ABSTRACT
Recent legislation mandates the documentation of appropriateness criteria consultation when ordering advanced imaging for Medicare patients to remain eligible for reimbursement. Implementation of imaging clinical decision support (CDS) is a solution adopted by many systems to automate compliance with the new requirements. This article is intended to help radiologists who are employed by, contracted with, or otherwise affiliated with systems planning to implement CDS in the near future and ensure that they are able to understand and contribute to the process wherever possible. It includes an in-depth discussion of the legislation, evidence for and against the efficacy of imaging CDS, considerations for selecting a CDS vendor, tips for configuring CDS in a fashion consistent with departmental goals, and pointers for implementation and change management.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical/classification , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/standards , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Medicare/standards , Radiology Information Systems/standards , Radiology/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiology Information Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , United StatesABSTRACT
Patient experience is an important component of the overall medical encounter. This paper explores how patient experience is measured and its role in radiology, including its impact on clinical outcomes and reimbursement. Although typically applied to safety and clinical outcomes, quality improvement methodology can also be used to drive improvement efforts centered on patient experience. Applying an established framework for patient-centered care to radiology, this paper provides a number of examples of projects that are likely to yield significant improvement in patient satisfaction measures.
Subject(s)
Patient Participation/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Radiology/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Organizational Objectives , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , United StatesABSTRACT
It is unclear whether neonates born to women with thrombocytopenia during pregnancy are themselves at increased risk for thrombocytopenia at birth. In the current retrospective study, platelet count reference ranges were developed for pregnant women according to trimester, and correlations were sought between the platelet counts of mothers at delivery and their neonates. During the study period, 92,518 platelet counts were recorded on 41,887 pregnant women. A progressive shift toward lower platelet counts in a similarly shaped histogram occurred during pregnancy, with the lower reference range (2.5 percentile) for platelets during the third trimester being 113 × 10(9)/L. Among 11,797 maternal-neonatal pairs following delivery, no correlation was observed between maternal and neonatal counts. However, if the mother's lowest count was <50 × 10(9)/L, the relative risk of any degree of thrombocytopenia in their neonate was 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 33.3) and the relative risk of severe neonatal thrombocytopenia was 7.8 (95% CI, 1.8 to 33.3). The results of the current study demonstrate that platelet counts >75 × 10(9)/L in pregnant women were not associated with an increased risk of neonatal thrombocytopenia, and maternal platelet counts of <50 × 10(9)/L were accompanied by an almost fivefold risk increase of neonatal thrombocytopenia.
