Assessment of Occupational Health Risks for Maintenance Work in Fabrication Facilities: Brief Review and Recommendations.

Background: This study focuses on assessing occupational risk for the health hazards encountered during maintenance works (MW) in semiconductor fabrication (FAB) facilities. Objectives: The objectives of this study include: 1) identifying the primary health hazards during MW in semiconductor FAB facilities; 2) reviewing the methods used in evaluating the likelihood and severity of health hazards through occupational health risk assessment (OHRA); and 3) suggesting variables for the categorization of likelihood of exposures to health hazards and the severity of health effects associated with MW in FAB facilities. Methods: A literature review was undertaken on OHRA methodology and health hazards resulting from MW in FAB facilities. Based on this review, approaches for categorizing the exposure to health hazards and the severity of health effects related to MW were recommended. Results: Maintenance workers in FAB facilities face exposure to hazards such as debris, machinery entanglement, and airborne particles laden with various chemical components. The level of engineering and administrative control measures is suggested to assess the likelihood of simultaneous chemical and dust exposure. Qualitative key factors for mixed exposure estimation during MW include the presence of safe operational protocols, the use of air-jet machines, the presence and effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation system, chamber post-purge and cooling, and proper respirator use. Using the risk (R) and hazard (H) codes of the Globally Harmonized System alongside carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic classifications aid in categorizing health effect severity for OHRA. Conclusion: Further research is needed to apply our proposed variables in OHRA for MW in FAB facilities and subsequently validate the findings.

Inactivation and removal of influenza A virus H1N1 during the manufacture of plasma derivatives.

Although transmission of pandemic influenza A virus H1N1 2009 is still occurring globally, little has been reported about how this outbreak has affected the safety of plasma derivatives. To evaluate the safety of plasma derivatives, dedicated virus clearance processes used during their production were investigated for their effectiveness in eliminating this virus of recent concern. In this study, influenza A virus H1N1 strain A/NWS/33 (H1N1) was chosen as a surrogate. H1N1 was completely inactivated by fraction IV fractionation as well as pasteurization during the manufacture of albumin. H1N1 was also effectively removed into the precipitate by fraction III fractionation and completely inactivated by low pH incubation as well as pasteurization during the manufacture of intravenous immunoglobulin. H1N1 was completely inactivated within 1 min of solvent/detergent treatment using 0.3% tri (n-butyl) phosphate and 1.0% Triton X-100 and also completely inactivated within 10 min of dry-heat treatment at 98 °C during the manufacture of factor VIII. H1N1 was completely removed by virus filtration process using Viresolve NFP filter and also completely inactivated by pasteurization during the manufacture of anti-thrombin III. These results indicate that all the virus clearance processes commonly used have sufficient H1N1 reducing capacity to achieve a high margin of safety.

Inactivation of influenza A virus H1N1 by disinfection process.

BACKGROUND: Because any patient, health care worker, or visitor is capable of transmitting influenza to susceptible persons within hospitals, hospital-acquired influenza has been a clinical concern. Disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment, surgical instruments, and hospital environment are important measures to prevent transmission of influenza virus from hospitals to individuals. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of disinfection processes, which can be easily operated at hospitals, in inactivating influenza A virus H1N1 (H1N1). METHODS: The effects of 0.1 mol/L NaOH, 70% ethanol, 70% 1-propanol, solvent/detergent (S/D) using 0.3% tri (n-butyl)-phosphate and 1.0% Triton X-100, heat, and ethylene oxide (EO) treatments in inactivating H1N1 were determined. Inactivation of H1N1 was kinetically determined by the treatment of disinfectants to virus solution. Also, a surface test method, which involved drying an amount of virus on a surface and then applying the inactivation methods for 1 minute of contact time, was used to determine the virucidal activity. RESULTS: H1N1 was completely inactivated to undetectable levels in 1 minute of 70% ethanol, 70% 1-propanol, and solvent/detergent treatments in the surface tests as well as in the suspension tests. H1N1 was completely inactivated in 1 minute of 0.1 mol/L NaOH treatment in the suspension tests and also effectively inactivated in the surface tests with the log reduction factor of 3.7. H1N1 was inactivated to undetectable levels within 5 minutes, 2.5 minutes, and 1 minute of heat treatment at 70, 80, and 90 degrees C, respectively in the suspension tests. Also, H1N1 was completely inactivated by EO treatment in the surface tests. CONCLUSION: Common disinfectants, heat, and EO tested in this study were effective at inactivating H1N1. These results would be helpful in implementing effective disinfecting measures to prevent hospital-acquired infections.