ABSTRACT
The effects of anesthetics on acute kidney injury (AKI) after spine surgery have not been evaluated fully. This study compared propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthetics in the development of AKI after spine surgery. This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent spine surgery between 2015 and 2019. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AKI. Additionally, after propensity score matching, the incidence of AKI was compared between TIVA and volatile groups. Of the 4473 patients, 709 were excluded and 3764 were included in the logistic regression. After propensity score matching, 766 patients from each group were compared, and we found that the incidence of AKI was significantly lower in the TIVA group (1% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk factors for postoperative AKI were male sex (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-3.06), hypertension (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.56-3.94), anemia (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.76-4.04), and volatile anesthetics (OR 4.69, 95% CI 2.24-9.84). Compared with volatile anesthetics, TIVA is associated with a reduced risk of AKI for patients who have undergone spine surgery.
ABSTRACT
The risk of neuromuscular blockade is certainly minimized by sugammadex in combination with monitoring. However, the effect of sugammadex-aided recovery on patients' satisfaction is unclear. This study compared the Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 score, which is a patient-reported outcome, in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the neostigmine or sugammadex groups. At the end of surgery, neostigmine or sugammadex was administered, and tracheal extubation was performed after confirmation of a train of four ratio ≥ 0.9. The QoR-15 questionnaire was administered at 1 day before surgery and on post-operative days (POD) 1 and 2. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score on POD 1. The secondary outcomes were the QoR-15 score on POD 2, modified Aldrete score, length of post-anesthetic care unit stay, post-operative pain, administration of anti-emetics, urinary retention, and length of hospital stay. No significant differences were found in QoR-15 scores on POD 1 (94.4 vs. 95.5, p = 0.87) or 2 (116.3 vs. 122, p = 0.33). Secondary outcomes were also comparable, with the exception of urinary retention (15.8% neostigmine vs. 2.6% sugammadex, p = 0.04). This study demonstrated that the quality of recovery was comparable between the neostigmine and sugammadex groups when reversal and tracheal extubation were performed in accordance with the current guidelines.