Effect of Vertebroplasty at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra and Upper Instrumented Vertebra +1 for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Comparative Matched-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare radiographic outcomes of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with or without 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty (PVP) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the vertebra 1 level proximal to the UIV. METHODS: This retrospective 1:2 matched-cohort comparative study enrolled 2 groups of patients undergoing ASD surgery, including 28 patients with PVP (PVP group) and 56 patients without PVP (non-PVP group), in 3 institutes between 2012 and 2015. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and proximal junctional fracture (PJFX). The secondary outcome measure were radiologic outcomes between PVP segments and non-PVP segments. RESULTS: Between the PVP group and non-PVP group, no significant differences were found in the incidence of PJK (13 [46.4%] vs. 26 [46.4%]; P = 1.000), PJF (11 [39.3%] vs. 18 [32.1%]; P = 0.516), and PJFX (11 [39.3%] vs. 18 [32.1%]; P = 0.516). The number of the PJFX segments was 16 and 33 in PVP segments and non-PVP segments, respectively. Until revision surgery or final follow-up, the PJFX had progressed in 24 non-PVP segments (82.7%), but not in PVP segments. The PJFX progression in all PVP segments stopped near the PVP mass at the final follow-up. Reoperation as a result of PJFX was performed in 1 patient (3.6%) and 8 patients (14.3%) in the PVP and non-PVP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVP at UIV and vertebra 1 level proximal to the UIV cannot prevent PJK, PJF, and PJFX; however, it plays a positive role by delaying their progression. Furthermore, PVP tends to lower the reoperation rate after PJFX in ASD surgery.

Total Deformity Angular Ratio as a Risk Factor for Complications after Posterior Vertebral Column Resection Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify whether the deformity angular ratio (DAR) influences the occurrence of complications after posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) and to establish the DAR cut-off value. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients undergoing PVCR from December 2010 to October 2016 were reviewed. The relationships between the total, sagittal, and coronal DAR and complications were assessed using receiver operator characteristics curves. The patients were divided into two groups according to a reference value based on the cut-off value of DAR. Demographic, surgical, radiological, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the patient demographic and surgical data between the groups. The cut-off values for the total DAR (T-DAR) and the sagittal DAR (S-DAR) were 20.2 and 16.4, respectively (p=0.018 and 0.010). Both values were significantly associated with complications (p=0.016 and 0.005). In the higher T-DAR group, total complications (12 vs. 21, p=0.042) and late-onset complications (3 vs. 9, p=0.036) were significantly correlated with the T-DAR. The number of patients experiencing complications (9 vs. 11, p=0.029) and the total number of complications (13 vs. 20, p=0.015) were significantly correlated with the S-DAR. Worsening intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was more frequent in the higher T-DAR group (2 vs. 4) than in the higher S-DAR group (3 vs. 3). There was no difference in neurological deterioration between the groups after surgery. CONCLUSION: Both the T-DAR and the S-DAR are risk factors for complications after PVCR. Those who had a T-DAR >20.2 or S-DAR >16.4 experienced a higher rate of complications after PVCR.

Relationship Between Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Fusion Surgery Involving 3 or More Levels.

BACKGROUND: T1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis (TS-CL) and cervical sagittal alignment reportedly affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery. There are no reports of a relationship between cervical alignment and patient outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) involving 3 or more levels. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and patient-reported HRQOL after ACDF involving 3 or more levels. METHODS: Thirty-three patients underwent ACDF involving 3 or more levels for cervical stenosis, cervical degenerative disorder, or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (February 2006-April 2015). Mean follow-up duration was 57.6 ± 33.2 months. Radiographic measurements included C0-2 lordosis, C2-7 lordosis, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between C2-7 lordosis and T1 slope (r = 0.581, P = 0.004), and between C2-7 lordosis and TS-CL (r = -0.579, P = 0.004). C2-7 lordosis, C2-7 SVA, and TS-CL had no significant correlations with NDI or VAS score after surgery. C2-7 SVA was not significantly different before and after surgery. Postoperative TS-CL (P = 0.01) and changes in T1 slope (P = 0.028) and TS-CL (P = 0.01) were significantly correlated with changes in NDI. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF surgery involving 3 or more levels under neutral supine position did not significantly change the postoperative cervical alignment, and thus may not significantly affect cervical alignment or HRQOL.

Bilateral Approach for Stent-assisted Coiling of Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms - Two Cases.

Aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are rarely encountered. In particular, due to frequent anatomic complexity and the presence of nearby critical structures, PICA origin aneurysms are difficult to treat. However, recent reports of anecdotal cases using advanced endovascular instruments and skills have made the results of endovascular treatment rather outstanding. PICA preservation is the key to a successful endovascular treatment, based on the premise that a PICA origin aneurysm is well occluded. To secure PICA flow, stenting into the PICA would be the best method, however, it is nearly impossible technically via the ipsilateral vertebral artery (VA) if the PICA arose at an acute angle from the sac. In such a case, a bilateral approach for stent-assisted coiling can be a creative method for achievement of two goals of both aneurysm occlusion and PICA preservation: ipsilateral approach for coil delivery and contralateral cross-over approach for stent delivery via a retrograde smooth path into the PICA.

Comparative clinical results of vertebroplasty using jamshidi® needle and bone void filler for acute vertebral compression fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is an effective treatment modality for management of osteoporotic compression fracture. However physicians sometimes have problems of high pressure in cement delivery and cement leakage when using Jamshidi® needle (JN). Bone void filler (BVF) has larger lumen which may possibly diminish these problems. This study aims to compare the radiologic and clinical outcome of JN and BVF for PVP. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were treated with PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) where 46 patients underwent PVP with JN needle and 82 patients with BVF. Radiologic outcome such as kyphotic angle and vertebral body height (VBH) and clinical outcome such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores were measured after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: In JN PVP group, mean of 3.26 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were injected and 4.07 cc in BVF PVP group (p<0.001). For radiologic outcome, no significant difference in kyphotic angle reduction was observed between two groups. Cement leakage developed in 6 patients using JN PVP group and 2 patients using BVF group (p=0.025). No significant difference in improvement of VAS score was observed between JN and BVF PVP groups (p=0.43). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of osteoporotic VCF, usage of BVF for PVP may increase injected volume of cement, easily control the depth and direction of PMMA which may reduce cement leakage. However, improvement of VAS score did not show difference between two groups. Usage of BVF for PVP may be an alternative to JN PVP in selected cases.