ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Two meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones, sequence type (ST) 22 and ST239, have successfully spread globally. Across Australia, ST22 has supplanted ST239 as the main healthcare-associated MRSA. To understand the reasons underlying this shift, the epidemiology and clinical features of infections due to ST22 and ST239 MRSA isolates from a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia were compared. METHODS: Over six months, consecutive MRSA isolates with clinical data were collected from specimens referred to Alfred Health Pathology (AHP). Isolates were genotyped by a multi-locus-sequence-typing-based high-resolution melting method. FINDINGS: Three hundred and twenty-eight of 1079 (30%) S. aureus isolated by AHP were MRSA. Of these, 313 were genotyped; 78 (25%) were clonal complex (CC) 22 (representing ST22) and 142 (45%) were CC239 (representing ST239). Common clinical syndromes included skin or soft tissue, respiratory tract and osteo-articular infections. On multi-variate logistic regression, compared with CC239, CC22 was associated with older patients [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.04 for each year increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07)], and patients from subacute hospitals (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-5.8) or long-term care facilities (LTCFs; aOR 5.5, 95% CI 2.0-14.5). Median time from patient admission to MRSA isolation was nine days for CC239 and one day for CC22 (P < 0.01). MRSA strain epidemiology varied according to hospital unit. CONCLUSIONS: CC22 and CC239 MRSA have differing ecological niches. CC22 is associated with elderly patients in LTCFs, and CC239 is associated with nosocomial acquisition. Infection control strategies involving LTCFs and their residents will likely be required to achieve continued MRSA control.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Genotype , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Cross Infection/pathology , Ecosystem , Female , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Middle Aged , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Staphylococcal Infections/pathology , Staphylococcus aureus , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
A total of 421 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates were tested for ceftaroline susceptibility by Etest (bioMérieux). A multidrug resistant phenotype was found in 40.9%, and clonal complex 239 (CC239) was found in 33.5%. Ceftaroline nonsusceptibility (MIC, >1.0 µg/ml) was 16.9% overall. Nonsusceptibility was significantly higher in CC239 (41.1%, 58/141) and in isolates with a multidrug resistant phenotype (35.5%, 61/172) compared with comparators (P < 0.0001). Nonsusceptibility of common multidrug resistant MRSA clones limits the empirical use of ceftaroline for these infections.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Australia , Clone Cells , Humans , Methicillin/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phenotype , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , CeftarolineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carbapenems are traditionally reserved as the last line of defence for treatment of serious infections with multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli. Reports of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing organisms have been emerging globally, but rare in Australasia to date. We describe an outbreak of KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae at an Australian hospital. METHODS: After initial detection in October 2012, a retrospective review of patients with meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae to June 2012, and ongoing prospective surveillance, was undertaken. Included patients were admitted to the hospital after June 2012 and had meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolated from any site. Available isolates underwent detection of the KPC-2 gene by polymerase chain reaction and molecular typing was performed to determine genetic relatedness between isolates. Point-prevalence screening was performed on selected wards to detect asymptomatic carriage. Infection control procedures were implemented to contain the outbreak. RESULTS: Ten cases were identified in the initial cluster. Eight were localised to a single inpatient ward. Point-prevalence screening revealed one extra case. After temporary containment, re-emergence of KPC-producing isolates was observed post October 2013 with 18 further cases identified. Four K. pneumoniae isolates in the 2012 cluster and 16 from the 2013-2014 cluster were referred for further testing. All carried the KPC-2 beta-lactamase gene. The 2012 isolates were genetically similar to the 2014 isolates. CONCLUSION: KPC-2 mediated resistance is an emerging threat in Australia. The re-emergence of KPC despite initial containment emphasises the need for constant vigilance in the microbiology laboratory and ongoing maintenance of infection control and antimicrobial stewardship activity.
