of mobility following a hip fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the pre- and post-treatment mobility of patients treated in our institution who had suffered a fracture neck of femur and identify the factors that could predict pre-operatively those patients who would suffer a deterioration in mobility after treatment. METHODS: Patients admitted to a large UK teaching hospital with a surgically treated neck of femur fracture were included between 2 April 2011 and 31 March 2014. Patient's mobility was assessed on admission and at 1 year following surgery. RESULTS: There were a total of 615 patients alive at 1 year. There were 142 males and 473 females with a mean age of 82.1 (range 47-100). On admission, 338 (55.0%) mobilised independently 52.2% had no change in their pre-fracture mobility at 1 year following their treatment. Age, a lower AMTS, a higher ASA and living in residential care were significant risk factors for not regaining their pre-fracture mobility. Sex and type of fracture were not associated with change in mobility. CONCLUSION: It is commonly stated that patients lose one level of mobility following a hip fracture. This case series demonstrates that over 50% of patients can expect to have the same level of mobility at 1 year post-surgery as they did previously.