Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ophthalmology ; 123(10): 2127-36, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506485

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of overminus spectacles in improving control of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN: Randomized, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 58 children aged 3 to <7 years with IXT. Eligibility criteria included a distance control score of 2 or worse (mean of 3 measures during a single examination) on a scale of 0 (exophoria) to 5 (constant exotropia) and spherical equivalent refractive error between -6.00 diopters (D) and +1.00 D. METHODS: Children were randomly assigned to overminus spectacles (-2.50 D over cycloplegic refraction) or observation (non-overminus spectacles if needed or no spectacles) for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was distance control score for each child (mean of 3 measures during a single examination) assessed by a masked examiner at 8 weeks. Outcome testing was conducted with children wearing their study spectacles or plano spectacles for the children in the observation group who did not need spectacles. The primary analysis compared mean 8-week distance control score between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance model that adjusted for baseline distance control, baseline near control, prestudy spectacle wear, and prior IXT treatment. Treatment side effects were evaluated using questionnaires completed by parents. RESULTS: At 8 weeks, mean distance control was better in the 27 children treated with overminus spectacles than in the 31 children who were observed without treatment (2.0 vs. 2.8 points, adjusted difference = -0.75 points favoring the overminus group; 2-sided 95% confidence interval, -1.42 to -0.07 points). Side effects of headaches, eyestrain, avoidance of near activities, and blur appeared similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a pilot randomized clinical trial, overminus spectacles improved distance control at 8 weeks in children aged 3 to <7 years with IXT. A larger and longer randomized trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of overminus spectacles in treating IXT, particularly the effect on control after overminus treatment has been discontinued.


Subject(s)
Exotropia/therapy , Eyeglasses , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Visual Acuity , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design , Exotropia/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J AAPOS ; 10(2): 168-72, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16678754

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine whether grating acuity in early childhood can be used as a predictor of letter recognition acuity in patients with albinism. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared the binocular grating acuities of children with albinism (30 at age 1, 29 at age 2, and 19 at age 3) to their letter recognition acuity at age 4-6 years. RESULTS: Mean binocular grating acuity was 2.0, 1.9, and 1.5 octaves below age matched norms at ages 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively (P<0.001 at all ages). Mean grating acuity at ages 1, 2, and 3 correlated moderately (r=0.458, 0.502, and 0.471, respectively; all with P<0.05) with mean binocular letter recognition acuity of the same children at ages 4-6. A subgroup analysis of 9 patients followed longitudinally showed strong correlation of binocular grating acuity at ages 1 and 2 with letter acuity (r=0.745, P=0.021; r=0.930, P<0.001, respectively) and moderate correlation at age 3 (r=0.685, P=0.042). In the larger group and the longitudinal subgroup, mean binocular grating acuity at ages 1 and 2 was worse than mean binocular letter recognition acuity at age 4-6 (paired-samples t-test, P<0.001). Mean binocular grating acuity at age 3 in both groups was not significantly different than mean binocular letter recognition acuity at age 4-6 (paired-samples t-test, P=0.790, 0.215, respectively). CONCLUSION: Parents should be informed that vision measured as grating acuity at age 3 provides an estimate of future letter recognition acuity in children with albinism.


Subject(s)
Albinism, Ocular/physiopathology , Albinism, Oculocutaneous/physiopathology , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Follow-Up Studies , Form Perception , Humans , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Vision Tests , Vision, Binocular/physiology
3.
J AAPOS ; 9(1): 22-5, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15729276

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The early detection and management of common pediatric ophthalmic problems is crucial to assure successful visual maturation and best potential for development of binocular vision. The referring physician plays a pivotal role in this process. This study was designed to investigate the prevailing referral patterns for common amblyogenic conditions in a defined geographic region. METHODS: We sent a short questionnaire to 300 pediatricians and 1500 family practitioners (FPs) in Minnesota, asking them to use a multiple choice system to indicate how long after diagnosis they would wait before referring a child to an ophthalmologist for exotropia, esotropia, ptosis, nystagmus, and abnormal red reflex. RESULTS: The response rate was 46.9% ( n = 117) for pediatricians and 17.9% ( n = 240) for FPs. Of respondents, 64.6% of pediatricians and 50.2% of FPs would refer patients with exotropia within 2 months of diagnosis ( P < 0.001). For esotropia, 58.8% of pediatricians would refer within 2 months, while 38.6% would wait up to 12 months. In comparison, 48.7% of FPs would refer sooner, while 47.9% would refer later. These differences in referral patterns for pediatricians and FPs were statistically significant ( P = 0.037). There was less variation for referral of ptosis, nystagmus, and abnormal red reflex. These referral patterns were unaffected by years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians referred patients with strabismus significantly more promptly than FPs. The majority of primary care providers (PCPs) appropriately timed their referrals for these amblyogenic conditions. However, many children continue to be referred late, underscoring the need for continued education of PCPs.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/diagnosis , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Amblyopia/therapy , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Family , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Ophthalmology ; 109(2): 324-7; discussion 328, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11825817

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To refine indications for primary posterior capsulotomy (PPC) in conjunction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation for cataract in childhood. DESIGN: Noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 1 to 13 years old who underwent cataract extraction with intent to preserve the posterior lens capsule and PCIOL implantation between January 1992 and December 1998 at a pediatric hospital. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to determine the frequency and timing of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after PCIOL surgery with preservation of an intact posterior capsule. Comparison of pseudophakic PCO rates for groups defined by age and several possible risk factors. Assessment of safety and efficacy for PPC with anterior vitrectomy performed through a limbal incision in cases where the posterior capsule could not be preserved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy or surgical membranectomy to treat PCO. RESULTS: PCO occurred in 40% of 30 eyes with intact posterior capsule. Mean follow-up duration was 22 months for eyes that had PCO develop and 24 months for those in which the posterior capsule remained clear. Laser capsulotomy was required for 64% of 14 eyes in the 1- to 6-year-old age range but for only 19% of 16 in the 6- to 13-year-old range (P < 0.05). Mean time from surgery to PCO was 7 months for the younger group and 13 months for the older group. A need for repeated capsulotomy (one eye) or membranectomy with anterior vitrectomy (two eyes) was found only in the younger age group. There was no association of PCO with trauma history, cataract type, residual lens cortex, IOL position, or postoperative fibrin clot. Final vision was possibly compromised as a result of PCO in one eye with amblyopia. None of 24 eyes in which PPC with anterior vitrectomy was performed out of intraoperative necessity before primary PCIOL implantation had secondary opacification develop. No reduction in postoperative vision was attributable to PPC. CONCLUSIONS: PPC seems to be advisable for children less than 6 years old when cataract extraction with PCIOL implantation is performed. Preservation of the posterior capsule remains appropriate for older children with pseudophakia.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract/etiology , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/pathology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects , Adolescent , Age Factors , Cataract/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Laser Therapy , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/surgery , Male , Pseudophakia/complications , Risk Factors , Safety , Time Factors , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...